Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Another Birth Control Pill Question


Dancypants

Recommended Posts

Dancypants Rookie

My endocrinologist is putting me on Seasonal in a couple weeks. I'm 17, weigh 85 pounds, and have never had a period...we're concerned about my bone health. She has confirmed that it is gluten-free.

My question is this...if I'm still not absorbing nutrients well right now, will I be able to absorb the hormones in the pill?

Thank you. I have learned so much from all of you!

Macy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



penguin Community Regular

That depends on how bad your malabsorption is, but I always had the pill work whenever I was on it. As in, I didn't have any babies :)

I certainly absorbed enough of it to get the side effects!

elonwy Enthusiast

Hmm. This could be an issue. Are you worried about the pill working for pregnancy purposes, or just so that you'll be getting the effects of the hormones that they are trying to give you? Not a dig, just wondering.

I never saw a change in effectiveness, but my malabsorption never got THAT bad, was relatively mild compared to many.

Is the patch an option? If she wants to make sure you're getting the hormones, that might be the way to go at first, until you start absorbing better. Personally, the sticky stuff irritated the heck out of my skin (same with bandaids) so I couldn't do the patch instead of pill, but it might be something to think about.

Have you raised the absorption question with your doctor?

Elonwy

Jestgar Rising Star

I think it partly depends on which part(s) of your intestine are damaged and where the pill is absorbed.

I'm curious about how taking the pill will make a difference for you. Is you doc trying to induce a "normal" state in your body?

Dancypants Rookie
Hmm. This could be an issue. Are you worried about the pill working for pregnancy purposes, or just so that you'll be getting the effects of the hormones that they are trying to give you? Not a dig, just wondering.

I never saw a change in effectiveness, but my malabsorption never got THAT bad, was relatively mild compared to many.

Is the patch an option? If she wants to make sure you're getting the hormones, that might be the way to go at first, until you start absorbing better. Personally, the sticky stuff irritated the heck out of my skin (same with bandaids) so I couldn't do the patch instead of pill, but it might be something to think about.

Have you raised the absorption question with your doctor?

Elonwy

Didn't even consider that a dig!

I'm not being put on it to avoid pregnancy, but rather, to restore hormone levels (to keep my bones healthy with estrogen) and so I can shed the uterine lining every 4 months. Since my osteoporosis help lead my doctor in the direction of celiac, she has since been very concerned about my bone health.

The patch wouldn't be a good option for me as I don't want to have periods every month if I don't need to. I dance ballet. Partnering and skimpy costuming make periods a worry. But if the Seasonal doesn't work, patches would be an excellent option for me.

I didn't even think of questioning my doctor about the absorption at the time...I just thought of it. I suppose I should leave a message for her tomorrow and ask this very question.

TCA Contributor

I've been married for 7 years and have been on the pill most of that time, except when pregnant or breastfeeding. For anyone worried about using it for birth control, I got pregnant 2 times while on the pill. This was all before I knew about going gluten-free and celiac. It now makes sense why it might not have been so effective for me. I'm now on the patch - just to make sure! ; )

I hope this Seasonal works for you and things are better soon!

sweetie101282 Apprentice
I've been married for 7 years and have been on the pill most of that time, except when pregnant or breastfeeding. For anyone worried about using it for birth control, I got pregnant 2 times while on the pill. This was all before I knew about going gluten-free and celiac. It now makes sense why it might not have been so effective for me. I'm now on the patch - just to make sure! ; )

I hope this Seasonal works for you and things are better soon!

Ok, I am officially freaked out... when you hear back from your doctor will you please post her response?? Thanks!

Amy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Electra Enthusiast
Ok, I am officially freaked out... when you hear back from your doctor will you please post her response?? Thanks!

Amy

Amy try not to get too nervous. My OB told me today that Celiac will not make the pill any less effective. I know some doctors have no clue, but he seemed pretty knowledgeable in both and has recently seen an increase in celiac patients so his practice has been doing a lot of research. I was on the pill for years before I found out I had Celiac and I am FERTILE MYRTLE (I got pregnant on the first try every single time I got pregnant and I've been pregnant 5 times)!! I have NEVER even had a close call with the pill and I even missed pills on occassion. I don't think you have to worry unless you've had issues with the pill not working before now. Good Luck!!

happygirl Collaborator

Macy: I had this problem this year (low weight, poor absorbtion, etc.) due to non-Celiac issues. I was worried about not absorbing and I talked to a nurse and a doctor about this. They both independently relieved my fears and said that BC was absorbed in the stomach, not the small intestine, so even if it was a Celiac problem I was having, I should be ok. I don't have any medical studies or anything to back it up, but wanted to relay what my experience was.

Best of luck.

Amy: I wouldn't worry too much, as TCA said she was NOT gluten free at the time. I see you have been gluten free since 2003, so even though according to my above post you should be ok, but even if it were an issue with the small intestines, you have been gluten free for so long that you should be healed and properly absorbing.

penguin Community Regular
Didn't even consider that a dig!

I'm not being put on it to avoid pregnancy, but rather, to restore hormone levels (to keep my bones healthy with estrogen) and so I can shed the uterine lining every 4 months. Since my osteoporosis help lead my doctor in the direction of celiac, she has since been very concerned about my bone health.

The patch wouldn't be a good option for me as I don't want to have periods every month if I don't need to. I dance ballet. Partnering and skimpy costuming make periods a worry. But if the Seasonal doesn't work, patches would be an excellent option for me.

I didn't even think of questioning my doctor about the absorption at the time...I just thought of it. I suppose I should leave a message for her tomorrow and ask this very question.

Here's a secret my ob/gyn told me: Seasonale is Mircette packaged differently.

If your doctor allows it, you can take off your patch after 3 weeks and then immediately put on another one, and repeat the process for 3 cycles. As long as you have a constant flow of hormones, you won't get your "period"

You don't get a real period on bcp's, you get withdrawl bleeding from a lack of progesterone when you're on your sugar pills. You only have a "real" period when you've ovulated and had a luteal phase in which the uterine lining builds up. Otherwise it's anovulatory bleeding or withdrawl bleeding, just FYI.

Felidae Enthusiast

I've been on the pill basically forever. I was on it for over a decade of being constantly sick and I didn't have any problems. Let me tell you it has worked like a charm. I think it is absorbed pretty quickly, but I'm just guessing.

Looking for answers Contributor

The disclaimers that come with BCP state that D can affect the effectiveness of the pill . . . but they don't say anything about absorption issues.

Sillyyakdidi Apprentice
That depends on how bad your malabsorption is, but I always had the pill work whenever I was on it. As in, I didn't have any babies :)

I certainly absorbed enough of it to get the side effects!

I'm the same as you, never had any problems. Although, I would def. say if you are still having tummy problems one way or the other, and things are coming back for a visit sooner than they should, you should look into a different form of birth control if that is what you are using it for, good luck!

Sillyyakdidi Apprentice
Hmm. This could be an issue. Are you worried about the pill working for pregnancy purposes, or just so that you'll be getting the effects of the hormones that they are trying to give you? Not a dig, just wondering.

I never saw a change in effectiveness, but my malabsorption never got THAT bad, was relatively mild compared to many.

Is the patch an option? If she wants to make sure you're getting the hormones, that might be the way to go at first, until you start absorbing better. Personally, the sticky stuff irritated the heck out of my skin (same with bandaids) so I couldn't do the patch instead of pill, but it might be something to think about.

Have you raised the absorption question with your doctor?

Elonwy

I think you should go talk to your gyno again, the patch, i think its called nuvaring is also another option, then there are the things like an IUD or other things, better safe than sorry!

Adelle Enthusiast

I was on the pill for probably 3 years (pre celiac dx) and it worked for me. Just a warning tho, DO NOT get the depo shot! I had it for a year and now that we're gonna start trying soon I decided to stop taking it. I'm on week 3 of my period!!! I know it's just my body kinda trying to put itself back. But it still sux. While on the shot I had maybe 2-3 days of super-light bleeding, which was nice. But I'm kinda making up for it now!!

Oh have u ever thought of getting like an ovulation predictor kit? So u can track urself while on the pill, cause if u ovulate obviously you aren't absorbing enuf of it. I dunno if it would work but maybe ask ur doc?

Hope u find something that works!!

hannahsue01 Enthusiast

I was on the shot for 4 years between my two kids and after a couple months never had a period untill after my 2nd daughter was born. I got pregnant about 6 months after going off the shot and never had a period. I was only on the pill for about 6 months after my last baby but never got pregnant. I went off of it as it made me sick. I am now back on the shot and continue to have no problems with it except for the fear of a needle every three months.bbI think as stated above that the idea of testing for ovulation after on the pill would be a good idea and a good indacator to whether or not you are obsorbing the pill or not. There are allot of options out there anymore that contain hormones.....I would discuss it with your doctor and see what they think.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,042
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LAJAD
    Newest Member
    LAJAD
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @KRipple! Sorry to hear of all your husband's health problems. I can only imagine how anxious this makes you as when our spouse suffers we hurt right along with them. Can you post the results from the Celiac blood testing for us to look at? We would need the names of the tests run, the numeric results and (this is important) the reference ranges for each test used to establish high/low/negative/positive. Different labs use different rating scales so this is why I ask for this. There aren't industry standards. Has your husband seen any improvement from eliminating gluten from his diet? If your husband had any positive results from his celiac blood antibody testing, this is likely what triggered the consult with a  GI doc for an endoscopy. During the endoscopy, the GI doc will likely biopsy the lining of the small bowel lining to check for the damage caused by celiac disease. This would be for confirmation of the results of the blood tests and is considered the gold standard of celiac disease diagnosis. But here is some difficult information I have for you. If your husband has been gluten free already for months leading up to the endoscopy/biopsy, it will likely invalidate the biopsy and result in a false negative. Starting the gluten free diet now will allow the lining of the small bowel to begin healing and if enough healing takes place before the biopsy happens, there will be no damage to see. How far out is the endoscopy scheduled for? There still may be time for your husband to go back on gluten, what we call a "gluten challenge" to ensure valid test results.
    • kate g
      Ive read articles that there is stage 2 research being conducted for drugs that will limit damage to celiacs through cross contamination- how close are they to this will there be enough funding to create a mainstream drug? 
    • KRipple
      Hello, My husband has had issues with really bad diarreah for over nine months now. In mid November, he went to the doctor for what they thought was a bad cold, which two weeks later was diagnosed as bronchitis. A week later, in December, I had to take him back to urgent care and from there, to the emergency room cause his vitals were too low. They said he was having an Addisionan crisis and he spent five days in the ICU. Since my husband has Autoimmune Polyendocrine Syndrome Type II (type 1 diabetes, Addison's and Hashimoto's), I fought for a blood test to determine if he had Celiacs. Given the results of the test, he was told to go to a gastro for an endoscopy. It took two months to get his first appointment with the gastro. Still waiting for the endoscopy appointment. He stopped eating gluten in the hospital and has followed a gluten-free diet since. His diarreah continues to be as bad as before he stopped eating gluten. Still has a horrible cough that makes him hack. His energy is so depleted he pretty much goes to work, comes home and goes lie in bed. He is having issues regulating body temperature. He is barely eating (he's lost 20 pounds since mid-December). Body aches. Totally run down. He has been taking more prednisone lately to try to counter the symptoms.  Today, we went to his endo to discuss these things. She said to continue taking increased amount of prednisone (even though I explained that the increased dosage is only allowing him to do the bare minimum). According to the endo, this is all related to Celiacs. I am concerned because I know that both Celiacs and Addison's can have similar symptoms, but don't know if he would still be having these many symptoms (worsening, at that) related to the Celiac's after stopping gluten two months ago. If anyone in this group has a combination of Celiacs and Addison's, could you please share your experience? I am really concerned and am feeling frustrated. His primary care provider and endocrinologist don't seem to consider this serious enough to warrant prompt attention, and we'll see about the gastro.  Thanks.
    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
×
×
  • Create New...