Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ny Times Article


DrMom

Recommended Posts

DrMom Apprentice

This is a wonderful article in the NY Times about what the food industry has done to our food. It all boils down to "If your great-great grandmother didn't serve it, you should not eat it". We have processed, and refined foods so much that many are Unrecognizeable to our digestive tract. No wonder many have Celiac Disease. Great reading, but long.

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Nancym Enthusiast

Well, I definitely agree that's the sort of thinking we should adopt toward food, but I think it doesn't go far enough. I don't really think we're well adapted to many of our neolithic foods. It takes a long, long time to adapt to new foods and I think the few thousand years we've had of eating grains isn't long enough to expect that we've adapted.

What really amazes me is that we're trying to make our pets grain eaters too. They've had even less exposure to them than we have!

Oh! Michael Pollan wrote a good book called "The Omnivore's Dilemma". I highly recommend it.

tarnalberry Community Regular

I like the historic political discussion. Gotta love how that hides behind so much in our country. Capitalism indeed...

blueeyedmanda Community Regular

Very good article, and it is true foods then are so much better than the junk that is put into them now.

Creative-Soul Newbie

Thank you for posting this article; this is along the lines of what my best friend and I have been saying for years! And most people wonder why they feel so "wonderful"... :blink:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,116
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    jpenni
    Newest Member
    jpenni
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...