Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Communion


Gwendolene

Recommended Posts

tarnalberry Community Regular
I am still trying to figure out what the meaning of 20 parts per million that the fda is saying and or studing means in real terms. I can't seem to get any answers from any one on this question :(

It's far more complicated of a problem than "you can have 20ppm of gluten".

1) The first thing to realize is that 20ppm is a density, not an amount. You could have bread that had 20ppm of gluten, and if you ate 1/4 of a one pound loaf of bread, you'd eat just over 2 miligrams of gluten. If you ate another quarter of it later that day, you'd have 5 milligrams of gluten that day.

2) They're not saying "you can have this much every day", they're saying "this is a reasonable amount for companies to reduce their gluten density to that can be tested without much risk of damage".

3) As has been pointed out, she's getting contamination in various forms unless she lives - literally - in a gluten free bubble. Purposefully eating known 'toxins' only adds to the burden of the contamination we are already exposed to, needlessly.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jayhawkmom Enthusiast

I am also Catholic, and I agree - NO amount of a normal host is safe. It's a sad and harsh reality, no doubt about that. The Benedictine Sisters have created an extremely low gluten host that is made with wheat starch, as opposed to wheat flour, and it has been approved for use in the US. They are .01% gluten - which some have determined to be a "safe" level for Celiacs. (not my personal opinion... just reiterating what their website states)

Open Original Shared Link

However, I'm not sure even that's an acceptable alternative. I would be more comfortable being one of the first to receive from an uncontaminated chalice. (Obviously, NOT the presider chalice!) I am still trying to figure this one out for myself. My son, who was just dx - will no longer receive the host. It is his choice to simply receive a blessing. I do not feel that *any* amount of gluten is acceptable for him.

My daughter not only has Celiac... but she's also allergic to wheat. So, when she is of the age of reason where she is able to make her first communion, I honestly have no idea what we'll do.

And, it poses an extra special little issue for me... since I'm the Sacramental Prep teacher at our church. I'm taking my 2nd grade class to Mass next week... and I have to figure out how to approach the topic of how important the Eucharist is... yet, let them know that I can't receive it because it'll make me sick. This is going to be interesting. =(

Sillyyakdidi Apprentice
I know it's tough to read all this - especially after going through all the tough work to figure out what to do in the situation. But the studies on gluten exposure have shown that gluten exposure even once a month negates the majority of long-term benefit of the diet, and raises the risk of intestinal cancers, lymphoma, and a shortened life span to nearly the rates of untreated celiac.

I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I really hope that you and your daughter and your priest will revisit the issue. Perhaps, with her in the congregation, "not always having the wine around" isn't an option any longer.

thanks for backing me up on this one, i think the point may be taken now that others have also explained, i think that a priest may know many things, but probably doesn't know about celiac disease and what may or may not hurt a celiac

debmidge Rising Star

The "parts per million" is a guideline for manufacturers. It's not a suggestion for celiacs to adhere to.

For example, Benefiber now has added "wheat" to their fiber product and this is unacceptable to us even though they claims to have so many small parts per million in their processing. In the first place, there was no reason to change the formula and secondarily since the "parts per million" follows guidelines (made by those who don't have celiac I suppose) Benefiber CAN put label on product stating it's GLUTEN FREE.

The regular Roman Catholic hosts have the full luten and the low gluten hosts have same issue as the Benefiber product.

Canadian Karen Community Regular
I beleive it was our priest who thought it would be ok, so we will have to explain it some more to him.

First off, I would like to commend you and your daughter for having such devotion. Sometimes, we put so much faith in our priest that we forget that they too are human. Priests may very well know every inch of the bible and the history of religion, but when it comes to celiac, it's hard for them to understand the seriousness of the situation. After all, half the doctors are up to speed on celiac disease either!

Your priest seems to believe that a crumb is harmless. I wonder would he think the same thing if your daughter had a peanut allergy and the host contained peanuts?

We have to get the mindset of society to change: To a celiac, gluten is poison. Ask your priest if he still wishes to continue to poison your daughter......

Hugs.

Karen

SpikeMoore Apprentice

Hi There

For me this whole discussing is quite ironic...here's why...was/am Catholic but cannot take communion because I divorced my first spouse for reasons of his infidelity. I remarried without an annulment. Life has never been happier. Since I have applied for one and since I have gone gluten free...hmm...

debmidge Rising Star

bpritt: What does "DVT" in your signature mean?

D.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



bpritt Newbie
bpritt: What does "DVT" in your signature mean?

D.

DVT is short for deep vein thrombosis, i.e., a blood clot obstructing a vein.

bbuster Explorer
Our priests really gives her a small tiny piece just where she can receive the body of crist. At some of our masses we do not have wine so she is stuck. She also goes to Catholic school and they have mass weekly. She refuses the host 3 times a month there and just does it once a month in a very tiny peice. I know she should not take any but she is 10 years old and has her mind made up. She never asks to cheat or does and she is very relgious. She is not super sensitive and has no problems that we know of. I keep telling her that she does not need to take any but since she is new to this whole diet thing she feels very uncomfortable giving up on her relgious practices but I am working on it.

Thanks for your concern

Here's an option you might consider:

go to website www.benedictinesisters.org and look under "altar breads" and low gluten. They make a low gluten host which is less than .01% gluten, and considering what it weighs, the most it would contain is 37 MICROgrams of gluten - .00037 grams. To put this in perspective, a small breadcrumb has something on the order of .10 grams (10,000 micrograms) of gluten. Use of this host is sanctioned by the Catholic church.

My son goes to a Catholic school and this is what he receives. I order and provide it to the parish office. We belong to a parish that has no school, but my son and a few adults receive this host at Sunday mass - in this case our parish provides the hosts.

DownWithGluten Explorer
We're Catholic and the priest has a separate chalice for wine - in the Catholic Communion rite, they break a piece of the large host into the wine. That bit of wafer was enough to give our daughter symptoms.

Oh, dang, didn't even think of that! My mom researched and found that wine was good enough to take (w/o the host)...but I didn't even think of that part, when he breaks the piece into the wine.

And jayhawkmom (I think I got the SN right)...good luck in CCD teaching the kids about communion even though you can't take it. That will be awkward. :unsure: I know when I first heard I couldn't take it (...if I really do have gluten-intolerance, lol)...I almost felt like a vampire or something. You know, the host making me all sick. Not really funny but...ya gotta have a sense of humor... at least there are alternatives, like being blessed and having wine seperated and whatnot.

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
And jayhawkmom (I think I got the SN right)...good luck in CCD teaching the kids about communion even though you can't take it. That will be awkward.

Yep, it is a little awkward. In fact, I'm taking my class to mass on Sunday - and I've had to ask my DRE how to handle the issue. We have it all figured out... we think. =)

Thanks for the well wishes. It's an odd situation, but I'm doing my best to make the best of it! =)

jerseyangel Proficient
Hi

I am wondering what you do for protestant communion (I would still like to partake). I am also allergic to eggs, dairy products and sugar.

Are some denominations more understanding than others? I come from a Lutheran background, but am unsure how to handle this...

This was the original post on this thread. Please keep this in mind when answering, and lets stay on topic.

Scott has repeatedly stated that this is not the fourm to discuss religion in depth. Gentlemen, if you want to continue your discussion, it would be best to do it via PM.

Thanks.

AllysonBrightMeyer Rookie

Hi-

In regards to the original post. I am also Lutheran (ELCA) and my church has wheat-free (they are also corn-free & dairy-free) wafers available at each service.

I was really stressed regarding what to do about this, also, and even avoided going to church a bit. Then I finally decided to go again, and I was just planning to skip communion. Low & behold, the bulletin announced they were now offering wheat-free wafers. I was so touched by that.

I am sure your pastor will be willing to help make arrangements for you. My mother has a friend at her church (Presbyterian) and she brings her own bread each week. I would sit down with your pastor & discuss your issue, and see what he/she thinks the best course of action would be.

  • 1 month later...
Gwendolene Rookie
Hi-

In regards to the original post. I am also Lutheran (ELCA) and my church has wheat-free (they are also corn-free & dairy-free) wafers available at each service.

I was really stressed regarding what to do about this, also, and even avoided going to church a bit. Then I finally decided to go again, and I was just planning to skip communion. Low & behold, the bulletin announced they were now offering wheat-free wafers. I was so touched by that.

Sorry it took me so long to reply back, I've been having technical difficulties. Thanks for all your support! Actually, I was playing phone tag with my pastor for a few weeks, but never actually said anything about gluten yet. Then I came to church and he announced they had gluten-free wafers now. I cried. It was like a mini-miracle. God knew exactly what I needed :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...