Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Another Idiot Doctor


GlutenWrangler

Recommended Posts

GlutenWrangler Contributor

First of all, whether or not I decide to do the test, nobody is going to die because my insurance company needs to make up the cost. That's an absolutely ridiculous thing to say.

Second, I'm not angry about his differing opinion. I'm angry about the way he handled the situation. It was incredibly unprofessional and a giant waste of time for me.

Third, I'm aware that the elimination diet works. I realize that it may be the best method for detecting food sensitivities. But maybe I would like to have the test done, and try the elimination diet. Just to see what correlates. There should be no reason why I can't do that and not catch hell for it.

-Brian


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jlinc Rookie

Hi,

I think there have been some very negative things said about doctors, and I can't agree with painting them all with the same brush.

Brian, your doctor seems to have some personal frustrations that are emerging in his practice, and they may be getting in the way of doing good medicine.

My GP is kind of clueless about celiac, but he listens and he tries. My sig relates my experience with him when he diagnosed me. But I've just had to reassess my expecations of him. I go to a naturopath who knows exactly what she's talking about.

Of course, I'm lucky that I've got pretty flexible health care. I really feel for people who have to go to dr's like your allergist.

J.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,812
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    hmkr
    Newest Member
    hmkr
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Yeah, you may not have been consuming enough gluten to result in valid testing.
    • Kiwifruit
      Thank you for your reply. I was having about 2 slices of bread a day and other incidental gluten (occasional crackers and baked goods) so not reduced from my normal but not the 6 slices of bread like I’ve now seen suggested somewhere.
    • Sking
      I just received my lab results from the endoscopy/biopsies to see if I have Celiac. My doctor's office said it could take up to two weeks for the doctor to read the results and contact me to interpret them. I am wondering if anyone can help me to understand my results? On one hand, it seems like maybe I don't have it, but have something called Brunner Glands Hyperplasia, on the other hand it says I have increased lymphocytes and villous distortion. I am very confused. How will the doctor decide if I do or don't have it? I am so confused about all of this from the start of the journey a year ago, I really appreciate people's time on here reading this and helping me understand. Thank you.   Anatomic Pathology Report Test Current Result and Flag Previous Result and Date Units Reference Interval Diagnosis synopsis: 01 Part 1-Gastric ,Upper GI Polyp(s), Excision, Stomach: PARIETAL CELL HYPERPLASIA IDENTIFIED. NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA. Part 2-Duodenum ,Duodenum Biopsy: DUODENAL MUCOSA WITH NO DIAGNOSTIC ABNORMALITIES. NO EVIDENCE OF CELIAC DISEASE. NEGATIVE FOR GIARDIA, OTHER PARASITES OR OTHER PATHOGENIC ORGANISMS. NEGATIVE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI. NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA OR MALIGNANCY. Part 3-Bulb,Duodenum Biopsy: DUODENAL MUCOSA WITH INCREASED INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES AND VILLOUS DISTORTION. SEE COMMENT. Specimen: 01 Part 1-Gastric ,Upper GI Polyp(s), Excision, Stomach Part 2-Duodenum ,Duodenum Biopsy Part 3-Bulb,Duodenum Biopsy Endoscopic findings: 01 Part 1-Polyp Part 2- Part 3- Clinical diagnosis: 01 Part 1- Part 2-R/O Celiac Sprue Part 3-R/O Celiac Sprue Diagnosis: 01 Part 1-PARIETAL CELL HYPERPLASIA IDENTIFIED. NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA. Part 2-DUODENAL MUCOSA WITH NO DIAGNOSTIC ABNORMALITIES. NO EVIDENCE OF CELIAC DISEASE. NEGATIVE FOR GIARDIA, OTHER PARASITES OR OTHER PATHOGENIC ORGANISMS. NEGATIVE FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI. NEGATIVE FOR DYSPLASIA OR MALIGNANCY. Part 3-DUODENAL MUCOSA WITH INCREASED INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES AND VILLOUS DISTORTION. SEE COMMENT. Comment: 01 Part 1- Part 2- Part 3- Villous distortion could be due to Brunner glands hyperplasia and not truly associated with celiac disease. Please see the diagnosis of Jar 2. Recommend clinical correlation. Anatomic Pathology Report (Cont.) Part 1-There is parietal cell hyperplasia with enlargement and dilatation of the lumens of some oxyntic glands. No dysplasia is seen. Part 2-Duodenal mucosa shows preserved villous architecture and normal cellularity of the lamina propria. Brunner glands are identified. No gastric metaplasia is seen. No dysplasia or malignancy is identified. There are no viral inclusions. No Giardia, other parasites or other pathogenic organisms are seen. No Helicobacter pylori organisms are identified. Part 3-Increased numbers of intraepithelial lymphocytes are noted (>6 lymphocytes/20 enterocytes at villous tips). Duodenal mucosa also shows villous distortion and slightly increased cellularity of the lamina propria. Brunner glands are hyperplastic. Gross description: 01 Part 1-The specimen is received in formalin labeled "KING, SHOSHANNA, Gastric Polyp ". Received are 2 fragments of tan, soft, tissue measuring 0.4 x 0.3 x 0.1 cm to 0.3 x 0.2 x 0.1 cm. The specimen is submitted entirely in cassette 1. Part 2-The specimen is received in formalin labeled "KING, SHOSHANNA, Duodenum Bx ". Received are multiple fragments of tan, soft, tissue measuring 0.5 x 0.2 x 0.2 cm to 0.1 x 0.1 x 0.1 cm. The specimen is submitted entirely in cassettes 1-2. Minute fragment(s) may not survive processing.  
    • susan connolly
      Thank you !  what would I do without this forum !  And all the gluten-free help  I  made this myself and was soooo careful.  But you r probably right.   ty for taking the time to post  😇💐 susan 
    • Scott Adams
      This is another study that dispels the myth that glyphosate is safe: "Pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An environment-wide association study": https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35572 
×
×
  • Create New...