Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help The Us Govt Define "gluten Free"


VegasCeliacBuckeye

Recommended Posts

VegasCeliacBuckeye Collaborator

ACDA Launches Survey to Assist FDA on Gluten-Free Labeling

The FDA's proposal for labeling products 'gluten-free' was published on January 23, 2007. The FDA has requested feedback from consumers on several issues relating to the gluten-free diet, and how individuals make choices about gluten-free products.

Today, the American Celiac Disease Alliance (ACDA) is launching a survey focused on several questions posed by the FDA. The survey was developed by dietitians with expertise in the gluten-free diet and who are associated with the Dietitians in Gluten Intolerance Diseases (DIGID), a specialty subunit of the American Dietetic Association.

Please take a few moments to complete this very important survey. The results will be compiled and presented to the FDA by the ACDA.

To access the survey go to the ACDA website

www.americanceliac.org/news.htm

Your comments will help the FDA decide what type of gluten-free labeling will be allowed in the United States. The survey closes on March 15, 2007.

Thank you for being an advocate for celiacs.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Looking for answers Contributor

Thanks for the post . . . I just completed the survey and it took only five minutes!

jerseyangel Proficient

I did the survey, too :)

Nantzie Collaborator

Me too!

Ursa Major Collaborator

Me four.................ah, I mean, too. :P

mouse Enthusiast

Just did mine.

darlindeb25 Collaborator

Survey for Celiac Alliance

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't believe it. There is a survey about gluten-free labeling and even the people who do not have the gold standard diagnosis can participate. OK, gang, make our voice heard and fill out the survey. Open Original Shared Link

If you scroll down a bit, there is a link to sending comments directly to the FDA.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Thanks you both for that information. I just did mine. But, it does make you think a little.

I guess your answers can reflect in your experience/time into the diet and your trust of manufactures to list correctly.

I have to admit that when I was dx'd, I bought alot of gluten free foods. I also have to admit, that they are still here and I don't want to eat/fix/bake them. I have learned to deal without and eat well.

When fresh green beans get labled gluten free, now that's over the top. :(

Mtndog Collaborator

Thanks for posting this!

Guest cassidy

Thanks for posting this. I forwarded the link to my local celiac group so that they can get the word out.

I just wonder how many people react at a level of 20ppm. I know I'm very sensitive and every time I have gotten sick it has been from some tiny crumb because I'm very careful, but I don't know how much does make me sick. I would hate for them to say 20ppm is ok and that still be an amount that gets the very sensitive people sick - that would be worse than no labeling at all.

gfp Enthusiast
Thanks for posting this. I forwarded the link to my local celiac group so that they can get the word out.

I just wonder how many people react at a level of 20ppm. I know I'm very sensitive and every time I have gotten sick it has been from some tiny crumb because I'm very careful, but I don't know how much does make me sick. I would hate for them to say 20ppm is ok and that still be an amount that gets the very sensitive people sick - that would be worse than no labeling at all.

I agree and though this doesn't directly affect me like you guys I'd say the easiest way is pretty obvious....

Gluten Free should always mean gluten-free.... pure and simple and the limit should be if it can be detected by any method then its not gluten-free.

This gives them something to aim for....

Because of CC and mixed product lines and just plain accidents you can just have a catergory for "very low gluten". Because of the way different levels are tested and relative costs in testing then 20ppm is a sensible cut off.

I can warn about what happened in Europe using the 200ppm and perhaps this is useful but basically companies figured they had some "slack" to play with. Many of the gluten-free breads used wheat products (deglutified) etc. and the 200ppm which was sorta designed as a limit the companies could go up to ended up being a limit they aimed for because there was no certification they could aim for that meant 100%....

I know myself I can eat certain gluten-free breads with wheat starch at <20ppm but I can't eat a lot of it... or regularly. The problem seems to be that the effects of even tiny amounts of gluten are cumulative...

Its totally possible to make 100% gluten-free if you have an audit trail on the supplies and don't use additives. but unless the manufacturers are given something to aim for why would they bother??

VegasCeliacBuckeye Collaborator

Bump

Please take the time to do this survey! It affects us all (well, at least the US folks - but we could use the help from around the world!)

BB

Creative-Soul Newbie

Thanks for posting this! I just did mine...interesting questions...

I hope many, many people take the time to do this; it only takes a few minutes!

Guhlia Rising Star

I did it too. I agree with gfp... Gluten free should mean gluten free. I will likely not trust labels anymore if they keep in at the 20ppm level. That would be a real shame. I'll have to go back to eating only meats, fruits, and vegetables. Ugh...

kbtoyssni Contributor

The questions about oats have me freaked out. I would be really upset if they label oat-containing foods gluten-free.

Mtndog Collaborator
The questions about oats have me freaked out. I would be really upset if they label oat-containing foods gluten-free.

I know- me too! I know the protein is different but I don't think it's been definitively proven that oats DON'T do damage. Does anyone know otherwise? If oats were not cross-contaminated would they be safe? I woouldn't eat them, but I'm curious.

gfp Enthusiast
I know- me too! I know the protein is different but I don't think it's been definitively proven that oats DON'T do damage. Does anyone know otherwise? If oats were not cross-contaminated would they be safe? I woouldn't eat them, but I'm curious.

I'm pretty certain there is as much evidence in both directions....

Since this is a health issue then IMHO they should be labelled....

However I don't think they should be labelled "gluten" since this is technically incorrect and once you actually take a step away from "gluten free" meaning exactly that you are inviting all sorts of exceptions.

When you look at the whole way its been done in Europe the justification is that we are too stupid to understand .. its the same with additives and "E" numbers. I find that very concept disturbing. If it disturbs someone to have a list of additives making up 90% of the label then perhaps they should think of reducing the additives, not the numer of numbers/letters it takes up on the jar.

If you ever read shampoo etc. its entirely the opposite... instead of writing water they write "aqua" and then a whole load of invented words like "enriched with <insert catchy phrase here>" ...

kbtoyssni Contributor
I know- me too! I know the protein is different but I don't think it's been definitively proven that oats DON'T do damage. Does anyone know otherwise? If oats were not cross-contaminated would they be safe? I woouldn't eat them, but I'm curious.

From what I've read the protien in oats is starting to be different enough from the wheat gluten protien that some celiacs react and some don't (and I mean an actual autoimmune reaction, not just symptoms of glutening because some celiacs are asymptomatic even when damage is being done). I have no idea if I react, but I choose not to eat oats. Not worth it. And I didn't like oatmeal much anyhow so no biggie.

This reminds me of England. Some things are labeled gluten-free but contain wheat starch. I know in those cases wheat starch is tested to be below a certain number of ppm, but if it's got a few ppm and I eat several, that's might put me over the limit. Again, not worth it.

kbtoyssni Contributor

Oh, and I answered the "if we determine oats are gluten-free how do you want them labeled?" with OTHER: "I will not eat oats even if you do think they're gluten-free."

gfp Enthusiast
From what I've read the protien in oats is starting to be different enough from the wheat gluten protien that some celiacs react and some don't (and I mean an actual autoimmune reaction, not just symptoms of glutening because some celiacs are asymptomatic even when damage is being done). I have no idea if I react, but I choose not to eat oats. Not worth it. And I didn't like oatmeal much anyhow so no biggie.

This reminds me of England. Some things are labeled gluten-free but contain wheat starch. I know in those cases wheat starch is tested to be below a certain number of ppm, but if it's got a few ppm and I eat several, that's might put me over the limit. Again, not worth it.

Exactly my experience. If I have the under 20ppm bread I can perhaps get away with a couple of slices ..at least as far as GI

symptoms but who can say what damage its causing. but I know from experience if I eat it all then I'll be ill.

I have no idea if I react, but I choose not to eat oats. Not worth it. And I didn't like oatmeal much anyhow so no biggie.

Well, I have to say, I'd quiite like some oat flapjacks and real oatcakes ... BUT even so I still agree, its just not worth it.

I think the only test I would be happy with would be screening me direct for antibodies.... and quite simply if they elevated at all then NO.

sunshinen Apprentice

I doubt anyone will ever start labeling fresh produce or eggs (in their shells) as gluten-free, but the other month, I realized some frozen veggies I bought had wheat in them. WHY???? :huh: There was nothing on the front to tell me to expect anything other than fresh, frozen veggies. It was not until I saw that they were not on the "gluten-free" list that I even thought to make sure if they were okay. So I'm all for a gluten-free label being allowed on anything that is actually gluten-free. Even "pure" rice flour. That way I know it hasn't been processed on a line that processes wheat flour.

I think the statement "all rice flour is gluten free" is a terrible idea to put into people's heads--especially newbies. There is just too much room for the introduction of gluten into things that many people would expect to be gluten-free (whether by contamination or "hidden gluten" ingredients). So I say allow companies to label away! (as long as that label actually means something.) :D

Mango04 Enthusiast
I doubt anyone will ever start labeling fresh produce or eggs (in their shells) as gluten-free,

I've actually seen that label on eggs in other countries. :lol: It's pretty funny.

Keenwa Newbie

I read something today that said that 0-2ppm is not even testable - That the lowest amount that's testable is 3ppm. So I suggested that 3ppm be the allowable limit. I'm not concerned about eating one thing that is 20ppm - I'm concerned about the cumulative effects of eating SEVERAL things each day that might have 20ppm.

zansu Rookie

yeah, like that "how much do you think 20ppm is: 1 TSpn, etc" I said other: "depends on the serving size!" 20ppm in a vitamin is a different animal than 20ppm in an entree....

but I'm with y'all: if I eat 3 or 4 things that are low gluten, how sick am I going to get? I learned about cumulative glutening with a medicine. Took me 2 weeks to start having symptoms.

gfp Enthusiast
I read something today that said that 0-2ppm is not even testable - That the lowest amount that's testable is 3ppm. So I suggested that 3ppm be the allowable limit. I'm not concerned about eating one thing that is 20ppm - I'm concerned about the cumulative effects of eating SEVERAL things each day that might have 20ppm.

Its completely testable, it just costs more....

Indeed its possible to test down to 1 millionth part of this in ppb, the testing is just way more expensive and takes much longer.

When people quote lower testing limits they are regarding a specific test... commonly for gluten these are ELISA tests which have then benefit of being cheap and quick but the disadvantage of not providing quantitive analysis at low concentrations...

Secondly all testing has two method based limits (method being the term used for the recipe followed in testing) the first is the MDL or minimum detecting level and the second being MRL or minimum reporting limit.

MDL means a substance was detected but the test was not able to give an accurate quantitive test within those limits...

MRL is a legal definition, it is defined by legislation according to what is being tested for...

It is possible to test for gluten or its consituents in parts per billion, but to accurately determine 100ppb from 200ppb is much harder/more expensive.

The major reason tests are expensive however is how popular a test is.... for instrumentation based analysis like GC-MS you also have expense in sample prep and consumables, to analyse for different substances quantitively means changing the column to one which is specific to that class of compounds... thus $500 minimum for a single sample ... just for the column but then the machine needs to be completely recalibrated which means standards, sample prep and machine time... hence switching to quantitive gluten as a one off is going to cost in the thousands .... BUT if the machine is already set-up and calibrated for gluten it costs machine time, tech time and sample prep time... as part of an ongoing analysis your talking change from $20.... vs $2-3 for ELISA tests.

What I m saying is the regulations to a large extend determine the cost of the tests. No food company is forced to test to ppb so the tests are not set-up and waiting... thus if a speciality gluten-free company wants to test its prohibitively expensive. Meanwhile for the big food companies like the Phillip Morris group, Danone and Nestle it is far from being in their interests to have these tests...

If the tests were available and cheap then legislation might make them use them! If they did that then they would have to start putting trace of gluten on a lof of stuff they get away with right now.

Kraft make a bid deal about "never intentionally hiding gluten", but they then go to great lengths NOT to find out... some how I don't think they care if it has gluten in it or not, merely that they have to label it as such. Remember this is the same company funded research to cast doubt on cigaretes causing cancer for 50 years....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Karen Chakerian's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Getting rid of the belly bloat

    2. - knitty kitty replied to SaiP's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      18

      Dangerously underweight, Perfect gluten free and insomnia

    3. - trents replied to SaiP's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      18

      Dangerously underweight, Perfect gluten free and insomnia

    4. - trents replied to Karen Chakerian's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Getting rid of the belly bloat

    5. - Karen Chakerian posted a topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Getting rid of the belly bloat


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Piichii83
    Newest Member
    Piichii83
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @Karen Chakerian, We need more information, please.   What homeopathic remedies or medications are you taking now?  Do you still have the blood pressure and other symptoms?  What is included in your diet currently?  Dairy? Oats?  Processed gluten free foods?  Vegetarian?  Other food allergies?  Do you take vitamins?  When gluten is removed from the diet, the body stops making the anti-gluten antibodies that are usually measured in blood tests used to diagnose Celiac disease.  To measure the anti-gluten antibodies, you would have to consume 10 grams of gluten (4-6 slices of bread or equivalent) per day for a minimum of 2 weeks or longer.   A DNA test which looks for the most common genes for Celiac Disease may be a less invasive avenue to pursue.  Has your doctor checked you for nutritional deficiencies? Glad you're here!
    • knitty kitty
      @SaiP, Insomnia is listed as one of the side effects of Loratadine.   Niacin B3 in the form Tryptophan, Pyridoxine B 6, Folate B 9, Cobalamine B12, Magnesium, and Thiamine B 1 are needed to produce the sleep hormone melatonin.  Insomnia can also be caused by low Vitamin D and low Vitamin A.   A strict gluten free diet can be low in essential  vitamins.   Gluten containing products are required to replace vitamins lost in processing and milling.  Gluten free processed foods are not required to have vitamins added.  White rice is not a good source of B vitamins.  Brown rice is little better.  Exposure to light (even grocery store lights) and heat (during transportation) can destroy B vitamins.   B vitamins are easily lost in urine and diarrhea because they are water soluble.  If you have had diarrhea longer than two weeks, you are probably low in B vitamins.  Fat based vitamins, like Vitamins D and A, can be low due to fat malabsorption in Celiac disease, too.   Damaged villa in Celiac Disease do not absorb B vitamins and fat based vitamins and minerals well.  Supplementing with essential nutrients while villi heal boosts the ability to absorb essential vitamins and minerals.  Vitamins are stored and utilized inside cells.  Blood levels are not accurate measurements of vitamin deficiencies.  You can have normal blood levels while having deficiencies inside cells.  The brain orders cells to release their stores so the brain and heart can keep functioning.  This results in normal blood levels, but vitamin deficits inside cells.   Your indulgence in a little bit of bread is providing some, but insufficient amounts, of vitamins needed to make sleep hormone melatonin while keeping your inflammation and histamine production high.   In addition to a B Complex, I took 1000 mg of tryptophan before bed to correct my insomnia caused by high histamine levels.  Correcting my Vitamin D level to between 75-100 nmol/ml helped as well.  Also Passion flower extract is helpful in falling asleep quickly.   Please stop eating gluten bread as this will keep your autoimmune response triggering and your antibody levels won't go down and your histamine levels will stay up as well.   Celiac is a marathon, not a sprint.  P.S. I wanted to reiterate that insomnia and weight loss are symptoms of Thiamine deficiency.  Benfotiamine is a form of thiamine that promotes intestinal healing.  Thiamine is water soluble and nontoxic even in high doses.  High doses are needed to correct thiamine deficiency. All mitochondria in cells utilize thiamine.  The World Health Organization says to take 500 - 1000 mg per day of thiamine and look for health improvement.  Diets that are high in carbohydrates like rice and gluten require more thiamine.  For every 1000 calories from carbohydrates, we need 500 mg more thiamine.  Thiamine is found in meat.  Few veggies contain thiamine. Can you rise from a squat without assistance?  This is the field test for thiamine deficiency used by WHO.  If you cannot rise easily from a squat you may be thiamine deficient.
    • trents
      Earlier, you mentioned the possibility of adding in sweet potatoes. Have you tried that? Have you tried sourdough bread? Some people with celiac disease claim they can eat sourdough without a gluten reaction. The fermentation process alters the protein somewhat.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Karen Chakerian! So, for the sake of clarity, you have self-diagnosed yourself as having celiac disease but are not officially diagnosed by medical testing. Is this correct?
    • Karen Chakerian
      I’m 70 years old and have RA for 25 years. I’d never had digestive issues or even heard of celiac until 2 months ago.  6 years ago I started having serious diarrhea, dropped what little weight I had,  became very exhausted, developed rapid onset blood pressure and other symptoms. I went to the doctor for an unrelated matter and even with my records he told me they have ‘pills’ for all those things; which I turned down and sought to deal with this with homeopathic remedies.  Mid October 2024 my guts hurt terribly and started to swell. My massage therapist asked about celiac and I started to do research on it. It absolutely fits all the symptoms so I’ve been gluten free since 2 days before Thanksgiving but the huge gut persists. Thankfully the pain and cramps are gone. I look like a 90# pregnant skeleton.  I’m exhausted and looking for some encouragement from the tribe. I have good days and bad. I know living with an autoimmune disease sucks but this is even worse than the RA. 
×
×
  • Create New...