Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Wheat Gluten Killing Pets?


CMCM

Recommended Posts

CMCM Rising Star

I just heard on the radio that with reference to those recent tainted pet food deaths of a number of dogs and cats, they are now focusing on WHEAT GLUTEN as the culprit!!!! Here's the link:

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Viola 1 Rookie
I just heard on the radio that with reference to those recent tainted pet food deaths of a number of dogs and cats, they are now focusing on WHEAT GLUTEN as the culprit!!!! Here's the link:

Open Original Shared Link

It's the "contamination" of wheat gluten that's causing the problem ... not the wheat gluten itself.

larry mac Enthusiast
I just heard on the radio that with reference to those recent tainted pet food deaths of a number of dogs and cats, they are now focusing on WHEAT GLUTEN as the culprit!!!! Here's the link:

Open Original Shared Link

OMG, that is breaking news!!!! Now they're focusing on WHEAT GLUTEN??? What took them so long? Hope it doesn't take another six days to find out for sure what it is.

best regards, lm

UR Groovy Explorer

In the article you've sited: Open Original Shared Link

it states:

"Because wheat gluten itself wouldn't cause kidney failure, FDA investigators are examining other ingredients as possible sources of contamination. Those include heavy metals like cadmium and lead or fungal toxins. Aflatoxin, a corn fungus, sparked a 2005 dog food recall. "

2 things to say here.

The main thing that's bothering me is this:

Why can't there just be an analysis to see what the contaminant is? Don't we have sophisticated technology to determine such things? And, if so, why doesn't some independent laboratory come in and do testing? Must we constantly rely on the FDA for information? I, for one, have grown a little weary of that particular perspective. Maybe I'm wrong about this, but it seems that some simple tests would be able to show what's going on.

Also, again, it doesn't appear to be the gluten itself. They've been pretty much saying this since the story broke. Don't get me wrong, I think gluten is evil (at least, it's evil in my world), but it appears that it's more than the gluten itself. I hate to beat a dead horse, but I had to mention it again.

psawyer Proficient

The suspected cause, as mentioned, is contamination in the wheat gluten ingredient. The investigation is ongoing. As I understand it, Menu Foods used an alternate supplier for this ingredient for a period from December to early March at two US plants. They have since discontinued using that supplier. All of the product from that source has been used up in the manufacturing process, so it cannot be directly tested. Food manufactured using that ingredient can be tested, but it is one thing to identify the poison and quite another thing to prove where it came from.

I own a store that sells pet food and supplies, so I have been on top of this issue since it broke last Friday afternoon. The media have given it a lot of play. Here are a few facts:

1. The issue applies only to wet food, that is cans and foil pouches;

2. The issue applies only to foods which are "cuts in gravy" or similarly name styles.

3. The issue concerns products made in only two of Menu's four plants, and primarily to the one in Emporia, KS.

4. No dry food, or biscuits, or treats, of ANY BRAND are involved in the recall.

Wheat gluten is a normal ingredient in the gravy in these products, and is not itself the issue. The problem is believed to arise from heavy metal contamination in the wheat gluten, although there are some organic toxins that have yet to be ruled out.

For more recall information, Open Original Shared Link

jerseyangel Proficient

Thank you Peter--

I've been looking to you for my information about this. I know if anyone knows the facts here, it's you. :D I appreciate you keeping us posted.

gfp Enthusiast

OK, sometimes sarcasm excplains stuff best for me.... its nothing personal... and the poster could be anyone so don't be offended..Im trying to write this like a FDA official saying why :D

:ph34r:

In the article you've sited: Open Original Shared Link

it states:

"Because wheat gluten itself wouldn't cause kidney failure, FDA investigators are examining other ingredients as possible sources of contamination. Those include heavy metals like cadmium and lead or fungal toxins. Aflatoxin, a corn fungus, sparked a 2005 dog food recall. "

2 things to say here.

The main thing that's bothering me is this:

Why can't there just be an analysis to see what the contaminant is? Don't we have sophisticated technology to determine such things?

Erm, what exactly do you want to analyse for? If you pay we'll find someone to analyse.

And, if so, why doesn't some independent laboratory come in and do testing?

Sure if you wanna pay.... however at the moment what exactly are you going to pay to test for? Heavy metals, fungus or mould?

bacteria? Also is it all contaminated or just some... is it contaminated at source (the supplier) or in production?

Go ahead ... take a cool million and you can screen for everything then when they work out what is is you can pay again to have it quantitively analysed????

Must we constantly rely on the FDA for information? I, for one, have grown a little weary of that particular perspective. Maybe I'm wrong about this, but it seems that some simple tests would be able to show what's going on.

Lots, once again if you are going to pay them .... indeed if you have a million spare the testing lab can easily come up with enough tests to probably find what it is.... presuming its present in the samples we get?

Then again we might waste the million... and find nothing in the samples we have but its your money....

/sarcasm off

In other words the FDA money is your money, its from taxpayers...

Like it or not a lot of tax payers would be pissed if they so the FDA spend a million testing pet food and the results are inconclusive... in perspective its not a lot per person or even per pet owner... but people get awfully upset over where tax $ go....

What is likely to happen is autopsy of the pets ... then try and pin point... is it chemical, biological or what...??

If its bacteria ... cultures take time to grow....

Another thing is what else were the pets eating.... just as an aside... millions of dog owners poision their dogs daily giving them chocolate.. this causes kidney failure... what if the gluten contamination alone isn't responsible and thee dogs had compromised kidney function because their owners were feeding them something like chocolate?

Sorry if you take offense, non is meant... I just think a snotty type FDA cover their ass answer illustrates the problem better than 20 pages of possible links and stuff????

edits:

Just saw Peter's reply. and he's obviously on top of it....

The heavy metal contamination could be one thing... but like he says

though there are some organic toxins that have yet to be ruled out.

and like I say it could be a combination of both....

I wonder what ergot does to dogs?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



UR Groovy Explorer
Sorry if you take offense, non is meant...

Okay, Wait

Lisa Mentor

CNN...

Rat Poison is the source for the contaminated pet food.

gfp Enthusiast
Okay, Wait
Michi8 Contributor
CNN...

Rat Poison is the source for the contaminated pet food.

That's sick. Pet food couldn't accidentally be contaminated with rat poison...I hope they find out who is responsible for this!

Michelle

jerseyangel Proficient

It's horrible...

Here's the link to the CNN report--

Open Original Shared Link

UR Groovy Explorer
CNN...

Rat Poison is the source for the contaminated pet food.

Thanks, Momma Goose for the info. That is just terrible.

Makes me want to turn my back yard into an organic farm & go fishing.

blueeyedmanda Community Regular

This is horrible, if it happened to animal food...who is to say it couldn't happen to our food as well, that is scary!

I feel horrible for all those pet owners who have lost their pets or have very ill pets due to this.

Michi8 Contributor

More info from ABC News:

Open Original Shared Link

Apparently the poison was on wheat imported from China. Pretty darned scary! What are the chances that this wheat has been used in products for human consumption as well?

Michelle

psawyer Proficient

I've been away for about 24 hours due to a combination of ISP technical problems with my connection, and being in the store instead of here at home.

A specific toxin, Open Original Shared Link, has been identified in samples of the affected food by an independant laboratory. This is a chemical used in some places as a rodent poison, but it is not permitted for that purpose in either Canada or the US. It is used in treatment of some cancers on a limited basis.

The source is still suspected to be the wheat gluten used in the gravy. There is an unconfirmed report on Open Original Shared Link that Menu is now recalling all products in the list regardless of production date. I have not been able to confirm this with Menu. I do know that I have been asked by Nutro to remove all affected products from sale in my store, regardless of production date, until more is known, and we removed them several days ago.

Like it was a week ago, we have breaking news on Friday afternoon, so there will be some difficulties keeping up to date on the latest information over the weekend. Menu's people are working 24/7, but are still having trouble keeping up.

Open Original Shared Link

georgie Enthusiast
Apparently the poison was on wheat imported from China. Pretty darned scary! What are the chances that this wheat has been used in products for human consumption as well?

Another good reason to stay away from wheat! You don't know where its come from. What's wrong with American wheat or even Australian wheat that we know is safe !

I try to feed my dog as little commercial food as possible. You just don't know what's in it. My thoughts are with those people that lost their beloved pets.

  • 2 weeks later...
shayesmom Rookie
A specific toxin, Open Original Shared Link, has been identified in samples of the affected food by an independant laboratory. This is a chemical used in some places as a rodent poison, but it is not permitted for that purpose in either Canada or the US. It is used in treatment of some cancers on a limited basis.

Not to be sarcastic here....but does anyone else here wonder about the rationale behind using this chemical for cancer treatment? Considering the effect on animals....is anyone wondering why we're no closer to winning the "war" on cancer?

Aminopterin was used in the past for cancer treatment and was so toxic that it was eventually pulled as an anti-cancer agent (several decades ago). I see that it is back in clinical trials once more. Pathetic. Truly, pathetic.

psawyer Proficient

The information in this thread is more than one week old, and is no longer current. Aminopterin is no longer thought to be the problem, rather, on March 30, high levels of melamine were found in the wheat gluten in question.

Open Original Shared Link

BTW, various animals react differently to substances and differently than humans. For example, acetaminophen is a lethal poison to cats, but humans take it all the time for pain relief.

shayesmom Rookie
The information in this thread is more than one week old, and is no longer current. Aminopterin is no longer thought to be the problem, rather, on March 30, high levels of melamine were found in the wheat gluten in question.

Open Original Shared Link

BTW, various animals react differently to substances and differently than humans. For example, acetaminophen is a lethal poison to cats, but humans take it all the time for pain relief.

Thanks for the updated information and link. I do understand that different substances affect humans and animals differently. However, there's plenty of information of deadly toxicity attributed to aminopterin in cancer patients. And although acetaminophen is generally "safe"....if a human takes too much, it can lead to acute liver failure. We've been seeing this happening with infants and children given a combination of pain killers and cough medicines (both of which contain it)...hence the news stories telling parents not to give these meds in combination to their children.

Also, I wonder at the reasoning behind using wheat gluten in pet foods at all (besides it being economical). Back in the 50's, it was generally recognized that wheat gluten was detrimental to dogs. It was only introduced into the pet food supply when China began growing their own wheat and not buying ours that we ended up with a glut of wheat and it was put into dog food. It's also known that breeds such as the Irish Setter have been diagnosed with Celiac Disease. I wonder if other breeds have been tested?

2kids4me Contributor

In reply to those concerned about why testing isnt performed for everything. First of all in order to test for somethig you have to know what you are testing for....there are thousands of chemicals in this world that can contamiante food, either in growing it, transporting it or preparing it.

To provide an example to which we can all relate:

If you have celiac or lyme or diabetes or MS or lupus or sjogrens or any of the over 80 autimmune diseases but no one tests for it, they wouldnt know it was there. They do have tests for all those but they arent going to test each patient for everything. Also, those disease existed long before they were able to test for them - but without a test or knowledge of the disease they can't test for it.

When they test for contamination - like in this case, they take logical approach and look for any common items (fertilizers, fungicides, poisons) first, then they look for oddball items, but they dont just test for anything and everything all at once, the cost would be prohibitive. I heard on the news that the reason amniopterin was thought to be the culprit and later disproven had to do with the type of tests the one lab was doing and that aminopterin and an amnio acid supplement have similar fatty acid chains on analysis. (or something along those lines).

An excellent point made by previous poster - a substance not poisonous to people can be deadly to pets. Onions should never be added to pet food so if they accidently made their way into pet food - the pets would get sick, cats will die from acetominophen as well as eating Easter lilly plants (they cause kidney failure)....potatoe leaves and tomatoe leaves make pets sick

so a lab would also have to check for everything from synthetic poisons to accidental contamination with plant material that is harmful to a particular species.......

hope this helps

Sandy

And although acetaminophen is generally "safe"....if a human takes too much, it can lead to acute liver failure.

Yes that is true with water too - you can drink too much water and die. With cats, pet owners must understand that it is not an overdose that kills cat, a single dose kills them by binding the hemoglobin in therir blood and they die of a lack a of oxygen...slowly.

The thing is even after they thought they found the cause, they kept checking and found the melamine. They are being thorough.

Pet food manufacturers are becoming more concious of eliminating wheat gluten form some lines ( but not all).

An WHY are we not just as upset about all the chemicals put into foods for human consumption? Why on earth would anyone eat a twinkie? :unsure:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,311
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    SWilson
    Newest Member
    SWilson
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Cathijean90! I went 13 years from the first laboratory evidence of celiac disease onset before I was diagnosed. But there were symptoms of celiac disease many years before that like a lot of gas. The first laboratory evidence was a rejected Red Cross blood donation because of elevated liver enzymes. They assume you have hepatitis if your liver enzymes are elevated. But I was checked for all varieties of hepatitis and that wasn't it. Liver enzymes continued to slowly creep up for another 13 years and my PCP tested me for a lot of stuff and it was all negative. He ran out of ideas. By that time, iron stores were dropping as was albumin and total protein. Finally, I took it upon myself to schedule an appointment with a GI doc and the first thing he did was test me for celiac disease. I was positive of course. After three months of gluten free eating the liver enzymes were back in normal range. That was back in about 1992. Your story and mine are more typical than not. I think the average time to diagnosis from the onset of symptoms and initial investigation into causes for symptom is about 10 years. Things are improving as there is more general awareness in the medical community about celiac disease than there used to be years ago. The risk of small bowel lymphoma in the celiac population is 4x that of the general population. That's the bad news is.  The good news is, it's still pretty rare as a whole. Yes, absolutely! You can expect substantial healing even after all these years if you begin to observe a strict gluten free diet. Take heart! But I have one question. What exactly did the paperwork from 15 years ago say about your having celiac disease? Was it a test result? Was it an official diagnosis? Can you share the specifics please? If you have any celiac blood antibody test results could you post them, along with the reference ranges for each test? Did you have an endoscopy/biopsy to confirm the blood test results?
    • Cathijean90
      I’ve just learned that I had been diagnosed with celiac and didn’t even know. I found it on paperwork from 15 years ago. No idea how this was missed by every doctor I’ve seen after the fact. I’m sitting here in tears because I have really awful symptoms that have been pushed off for years onto other medical conditions. My teeth are now ruined from vomiting, I have horrible rashes on my hands, I’ve lost a lot of weight, I’m always in pain, I haven’t had a period in about 8-9 months. I’m so scared. I have children and I saw it can cause cancer, infertility, heart and liver problems😭 I’ve been in my room crying for the last 20minutes praying. This going untreated for so long has me feeling like I’m ruined and it’s going to take me away from my babies. I found this site googling and I don’t know really what has me posting this besides wanting to hear from others that went a long time with symptoms but still didn’t know to quit gluten. I’m quitting today, I won’t touch gluten ever again and I’m making an appointment somewhere to get checked for everything that could be damaged. Is this an automatic sentence for cancer and heart/liver damage after all these symptoms and years? Is there still a good chance that quitting gluten and being proactive from here on out that I’ll be okay? That I could still heal myself and possibly have more children? Has anyone had it left untreated for this amount of time and not had cancer, heart, fertility issues or liver problems that couldn’t be fixed? I’m sure I sound insane but my anxiety is through the roof. I don’t wanna die 😭 I don’t want something taking me from my babies. I’d gladly take anyone’s advice or hear your story of how long you had it before being diagnosed and if you’re still okay? 
    • trents
      Genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out and also to establish the potential to develop celiac disease. About 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% actually develop it. To develop celiac disease when you have the genetic potential also requires some kind of trigger to turn the latent genes "on", as it were. The trigger can be a lot of things and is the big mystery component of the celiac disease puzzle at this point in time with regard to the state of our knowledge.  Your IGA serum score would seem to indicate you are not IGA deficient and your tTG-IGA score looks to be in the normal range but in the future please include the reference ranges for negative vs. positive because different labs used different reference ranges. There is no industry standard.
    • Scott Adams
      Since nearly 40% of the population have the genes for celiac disease, but only ~1% end up getting it, a genetic test will only tell you that it is possible that you could one day get celiac disease, it would not be able to tell whether you currently have it or not.
    • KDeL
      so much to it.  the genetic testing will help if i don’t have it right? If theres no gene found then I definitely don’t have celiac?  I guess genetic testing, plus ruling out h.pylori, plus gluten challenge will be a good way to confirm yes or no for celiac. 
×
×
  • Create New...