Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genetic Variants


JerryK

Recommended Posts

JerryK Community Regular

So at first when I found out I was HLA-DQ 3,1 subtype 7,5 it was a relief because I KNEW I was not Celiac. However this last week I've been rethinking that. Just this week we've seen one 3,1 person have a positive diagnosis and another with a negative blood panel have a positive biopsy.

Someone else posted that they think DQ 3,1 subtype 7,5 is almost identical to DQ8....

Based upon that, EVEN WITH the data that I already have, it's obvious that I don't know and without a biopsy, will never know if I'm truly Celiac. I've been telling my family and my brother that I KNOW I'm not Celiac, but maybe that's not true?

I'm wondering how many unrecognized Celiac gene variants are out there and what you folks think about that? Should I believe I don't have Celiac or should I believe that I'm Gluten Intolerant but that Celiac was unproven? It's my opinion that I have it...based upon the way my body reacts...call it what you want..

Hope everyone is having a great day! j


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

Well, studying genetics is what I do for a living, so what follows is my OPINION, but is an educated one.

"Celiac" has been defined as a disease that destroys your intestine. This destruction happens in conjunction with a specific HLA structure. Therefor, this specific structure has been identified as "The Celiac Gene(s)" (the pertinent part of the structure is the same, even though the genes are different).

It is my opinion that the proper definition of Celiac should be "an auto-antibody response to gliadins and other related prolamine structures".

If this is in fact the correct definition, that would mean the the "Celiac Gene(s)" haven't been found. All they've found are the genes that destroy your intestine when you ALSO have the Celiac gene(s).

People that get villus destruction and have different HLA haplotypes might be having a technically different sort of destructive process going on. (Maybe some eventual outcome of long term auto-antibody presence in the body.)

Since Celiac can lead to kidney destruction, islet cell destruction and nerve cell destruction, this isn't a far-fetched idea.

In my opinion, all you've learned is that you are less likely to have your intestine destroyed if you keep eating gluten. What you haven't learned is what other body parts you will destroy.

JerryK Community Regular
Well, studying genetics is what I do for a living, so what follows is my OPINION, but is an educated one.

Wow I didn't know that..I'm impressed! Can you tell me why if we have the same genes, my brother is so much more homely than I? :lol:

In all seriousness thanks for your comments. If you can think of anything else I should know about my particular HLA, I'd like to know. j

Jestgar Rising Star

If you are monozygotic (and a lot aren't, they just look the same), you still haven't been genetically identical since moments after your embryo split into two. DNA is modified throughout our lifetimes (like protein filters applied that lets certain sections be read and covers up other sections). So depending on what order you were attached to the placenta, you each got different chemical stimuli from your mom during gestation. And after birth you've both experienced very different things. Each experience (emotion, smell, food, learning, whatever) causes a slight modification of the DNA, which leads to slightly different protein ratios, which ultimately leads to different beings.

You apparently got all the "turn out cute" experiences. :)

lonewolf Collaborator

This is all very interesting to me. I'm definitely not knowledgable about genetics, but have a theory that DQ2 and 8 are the genes that predispose someone to have intestinal damage with gluten intolerance. Since the intestinal damage seems to be the easiest thing to test, it's what gets a diagnosis.

My son is double DQ3, subtype 7, so I know that I have at least one of the same. I have so many symptoms of celiac that I was positive that my gene test would come back with DQ2 or 8, so I could officially be called Celiac. It came back negative. Two of my kids are obviously gluten intolerant, one of them is MUCH shorter than we expected and has minor digestive issues and a few other symptoms and my son has digestive and behavioral issues that have cleared up completely by going gluten-free.

I'd been diagnosed with "colitis" and IBS in college, had so many cavities as a kid that I couldn't possibly count (now, my teeth are almost transparent), have psoriasis, developed debilitating arthritis, hypothyroid and the list could go on. All signs of Celiac. Going gluten-free (along with dairy-free, egg-free and soy-free) cleared almost everything up. Trying to reintroduce gluten grains several years ago was disastrous. I developed an autoimmune kidney disease and discovered on my own that it was gluten related. My nephrologist thinks I'm nuts for not taking his medications and can't figure out why I'm in remission (3 years now) and why I think that eating gluten-free has anything to do with it.

Sorry to ramble. To answer your question, Jerry - I think you're totally gluten intolerant, probably Celiac. Consider yourself Celiac and stick with the diet. Hopefully there will be some research down the road that "proves" to everyone (family, doctors, yourself) that you have something "real".

Nancym Enthusiast

Clearly they haven't discovered everything there is to know about gluten sensitivity!

Jestgar, I'm reading "Genetics for Dummies" and enjoying it, even if I am a little confused at time. Can you explain what the difference is between an allele and a gene? They've done a lousy job explaining that so far.

Also, I thought of Jerry when I read this article, it is about semi-identical twins.

Open Original Shared Link

One egg... 2 sperm.

Jestgar Rising Star

A gene is the name for the section of DNA that encodes a certain protein. Allele is used when the coding is different, but the protein is basically the same.

Like having two houses painted two different colors (because you have two of each gene; one from each parent). Each house is a gene, but you have the red allele, and the green allele.

So unless you are albino, you have a gene for hair color. I have at least one brown allele, my sister has two blond alleles. My parents each have one brown and one blond allele.

Does that help?

I saw that article - very cool!! We actually use twins in our studies, it's really fascinating.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Nantzie Collaborator

I have two copies of DQ1, subtype 6. My kids both have 1,6 and 3,7. So my husband must have at least one copy of 3,7.

I've seen a lot of the 1,6 and the 3,7 being mentioned by people here, so I know those are definitely genes that cause severe problems.

Nancy

Nancym Enthusiast
A gene is the name for the section of DNA that encodes a certain protein. Allele is used when the coding is different, but the protein is basically the same.

Like having two houses painted two different colors (because you have two of each gene; one from each parent). Each house is a gene, but you have the red allele, and the green allele.

So unless you are albino, you have a gene for hair color. I have at least one brown allele, my sister has two blond alleles. My parents each have one brown and one blond allele.

Does that help?

I saw that article - very cool!! We actually use twins in our studies, it's really fascinating.

Yeah! I think so. I'll need to reread some things and see if they make more sense now.

JerryK Community Regular
Yeah! I think so. I'll need to reread some things and see if they make more sense now.

Yes thanks again for clearing ALL that up. :lol:

Jestgar Rising Star

Well if you and your bro are ever going to be in Seattle for a few days, come be part of our study.

Open Original Shared Link

Only the people drawing blood actually know who you are, so I wouldn't be able to tell you anything about yourself, but, you know, all the "betterment of the world" stuff.

GlutenWrangler Contributor

I have DQ1, subtype 5, and DQ3, subtype 9, and I have celiac disease, not just gluten intolerance. So that being said, there are definitely other variants out there. It is ridiculous for a doctor to say, "you can't have celiac disease because you don't have DQ2 or DQ8". That's just plain ignorance. I'm sure in time, other genes and factors will be identified and recognized.

-Brian

kookaburra Rookie
I have two copies of DQ1, subtype 6. My kids both have 1,6 and 3,7. So my husband must have at least one copy of 3,7.

I've seen a lot of the 1,6 and the 3,7 being mentioned by people here, so I know those are definitely genes that cause severe problems.

Nancy

My son is double DQB1 (only one was identified, it was 06). Let me know if you learn anything more about double DQ1! My son has classic celiac symptoms including heavy on the neurological symptoms, but I've been told since he doesn't have DQ2 and DQ8 that he doesn't have celiac. I think there is some debate on this, but I'm unclear on it...

JerryK Community Regular
I have DQ1, subtype 5, and DQ3, subtype 9, and I have celiac disease, not just gluten intolerance. So that being said, there are definitely other variants out there. It is ridiculous for a doctor to say, "you can't have celiac disease because you don't have DQ2 or DQ8". That's just plain ignorance. I'm sure in time, other genes and factors will be identified and recognized.

-Brian

Interesting data. I was just going off of what Dr. Fine at Enterolab said. Sounds like he doesn't know everything. I will stop taking it as fact that I don't have Celiac...I just don't know and likely never will.

pedro Explorer

Hello Jerry.

I have the same problem. I've come to a realization if I have celiac or gluten intolerance I will stick to the diet just incase. To be in safe side. I too have three childrens girls, and there is not one minute I think about all this and the implications. From my father's side of the family I have so many people with the same problems, same symptoms. It goes back all the way to my great grandfather.

Best regards to everyone.

So at first when I found out I was HLA-DQ 3,1 subtype 7,5 it was a relief because I KNEW I was not Celiac. However this last week I've been rethinking that. Just this week we've seen one 3,1 person have a positive diagnosis and another with a negative blood panel have a positive biopsy.

Someone else posted that they think DQ 3,1 subtype 7,5 is almost identical to DQ8....

Based upon that, EVEN WITH the data that I already have, it's obvious that I don't know and without a biopsy, will never know if I'm truly Celiac. I've been telling my family and my brother that I KNOW I'm not Celiac, but maybe that's not true?

I'm wondering how many unrecognized Celiac gene variants are out there and what you folks think about that? Should I believe I don't have Celiac or should I believe that I'm Gluten Intolerant but that Celiac was unproven? It's my opinion that I have it...based upon the way my body reacts...call it what you want..

Hope everyone is having a great day! j

hathor Contributor
My son is double DQB1 (only one was identified, it was 06). Let me know if you learn anything more about double DQ1! My son has classic celiac symptoms including heavy on the neurological symptoms, but I've been told since he doesn't have DQ2 and DQ8 that he doesn't have celiac. I think there is some debate on this, but I'm unclear on it...

I have run across conversations where people say they have heard about double DQ1 being looked at as another marker for celiac disease, or a marker for gluten intolerance with neurological symptoms anyway, but finding the actual studies people are recalling is another matter!

What I've seen is this:

"IgG anti-gliadin antibodies have been the best diagnostic marker in the neurological population we have studied. IgG anti-gliadin antibodies have a very high sensitivity for celiac disease but they are said to lack specificity. In the context of a range of mucosal abnormalities and the concept of potential celiac disease, they may be the only available immunological marker for the whole range of gluten sensitivity of which celiac disease is only a part. Further support for our contention comes from our HLA studies. Within the group of patients with neurological disease and gluten sensitivity (defined by the presence of anti-gliadin antibodies) we have found a similar HLA association to that seen in patients with celiac disease: 70% of patients have the HLA DQ2 (30% in the general population), 9% have the HLA DQ8, and the remainder have HLA DQ1. The finding of an additional HLA marker (DQ1) seen in the remaining 20% of our patients may represent an important difference between the genetic susceptibility of patients with neurological presentation to those with gastrointestinal presentation within the range of gluten sensitivity."

Open Original Shared Link

confused Community Regular

I have run across conversations where people say they have heard about double DQ1 being looked at as another marker for celiac disease, or a marker for gluten intolerance with neurological symptoms anyway, but finding the actual studies people are recalling is another matter!

I had thought i had found other articles about the DQ1 double, but everyone just went back to the one i posted from Dr H., I have been trying to find them all again, they were on my puter that crashed over the weekend.

paula

nora-n Rookie

Via www.pubmed.com I have seen 2 articles by Dr. Hadjivassiliou where he specifically mentions DQ1 and gluten and nevrological symptoms and Ttg antibodies.

I have even seen more articles online, but the links are via the braitalk or neurotalk forum.

Several people that are DQ1 do post there.

DQ1 are: DQ1, DQ5 DQ6, or the other nomenclature: DQ1 subtype 5 or 6,

or DQ1,5 or DQ1,6 or 1.

A bit confusing.

(DQ3 are subtyes 7, 8 and 9 and 3)

nora

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,113
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ang99
    Newest Member
    Ang99
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Zuma888
      Hello, I was diagnosed with Hashimoto's thyroiditis about 3 years ago. At that time I quit gluten and it really helped my symptoms. I hadn't known that I should've tested for celiac before doing so.  Up till recently, gluten would cause my symptoms to flare up, although I never noticed anything with cross contamination, so I wasn't strict about that. But recently, I noticed I could get away with more gluten, and so I decided to do a gluten challenge to see if I had celiac and if I had to be strict. Note that my thyroid antibodies had been decreasing steadily up to this point. My anti-TPO had reached 50 IU/ml from 250 IU/ml (reference range 0-5.6) when I had first been diagnosed. After just a week of the gluten challenge, I measured my thyroid antibodies and they were at 799 IU/ml! I felt fine, but a few days after I started to feel the symptoms. Extreme brain fog, insomnia, diarheaa, fatigue, sleepiness yet cannot sleep, stomachache after eating gluten, nausea, swollen throat (probably due to my thyroid), burping, and gas. I cannot function properly. I'm also worried that I'm killing my thyroid. Should I just quit the challenge? It's been almost two weeks, but the first week I wasn't tracking well, so that's why I didn't want to count it. I can't eat gluten anyway because of my thyroid, but I wanted the diagnosis to know if I should be strict about cross contamination or not.  
    • Zuma888
      You really saved me as I was on day 4 of 3 g per day for 6 weeks. Thank you very much!
    • trents
      Two weeks is the minimum according to the guideline. I would go for four weeks if you can endure it, just to make sure.
    • Zuma888
      Thank you so much! So I can do 10 g worth of gluten in the form of gluten powder per day for two weeks and that should be enough?
    • trents
      It applies to both blood tests and biopsies. Guidelines for the gluten challenge have been revised for the very issue your question raises. It was felt by medical professionals that the longer term but less intense consumption of gluten approach was not proving to be reliable for testing purposes and was resulting in too many false negatives. But do keep in mind that the gluten consumption doesn't have to be in the form of bread slices. It can come in any form: pasta, cake, wraps, etc. Another approach would be to buy gluten powder at a health food store and mix it in a shake. The idea is to get at least 10g of gluten daily, whatever form it comes in.
×
×
  • Create New...