Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy For 10 Year Old


nothungry

Recommended Posts

nothungry Contributor

My ten year old is scheduled for biopsy this week...because of a positive EMA and TTG. The doctor gave me a choice - outpatient biopsy in the endoscopy unit, or in the surgery unit with general anastetic (spelling?). I chose outpatient.

Did I make the safest choice for my child? Any input or experience with the procedure on a child would be helpful. Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor
My ten year old is scheduled for biopsy this week...because of a positive EMA and TTG. The doctor gave me a choice - outpatient biopsy in the endoscopy unit, or in the surgery unit with general anastetic (spelling?). I chose outpatient.

Did I make the safest choice for my child? Any input or experience with the procedure on a child would be helpful. Thanks.

I did the out patient. They gave me something to knock me out and went to sleep. I had no probems and would do it again with ease if needed. Child or adult, I was assume to proceedure would be the same.

HawkFire Explorer

I see no need for the endoscopy as far as the child is concerned. Perhaps the doctor is benefiting, but the child is not. That is my opinion. I am against unnecessary endoscopy. Your doctor is simply "playing" in my opinion. Your child will remember this procedure because he is old enough to. No, no, no. I would not do it.

Lisa Mentor

Hawk Fire does have a point. Your son has tested positive by blood work. That should be a diagnosis in itself. The endo may not be necessary.

What are the reasons for requesting the endoscopy? Perhaps there is more questions your doctor may have.

If , by blood work, he is positive for Celiac. He does have Celiac. And you can begin the gluten free diet.

JamiD Apprentice

I just had an endoscopy as an outpatient in the GI lab a couple of weeks ago. I was very anxious and remember abdominal pain and fighting the procedure. I don't recall the following colonscopy at all. I rec'd Versed and Fentanyl. My sister, who is a nurse anesthetist, performs anethesia for endoscopys in the OR and told me she usually gives propophyll (sp) as well and her patients are completely unaware of the procedure.

I'm getting my 8 yr old son blood tested next week, and depending on the results, I may also go the enterolab route as well. I will not have an endoscopy done for confirmation purposes only. Only if he was acutely ill and it was necessary to know how to treat him.

Good luck in your decision and the best for your child.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I had one child who had the endo and we skipped the it with the rest of us. I am also of the opinion that unless he has problems that are not celiac related, or that do not clear up after 6 months strictly gluten-free an endo is not needed. If I had to have it done I would make sure it was under general anesthesia.

nothungry Contributor

The doctor said that the only way to get a confirmed diagnosis is with a biopsy. I believe my child does have celiac because of strong family history. The doctor said that if a prescription should become available insurance would not cover it unless my child was confirmed by biopsy.

I am concerned that a biopsy may not be necessary, it is a difficult decision to make - - any input will definitely be helpful.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



HawkFire Explorer
The doctor said that the only way to get a confirmed diagnosis is with a biopsy. I believe my child does have celiac because of strong family history. The doctor said that if a prescription should become available insurance would not cover it unless my child was confirmed by biopsy.

I am concerned that a biopsy may not be necessary, it is a difficult decision to make - - any input will definitely be helpful.

Oh, I do not like your doctor one bit. He is making excuses. I would run from him. I tell you this as a mother of three. I am only looking out for your child's best interest, just as you are.

alison h Newbie

my nine year old had a biopsy under anesthesia...it was quick and painless...no biggie. I would definately recommend a biopsy to be 100% sure - as someone pointed out only the biopsy gives you 100% certainty. Actually my daughter had to have hers repeated last week, to see if the diet was working (as she is not growing or gaining any weight since we began the diet). Turns out that the diet has made a big difference, but that there seems to be another problem...some allergy perhaps. We are doing more blood tests to confirm what it could be.

Is your child on the small side?

Good luck

HawkFire Explorer
my nine year old had a biopsy under anesthesia...it was quick and painless...no biggie. I would definately recommend a biopsy to be 100% sure - as someone pointed out only the biopsy gives you 100% certainty. Actually my daughter had to have hers repeated last week, to see if the diet was working (as she is not growing or gaining any weight since we began the diet). Turns out that the diet has made a big difference, but that there seems to be another problem...some allergy perhaps. We are doing more blood tests to confirm what it could be.

Is your child on the small side?

Good luck

This is not true. Furthermore, a biopsy can miss damage. The "gold standard" of a biopsy is no longer a gold standard. It's archaic to keep hanging on to this outdated idea. It shows a doctor who is not up to speed.

nothungry Contributor

No, my child is not on the small side at all. I have her tested yearly, the past two years were negative, this year it was positive. She does seem to have symptoms, which confirms to me that she is has celiac too.

wolfie Enthusiast

My 10 yr old DS had the biopsy/endoscopy under general anesthesia last July. He did fine. However, we have been testing my 4 yr old DD and I don't know that I would repeat that unless they were looking for other issues. The main reason I went ahead with it for DS is that I am not biopsy confirmed (went gluten-free after bloodwork before I knew better) but do have a very positive dietary response, and if he was going to have to commit to this for life (and to get DH to go along) we needed the confirmation.

nothungry Contributor
My 10 yr old DS had the biopsy/endoscopy under general anesthesia last July. He did fine. However, we have been testing my 4 yr old DD and I don't know that I would repeat that unless they were looking for other issues. The main reason I went ahead with it for DS is that I am not biopsy confirmed (went gluten-free after bloodwork before I knew better) but do have a very positive dietary response, and if he was going to have to commit to this for life (and to get DH to go along) we needed the confirmation.

Would you have had your DS biopsied if you were a biopsy confirmed celiac ?(as I am one, so are other family members of mine). I believe that with our family history and a tTG of 26 she is positively a celiac. Would you agree?

wolfie Enthusiast
Would you have had your DS biopsied if you were a biopsy confirmed celiac ?(as I am one, so are other family members of mine). I believe that with our family history and a tTG of 26 she is positively a celiac. Would you agree?

That is a tough one, but probably not. Especially with positive ttg. Jon's ttg was 222 (was supposed to be under 20).

Also, remember that the endoscopy/biopsy can only rule in Celiac, it can't rule it out. If there is patchy damage in the intestine, it could be missed.

Good luck and let us know what you decide.

happygirl Collaborator

I would have your child biopsied. This is the only time that your child has the opportunity to have it done, otherwise, they will have to go back to eating gluten to have it done. You have the opportunity to have a "gold standard" diagnosis and it does make life easier for many people. I do not have a positive biopsy and have encountered a lot of problems with the medical community because of it.

I would do the outpatient...its a quick procedure. Plus, this way, they can check for any other problems or rule other things out. The endo isn't "just" about Celiac. When you have the biopsies done, make sure they take multiple biopsies in multiple sites.

nothungry Contributor

When my child initially found out about her positive test, she would not eat gluten at all. Her Gastroenterologist appt. was three weeks later. He said put her on two crackers per day of gluten, that will be enough for the biopsy. Well, we did that for a week, she was sick for a week - so I could not make her eat gluten, and now the biopsy is in a few days. I am quite concerned that if I do the biopsy it will not show damage anyway - because she has not been eating much if any gluten at all for the past 5 or 6 weeks. So, while I am convinced that she has celiac and I would like it to be confirmed, but I'm not sure it needs to be. Any thoughts?

HawkFire Explorer
When my child initially found out about her positive test, she would not eat gluten at all. Her Gastroenterologist appt. was three weeks later. He said put her on two crackers per day of gluten, that will be enough for the biopsy. Well, we did that for a week, she was sick for a week - so I could not make her eat gluten, and now the biopsy is in a few days. I am quite concerned that if I do the biopsy it will not show damage anyway - because she has not been eating much if any gluten at all for the past 5 or 6 weeks. So, while I am convinced that she has celiac and I would like it to be confirmed, but I'm not sure it needs to be. Any thoughts?

The idea that you need a biopsy to confirm celiac is outdated. I am simply stunned that you still are undecided. I was heartbroken for your child to read of her conviction not to eat gluten only to have her resolve destroyed by this doctor. No one goes through all of this to become vegan. This is a diet. She has the blood tests clearly indicating celiac disease. She has celiac disease. There is no doubt. There are only more tests that someone will profit from and get practice doing. I am stating without any doubt that this test is not needed at this point. It is poor medicine for that doctor to claim she needs this test. Walk away from that doctor. If a prescription should become available??? What prescription? How about this- when a prescription becomes available, they will have very simple tests to rule in or out celiac disease just so they can sell and profit from the sale of their prescription. No one's going to agree to routinely biopsy the population just so they can sell a pill... they will figure out a way to make it a simple blood test... oh, wait! They already have. You do not want the official dx of celiac disease anyway as it makes getting health and life insurance nearly impossible. Her blood tests confirm a dx of celiac disease. Walk quietly away and do not draw attention to it or you will find that is a greater problem for her in the future.

One other very important point I want to address. A biopsy is NO LONGER the GOLD STANDARD. People who are new to this need to understand this.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
When my child initially found out about her positive test, she would not eat gluten at all. Her Gastroenterologist appt. was three weeks later. He said put her on two crackers per day of gluten, that will be enough for the biopsy. Well, we did that for a week, she was sick for a week - so I could not make her eat gluten, and now the biopsy is in a few days. I am quite concerned that if I do the biopsy it will not show damage anyway - because she has not been eating much if any gluten at all for the past 5 or 6 weeks. So, while I am convinced that she has celiac and I would like it to be confirmed, but I'm not sure it needs to be. Any thoughts?

It HAS been confirmed by dietary challenge. As stated and it can not be stated enough the 'Gold Standard' is the old standard, it is not valid unless it is clearly positive. In addition you may even hear that there are minimal changes but she doesn't have celiac. Have her go back and gluten and come see me again if she gets sicker. She has been sick for a week from a few crackers, how much more 'proof' is really needed? You may want to look for a more savvy doctor.

nothungry Contributor
It HAS been confirmed by dietary challenge. As stated and it can not be stated enough the 'Gold Standard' is the old standard, it is not valid unless it is clearly positive. In addition you may even hear that there are minimal changes but she doesn't have celiac. Have her go back and gluten and come see me again if she gets sicker. She has been sick for a week from a few crackers, how much more 'proof' is really needed? You may want to look for a more savvy doctor.

Just to clarify - she was sick due to a virus - but I was not going to give her gluten while she was sick.

I do believe that the doctor wants to do the biopsy because that is what he does. I don't think she really needs it...but I like to hear opinions from other people in my situation. Thanks for all of the input.

HawkFire Explorer

You say you don't think she really needs it... you are right. She doesn't. If you choose to allow her to be available for a doctor who wants to perform a test.. I can't stop you. No one here can. This isn't really about advice. You admit she doesn't need the biopsy. I don't understand why you would even consider it at this point. Perhaps you are intimidated by the doctor? Maybe you are unsure of yourself? I don't know. There is one fact that I am sure of: Your child does not need the biopsy to confirm a dx of celiac disease. She has celiac disease. To go through with the biopsy seems unkind. Best of luck. You child sounds very self aware to attempt to commit to the gluten free lifestyle so enthusiastically. I think she should be encouraged- not forced to eat gluten filled crackers for the sake of the doctor and his test.

I hope your self confidence in this regard allows you to tell the doctor NO.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to Gluten is bad's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      4

      Gluten Free ADHD medications

    2. - Wheatwacked replied to ABP's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      9 year old- questionable results

    3. - gregoryC replied to gregoryC's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      7

      Celebrity Cruise for Gluten Free

    4. - trents replied to ABP's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      9 year old- questionable results

    5. - ABP posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      9 year old- questionable results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,882
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tina.walstad
    Newest Member
    tina.walstad
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      I take Clonidine for blood pressure control.  It is the only one that did not debiltate me.  It also helps with my ADD.  Doctors always turned me down when I requested Ritalin (I am an adult) so it turned out for the best that I reacted badly to all the different BP meds they tried. Originally Clonidine was developed for ADHD adolescents that could not tolerate Ritalin.  
    • Wheatwacked
      You should also have her checked for vitamin deficiencies.   "Iodine's presence in the diet can contribute positively to hair strength and elasticity by maintaining hair follicle cycling and supporting the synthesis of hair shaft components like keratin. Keratin is strong and won't dissolve in diluted acids, alkalines, solvents, or water" "Keratosis pilaris is a benign skin condition characterized by small bumps around hair follicles. It is caused by excess keratin, a protein that forms hair, nails, and skin. Iodine is not directly related to keratosis pilaris, but certain foods can help improve it" It could be deficiency in iodine may be causing the keratosis Polaris.  Insufficient iodine intake affects healing, intellegence skin and nails. The average intake of iodine fell 50% from 1970 to now.  A Medium Urinary Iodine Concentration test will indicate intake.  TSH and T4 will not show iodine intake deficiency until damage is being done. Most newly diagnosed Celiac Disease and other autoimmune diseases are deficient in vitamin D when diagnosed.  Other than bone growth, vitamin D is essential for mental health and the immune system.
    • gregoryC
      Just finished my second celebrity cruise. My first was on one of their oldest ships, it was awesome! Now we have sailed on the edge class. Wow! Not only do they have so many gluten-free options but the selection is mind blowing! Any given day you will have between 5 to 7 different gluten-free cakes to try. Yes that is right, one day at the coffee shop I had to choose between 5 gluten-free cakes not including the several puddings on display. So they gave me a small piece of each. 2 were great, 2 were just good, and 1 I did not enjoy. But never have I had the tough decision of which cake to eat?  These selections are from their normal options available for all guest. In the main dining room they always surprised me with some awesome desserts.  In my opinion the best pizza was on the Millennium class and best buffet on the Edge class. Although these two ship vary in size they are both consistent and serving high quality food from the main dinning room. The edge class gives you 4 “main” dining rooms (all included). I was unsure how this would work with my gluten-free diet? It worked great! I was able to order or see the next night’s menu for each of the four dinning venues finding that very little to no modifications needed to be made due to their extensive gluten free options.  The Millennium and Edge class ships provide the best gluten-free options from any of the cruise lines I have sailed with. You will find a larger selection and options on the edge class ships, however you will not be disappointed with the smaller Millennium class. Which is still my favorite cruise ship to date.   
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @ABP! We can't comment on the test numbers you give as you didn't include the range for negative. Different labs use different units and different ranges. There are no industry standards for this so we need more information. If your daughter doesn't have celiac disease she still could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which some experts believe can be a precursor to celiac disease and is 10x more common than celiac disease. However, there is no test for it yet but it does share many of the same symptoms with celiac disease. Both require complete abstinence from gluten.  It is seldom the case during testing where all tests are positive, even for those who do have celiac disease. This is no different than when diagnosing other medical conditions and that is why it is typical to run numbers of tests that come at things from different angles when seeking to arrive at a diagnosis. It seems like you are at the point, since you have had both blood antibody testing and endoscopy/biopsy done, that you need to trial the gluten free diet. If her symptoms improve then you know all you need to know, whatever you label you want to give it. But given that apparently at least one celiac antibody blood test is positive and she has classic celiac symptoms such as slow growth, constipation and bloating, my money would be on celiac disease as opposed to NCGS.
    • ABP
      My nine-year-old daughter has suffered with severe constipation and bloating for years as well as frequent mouth sores, and keratosis Polaris on her arms. She also has recently decreased on her growth curve her % going down gradually.  After seeing a gastroenterologist, her IgG GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG) was 22.4 while her IGA was normal. Her TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA was 11.9.  Most recently her genetic test for celiac was positive.  After an endoscopy her tissue showed inflammation of the tissue as well as , increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) but there was no blunting of the change in the villi.    It seems that every result that we get one out of two things positive rather than all leading to an inconclusive diagnosis. While we do have another appointment with the doctor to go over the results. I'm curious based on this information what others think.    I would hate to have her eliminate gluten if not necessary- but also don't want to not remove if it is necessary.    Signed Confused and Concerned Mama
×
×
  • Create New...