Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

First Time To Gi--conflicting Information

JennyC

By JennyC
in Doctors

Recommended Posts

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted

My son's pediatrician ordered a full blood panel on my son and it turned out that he had very high tTG levels. He also has had all of the classic celiac symptoms: diarrhea 3+ times a day, abdominal bloating, failure to thrive, lack of appetite, ect. She told me that he has Celiac disease, remove gluten from his diet & to see a pediatric GI. After removing gluten all of his symptoms disappeared--I mean a complete turn around! (He's even gained 3 lbs in the last month!) Well yesterday was the big appointment. I expected him to push for a biopsy, but he spent the entire time trying to convince me to do it. :angry: Everything that the GI told contradicted what I have learned thus far.

In his opinion biopsy is the only way to diagnose Celiac disease. He said that high tTG levels could be caused by other diseases. (He couldn't name any & when I googled it all I came up with was Celiac disease.) He said that celiac disease is not a spotty disease--he always finds it in one spot. If he doesn't find it in that spot during the first and only biopsy performed, then one doesn't have celiac disease and the blood work was falsely positive. :angry: Then from that point a gluten-free diet is entirely elective.

It seems as though he was educated in the stone ages. I've read of people being diagnosed as Celiac without a biopsy, with a negative biopsy, and after multiple biopsies. My son had all the symptoms of celiac disease, he had the celiac-specific blood markers, and he couldn't be responding any better to his new gluten-free diet. I don't want to put him through hell for an entire month for a biopsy! :o I will be seeking a second opinion by another doctor at a different hospital!

Please share your insights. Any input will be greatly appreciated.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

Jenny:

Sounds like you did your homework. Good for you. As his blood work is positive, that is confirmation enough for celiac.

Keep him gluten free and watch him grow. I see no need to stick a tube down his troat to convince the doctor. Sounds like you are on the right track.

wolfie Enthusiast
wolfie
Posted

I completely agree with Momma Goose. Since your son is already gluten-free and doing very well, skip the endoscopy & torture. He obviously has Celiac based on his blood work (ttg) and the positive response.

I think the only other thing that I have read about that can cause high ttg levels is liver damage or something like that. I also asked our Ped about this and he wasn't able to really give me an answer.

mommida Enthusiast
mommida
Posted

You have done the research. You have two valid positive results indicating Celiac. (blood work, and dietary response)

A gluten challenge at this point is risky. The damage being done, might not be enough for the biopsy to detect. The gluten free diet should have started after the diagnoses. Your child could end up severely dehydrated and need I.V. fluids (like my daughter in the same situation) Some say getting medical coverage and life insurance policies are complicated after their Celiac diagnoses.

The drawbacks of not getting the "gold standard official diagnoses", your child may not want to follow the diet if a nonsymptamatic phase happens.

Schools do not want your child having "D" or vomitting in school, they shouldn't give you any problems. Qualifying for lunch program to be gluten free would probably be the snag. (504)

Stick to what you know is right. You've done the research and you know your child.

L.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

All I can really add to the others is that I agree completely with them. This doc is an idiot IMHO. I don't think I would even look for a second opinion at this point. His blood work and dietary response are more than enough. People have also had very serious reactions from gluten challenges once they have been gluten-free for a bit that can be very painful, scary and potentially dangerous.

kbtoyssni Contributor
kbtoyssni
Posted

Good for you standing up to the doctor. It sounds like you've already more than convinced yourself that he's got celiac. I also didn't do the biopsy because by the time I'd done an elimination diet and figured it out I just wanted to get on with getting better.

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all so much for your support. I really hope that people with other diseases have a similar resource. Without you all I would probably be cross contaminating my son and feeding him malt-filled rice crispy treats! :)

I'm concerned about getting the official diagnosis only because I want him to be supervised by a specialist as a celiac patient, so that he will get the appropriate follow up care and be watched for symptoms of other diseases associated with celiac disease.

If when he's older he decides that he might not have celiac, then he can make the choice for himself to go back on gluten and get a biopsy.

I know there are doctors out there who will diagnose without a biopsy, and I intend to try to find one. If I'm not successful, then I will go through his pediatrician for follow up testing.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Nancym Enthusiast
Nancym
Posted

Just remember that the longer he's gluten free the harder it will be to get a biopsy diagnosis. You may only have a window of a few weeks.

Also, what about asking for follow up testing of his ttg on the gluten free diet to confirm it goes down. Seems like that should contribute to the large, growing pool of evidence.

mellajane Explorer
mellajane
Posted

I had been sick since I can remember...very very sick since 7. I am now 30. This celiac is still so new... I was told by a dr. not mine to stop eating wheat for a month I would notice a difference almost immedietly. I did. All of my test have come back negative.....Guess what this is the only thing that has worked in 4 years...I have given up on dr.s.This whole time my whole life I was allergic to wheat. It is a hard disease but the more you know and learn the better life will be.

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted
  • Author
Just remember that the longer he's gluten free the harder it will be to get a biopsy diagnosis. You may only have a window of a few weeks.

Also, what about asking for follow up testing of his ttg on the gluten free diet to confirm it goes down. Seems like that should contribute to the large, growing pool of evidence.

Yes, I do want to get more blood work done. I expected that at his appointment, but all I got was a lecture. I will definitely request it at his next appointment.

Thank you for your advice.

mommida Enthusiast
mommida
Posted

I see your point about having your son treated as a Celiac patient. Have faith , there are some specialist that understand Celiac and know how difficult the diagnoses can be. Can you check with your local Celiac support group for an experinced specialist in your area?

L.

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted
  • Author
I see your point about having your son treated as a Celiac patient. Have faith , there are some specialist that understand Celiac and know how difficult the diagnoses can be. Can you check with your local Celiac support group for an experinced specialist in your area?

L.

That is a great idea. I think that I'm going to look into that now. I'm sure there has to be one.

Thanks.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

One thing you should note is that most of the associated autoimmune and other health problems won't develop if he stays on the gluten free diet. The problems that most of us have are due to years of misdiagnosis and symptom relief only through drugs. Many celiacs gluten free are actually healthier than non-celiacs.

If your main reason for confirmation is because of that fear you may want to take that into consideration.

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted
  • Author

Well, after reading another topic and calling the company I decided that I am going to get the enterolab testing done. I will not biopsy my son because I refuse to poison him for the sake of a test that produces false negatives. It is my sincere hope that I find a pediatric gastro that takes the full gene and stool panel along with previous symptoms and positive dietary response as "proof" of celiac disease. If not, then at least I know what is truly going on inside my son. I refuse to begin a repeated cycle of blood tests and biopsies. I know that this diet has helped my son.

I want all of those who have responded to my numerous posts to know that I am very grateful for the advice you have given. Thank you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,092
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Sujuschneider
    Newest Member
    Sujuschneider
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      69.9k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Delayed reaction

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @RDB7918393! For some folks, gluten reactions are delayed but I would not think symptoms delayed  of a week or more out would be due to a gluten reaction. Twenty four hours or so but not 7-14 days. I would suspect something else is going on. Eating out is well-known to be the number one sabotaging activity of the gluten-free life style. 
    • RDB7918393
      Delayed reaction

      By RDB7918393 · Posted

      I was diagnosed with Celiac about 10 months ago after having on and off morning stomach cramping and loose stool that only occurred like once a month. So I don’t get immediate reactions…more if build up reactions. I do my best to be gluten free but hard when on vacation and going to restaurants to fully trust cross contamination problems. I find that if I’m cross contaminated, I don’t get a reaction til about a week or two after. The reaction is stomach cramping morning only with flaky stool. Does anyone else have such a delayed reaction like a week or two after being glutened? Or should I go for more testing to see what’s going on.
    • ElisaAllergiesgluten
      Polly-O all cheese products are gluten free?

      By ElisaAllergiesgluten · Posted

      Good morning, I saw that a lot of people were asking wether Polly-O products are gluten free. I just called them and all their cheeses are gluten free! Just wanted to let anyone know.    if you still want you can give them a call.
    • Sicilygirl
      Enegy level extremely low

      By Sicilygirl · Posted

      Thank you very much Scott I am glad that there is a light at the end of this tunnel. I am just very impatient and I want to heal asap. I apreciate your honesty in this isnce I am getting absolutely knowhere with the medical system. A year or more? God help me this is hard. But, I am so grateful that I found a site like your that can help me and put my mind at ease in all of this. An you started this and you are ghelping alot of us get through this little by little. I thank you for starting this. Is there a cure coming that you know of? I am in Canada and there is nothing here.   Sophia    
    • Scott Adams
      Rice, corn, and other gluten-free grains.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your approach is spot-on—trusting reliable sources like Mayo Clinic and sticking to a gluten-free diet that works for you is the best way to navigate all the noise out there. The claim that rice and corn contain forms of gluten harmful to celiacs is indeed a misconception. While these grains do contain proteins that may technically be referred to as "glutens" in a broader scientific sense, they are structurally and functionally different from the gliadin found in wheat, which is the specific protein harmful to those with celiac disease. Scientific research overwhelmingly supports the safety of non-contaminated rice and corn for celiacs unless there’s a separate sensitivity or allergy involved. Some opinion pieces or alternative health sources may blur the lines by conflating these proteins, which can cause unnecessary worry. You're absolutely correct to focus on the distinction between scientifically validated information and anecdotal claims. It's also important to note that some people with celiac disease may develop sensitivities to other grains over time, but this is individual and not a universal rule. If you’re asymptomatic and thriving on a diet that includes certified gluten-free products with rice and corn, there’s no reason to change what’s clearly working for you. The internet is a breeding ground for well-meaning but misguided advice, and it’s easy to feel overwhelmed. Your instinct to validate claims through reliable research is exactly the right way to go. Keep enjoying your gluten-free meals, stick with trusted certifications, and don’t feel pressured to adopt restrictive diets that aren’t backed by science or tailored to your specific needs. Happy New Year to you too!
×
×
  • Create New...