Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab--what's The Scoop?


woolwhippet

Recommended Posts

woolwhippet Explorer

I am considering ordering the tests from enterolab. I am wondering if anyone had negative blood test and a positive enterolab result. I am also wondering which test I really need. Is it worth it to do the full gene/gluten/dairy or ???

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



holiday16 Enthusiast
I am considering ordering the tests from enterolab. I am wondering if anyone had negative blood test and a positive enterolab result. I am also wondering which test I really need. Is it worth it to do the full gene/gluten/dairy or ???

Thanks!

I had a negative blood test, but tested positive through Enterolab. I know some people debate them, but for me I would never have known what was wrong without that test and it was the answer I needed after 7 years of being absolutely miserable. I still find it hard to believe I was as bad off as I was and the blood test still came back negative. I tested barely positive even through Enterolab and when I asked the NP that ordered the test about it she said some people just produce less antibodies, but it is not an indication at all of severity.

My dad, mother and brother did the test as well. My dad and brother tested positive and my mother tested negative. They also did the gene test and my brother and mother both have the DQ8 gene. My dad has a double DQ7 and he has seen improvement neurologically. I did not do the gene test and wish I had, but the only real reason would be to satisfy my curiousity as it really does not affect the diagnosis. We also found that my dd's stomach issues cleared up being gluten free so we determined without testing that she is gluten intolerant as well. My Dr. agrees with that because we had taken her in twice because her stomach hurt so bad and she was diagnosed with contipation, but when she went gluten free that resolved. It comes back if she has gluten and she will double over in pain.

celiacgirls Apprentice

My younger daughter had several negative blood tests over the years but was positive with Enterolab. My older daughter and I then tested with Enterolab and were positive also. All of us feel much better gluten free.

I started with just the gluten antibody test for all of us. I ended up doing the full panel with the casein test for everyone. I tested my genes but haven't done my children yet. There really isn't a need to do it but I am curious.

I think the tests were worth it because I would never have tried the diet without it. I probably wouldn't have been as strict with my daughter's diet without the Enterolab test. I do think you could just try eliminating gluten (every trace) and see if it worked for you. The diet response is what ultimately convinced me.

Pacer Rookie

Holiday, you have a really supportive family that would go and do that testing. I have to say, DH's family is in total denial and tries to feed him bread when we visit.

"oh, you still got THAT?" LOL

Meanwhile, it would be a really helpful piece of info for future generations if they could know which side the celiac came from.

Heidi

GeoffCJ Enthusiast

I had a negative blood test, but tried a diet and saw dramatic improvement.

6-8 weeks later I did a endoscopy, which showed clear damage, but not clear Celiacs. I had been gluten free/lite for several months at that point, which I think explains the ambiguity. My silly Dr. didn't tell me I needed to eat gluten, and the first time I met the GI specialist was about 3 minutes before he put the camera down my throat. He asked if I'd been eating gluten, I said no, and he responded "well, this test is going to be of limited value". He still found areas that looked really raw/ugly, but not clear flattening. I think I was partly healed. He said the same, and suggested that I needed to stay gluten free. No idea what my charts say.

I did the enterolab. It came back positive for the antibodies, negative for casein/soy/etc. I have the double gene.

At this point I consider myself a celiac.

Geoff

chocolatelover Contributor

There are a great number of people who have negative blood work and/or a negative biopsy, and for many reasons...

Through a regular GI I tested negative with bloodwork and also had a negative biopsy. However, I tested positive through Enterolab, and also found out through them that I have double celiac genes. I also had a colonoscopy that showed lymphocytic colitis, which is highly related to celiac.

With those results in hand, I took them to a new GI, who diagnosed me as having celiac even without the positive blood work or biopsy (the combination of the three above factors, plus the fact that I had been almost completely off gluten for 4 months before the blood work and biopsy). Those results from Enterolab helped convince him that I need to be off gluten now and forever to not only feel better, heal the damage, and also reduce my risk of cancer. That was enough to make me go gluten free, and I feel 1000% better for it.

I found it extremely helpful to get tested through Enterolab--I would never have pursued things this far had I not done that. Which tests you do are up to you, but I definitely think it was worth it.

par18 Apprentice
Holiday, you have a really supportive family that would go and do that testing. I have to say, DH's family is in total denial and tries to feed him bread when we visit.

"oh, you still got THAT?" LOL

Meanwhile, it would be a really helpful piece of info for future generations if they could know which side the celiac came from.

Heidi

I agree it would be helpful if you could get anyone to listen to you. I got my mother gene tested (she and I have DQ2 but only I have had symptoms and was diagnosed with Celiac Disease) and we notified her side of the family. Basically no one really cared. Some I am sure have Celiac-type issues but all would rather blame it on something else. I would venture to estimate that for every one person who listens to what you have to say and may one day act upon the advice there are many who still want to spend a lot of money to hear it from a medical profession that is currently operating at a 5% diagnosing rate! Still I would suggest finding out which side of the family (if not both) could possibly have the gene.

Tom


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,509
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mr-Collateral531
    Newest Member
    Mr-Collateral531
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Your doctor may or may not be well-informed about the issue you raise so I would not agree that he/she would necessarily be the best person to rely on for a good answer. The question actually raises two issues.  The first issue has to do with cross contamination and individual sensitivity as dublin55 alluded to. Oats and wheat are both cereal grains that are typically grown in the same areas, transported in the same trucks, stored in the same silos and processed on the same equipment. So, there is usually significant CC (Cross Contamination). With gluten free oats, there is some effort to separate these processes that would otherwise cause significant CC and "gluten free" oats should meet the FDA requirement of not exceeding 20 ppm of gluten. But this 22 ppm standard is not strict enough for more sensitive celiacs. "Certified gluten free" oats (and other food products are held to a stricter standard, that being not exceeding 10 ppm. But even that is too much gluten for some super sensitive celiacs and will cause a reaction. The second issue with oats has nothing to do with gluten per se but with the protein found in oats called "avenin". Avenin has a structure similar enough to gluten to cause a reaction in some celiacs. This is called "cross reaction" not to be confused with "cross contamination" discussed in the previous paragraph. So, for whatever reason, whether cross contamination or cross reaction, it is estimated that about 10% of celiacs react to oats.
    • dublin555
      Karen, that sounds really tough. You must find both RA management and your new gut problems extremely irritating to handle at once. Together with your pain relief you still experience ongoing bloating complications that drag on without a resolution. Of course visiting a doctor to obtain a proper celiac diagnostic evaluation becomes necessary when no formal diagnosis has been received. Your journey toward recovery has been lengthy yet it brings comfort to notice your progress during this time. This support group offers you valuable help because there are people experiencing the same concerns with you. Working through your issues will be easier.
    • dublin555
      Yeah, it’s tricky. I’ve seen a lot of mixed opinions too. Some folks can tolerate certified gluten-free oats without a problem, but others with celiac still react. Honestly, it really depends on your sensitivity. Your doctor would be the best person to ask about your specific situation.
    • Matt13
      Hi guys! Can we eat them an can they cause villious atrophy? I saw multiple articles about it an they have very different opinions… so what did your doctor told you? Thanks!
    • robingfellow
      I can't edit my posts, but I forgot to note as well: I also had low iron and vitamin d according to my blood tests, despite already taking supplements for each
×
×
  • Create New...