Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What To Call Myself


Joanne11

Recommended Posts

Joanne11 Apprentice

Does anyone else feel weird calling themselves a celiac if they have not been officialy diagnosed by a doctor? I have a hard time trying to explain what I have to people, maybe it is because I don't really know for sure if I have celiac or just gluten intolerance, but sometimes it is easier to say I have celiac than to dive into the whole explanation of celiac vs gluten intolerance and why I don't know since I had possative blood work but negative biposy, and with the gi specialist I went to you don't have celiac if you have a negative biopsy. Just wondering if anyone feels the same way I do. Can anyone who has been officially diagnosed let me know how you feel? Do you think I am calling myself something I am not, should I just say I have gluten intolerance and not try to explain so much to people?

Sorry for all the questions, I guess I am feeling a little frustrated with the whole thing today


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor
Does anyone else feel weird calling themselves a celiac if they have not been officialy diagnosed by a doctor? I have a hard time trying to explain what I have to people, maybe it is because I don't really know for sure if I have celiac or just gluten intolerance, but sometimes it is easier to say I have celiac than to dive into the whole explanation of celiac vs gluten intolerance and why I don't know since I had possative blood work but negative biposy, and with the gi specialist I went to you don't have celiac if you have a negative biopsy. Just wondering if anyone feels the same way I do. Can anyone who has been officially diagnosed let me know how you feel? Do you think I am calling myself something I am not, should I just say I have gluten intolerance and not try to explain so much to people?

Sorry for all the questions, I guess I am feeling a little frustrated with the whole thing today

Joanne:

You do have Celiac and you can call your doctor an (*), or very uninformed.. Your positive bloodwork is enough to confirm Celiac. Bioipsy's can rule Celiac in, but can not rule it out, and it can determine the amount of damage.

It never fails to suprize me that lack of correct information that gets handed out as fact.

Welcome the the world of Celiac. Looking forward to hearing from you more. :)

surrender Newbie

I've been wanting to ask this same question. Our family's test results were antibody levels of (normal is under 10): Dad 290, Mom 17, Child #1 is 42, Child #2 is 26, Child #3 is 8. Because these were the stool tests through Enterolab, we don't have positive blood or biopsies. So what are we? And what about others with full blown celiac who get their antibodies down to normal...does that mean they are then gluten sensitive? This is such a confusing issue for me. In the end, we're on the diet for life. Should I just say we have celiac?

miles2go Contributor

Hi Joanne,

I went through that uncomfortable stage too, when I didn't know what to call myself, since I was only diagnosed with wheat and other allergies by skin and blood tests and couldn't be tested other than genetically because I'd been gluten-light for around eight years. For a while I contemplated doing Enterolab, but the diet had proven itself to me by that time, so I decided to save money instead. I have seen a number of wonderful doctors since that non-, inclusive-, perhaps conclusive dx and when I go to see medical health care professionals now, I tell them that I don't eat gluten. Most of them come back with a response that works the word 'celiac' into the conversation and so I let it be. When talking to friends and others, I can be a little more hedging about it, but if I don't want to go into it at length, I just use whatever I think will get me the least amount of questions. :D Labels are such silly things anyway... I like Deborah Madison's credo in her Vegetarian Cooking For Everyone cookbook, "The 1,400 recipes in this book are those that I like to cook. If you're a committed vegetarian, you can prepare every recipe in this book. If you are a vegan, you can cook most of them. If you don't attach a title to your eating style, you can cook everything in this book and serve it with meat, fish, or fowl." Like her, I don't attach a title to my eating style, but in my 'cookbook', there just happens to be no gluten.

Margaret

Nantzie Collaborator

I struggled with this for a long time because I didn't want to call myself something I'm not. I didn't want to offend anyone who really did have a positive biopsy.

But as I have spent more and more time on the board, I've seen how small the difference is between someone with biopsy-positive celiac and gluten intolerance as far as how they have to live their lives. There are over 200 symptoms of celiac, and I think the villi damage is just one of them, and the only one that they know how to measure. So it becomes the gold standard for diagnosis.

People with a positive biopsy I'm sure have an additional level of pain and issues with their intestines that I don't have to experience. But at the same time, my particular gluten intolerance gene predisposes me to neurological damage, which the people who are biopsy positive and have the DQ2 or DQ8 genes don't have to experience. When I get glutened, I get moderate GI issues, but I can also barely walk and my speech starts slurring.

It's really a case of six of one and half a dozen of the other. Either way you're in the same boat. I think at some point there will be something like different types of celiac (just like there are different types of diabetes).

That's the reason this board is so WONDERFUL. Nobody here is ever going to tell you that you don't have just as much right to be here as anyone else. In fact, several of the more active and longtime veteran members don't have a diagnosis.

I did a poll not too long ago asking about this, because I felt like I was seeing more non-diagnosis people than diagnosis people. Of the people who voted, 60% did not have an official diagnosis. Makes you feel a lot more at home. ;)

Now, I call myself celiac to family and friends (most of whom don't really get it). I also call myself celiac at restaurants. Here on the board, I avoid the word celiac, but I don't preface my advice or information by saying I'm only gluten intolerant. The only time I really make a specification is when we're discussing the difference between celiac and gluten intolerance, or if someone has negative tests and thinks that that means they shouldn't try the diet.

I also HATE the phrase gluten intolerant. It makes it sound like lactose intolerance - like all it's going to do is give me D for a couple hours. We need to think of a better phrase for it. If there was a better, more accurate phrase I'd use it. Because even though I've gotten more used to it over time, I'm not completely comfortable saying I'm celiac either.

Sometimes if someone who knows a little about celiac asks I tell them I have a "genetic variant of celiac disease". It makes it sound official and mysterious. :P

In restaurants, all they need to know is how to cook my food. The additional information just confuses things. Sometimes it's the first time they've ever heard of it, so the more to the point you are, the better luck you're going to have.

Hope that helps.

Nancy

Lisa Mentor

Would positive blood work not indicate Celiac for Joanne? Can someone support my thoughts, regardless as to what she was told by her GI, being that her biopsy was not confirmed and therefore she does not have Celiac.

I do have a positive diagnosis through endoscopy and biopsy and I have no issue what so ever, if those that are not diagnosed call themselves Celiac. I do have an issue, if someone called themselves Celiac for simply diet control for weight loss as indicated in a recent article that was discussed here.

Whatever, however anyone needs to get the food that they need in order to keep themselves healthy, free of symptoms and pain, or to explain a complicated issue in simple terms, I see no issue.

I feel we are just one big family with similar concerns.

Nantzie Collaborator

Oh absolutely Lisa! With a positive blood test she should have been diagnosed as celiac in the first place (a well-informed doctor would have done that). I've seen a lot of people here who have an official diagnosis based on blood alone.

So, yes. I believe that Joanne has actually full-fledged celiac. Not gluten intolerance.

Nancy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



miles2go Contributor
Would positive blood work not indicate Celiac for Joanne? Can someone support my thoughts, regardless as to what she was told by her GI, being that her biopsy was not confirmed and therefore she does not have Celiac.

I do have a positive diagnosis through endoscopy and biopsy and I have no issue what so ever, if those that are not diagnosed call themselves Celiac. I do have an issue, if someone called themselves Celiac for simply diet control for weight loss as indicated in a recent article that was discussed here.

Whatever, however anyone needs to get the food that they need in order to keep themselves healthy, free of symptoms and pain, or to explain a complicated issue in simple terms, I see no issue.

I feel we are just one big family with similar concerns.

I appreciate your asking this, as I've kind of wondered after reading the board for a while what actually constitutes a celiac (and this may be tangential to what you're asking, Lisa). Is a celiac someone who was born that way, or someone who has had some kind of trauma and then had symptoms? Or is it some kind of standard that (perhaps not everyone) can agree on?

I know I'm fine with where I am concerning a diagnosis, but that may not work for all.

miles2go Contributor
Oh absolutely Lisa! With a positive blood test she should have been diagnosed as celiac in the first place (a well-informed doctor would have done that). I've seen a lot of people here who have an official diagnosis based on blood alone.

So, yes. I believe that Joanne has actually full-fledged celiac. Not gluten intolerance.

Nancy

I am wondering what Joanne's blood test was? I've been off-line for a few days, so may have missed it.

And....what is the actual difference between gluten intolerance and celiac? Shades of JerryK. ;)

Nancym Enthusiast

How about Gluteniac? Cross between Gluten Sensitive, Celiac and Maniac? :)

Lisa Mentor
Oh absolutely Lisa! With a positive blood test she should have been diagnosed as celiac in the first place (a well-informed doctor would have done that). I've seen a lot of people here who have an official diagnosis based on blood alone.

So, yes. I believe that Joanne has actually full-fledged celiac. Not gluten intolerance.

Nancy

Yes, I agree. Joanne welcome to the club. You have Celiac Disease. :) And that's a good thing.

Lisa Mentor
How about Gluteniac? Cross between Gluten Sensitive, Celiac and Maniac? :)

:lol::lol::lol: Perfect!!!

miles2go Contributor
:lol::lol::lol: Perfect!!!

Hey, hey, that's gluteniah, if you's a maineah. ;)

Tim-n-VA Contributor

Interestingly, I am biopsy diagnosed but I don't describe myself as a "Celiac". I have celiac disease. I don't know why I make that distinction when I have no hesitation to say I am a diabetic.

Lisa Mentor
Interestingly, I am biopsy diagnosed but I don't describe myself as a "Celiac". I have celiac disease. I don't know why I make that distinction when I have no hesitation to say I am a diabetic.

I too, refer to myself as a person with Celiac Disease, rather a "Celiac" because that sounds odd to me. I also refer to myself a being raised in the Catholic faith but I am not a "Catholic". Neither one defines me as the person that I am, rather a culmination of many things.

Joanne11 Apprentice
I am wondering what Joanne's blood test was? I've been off-line for a few days, so may have missed it.

And....what is the actual difference between gluten intolerance and celiac? Shades of JerryK. ;)

Hello, thanks for all your replies.

My blood test was antigliadan IgG and IgA possative on a scale where <10 was normal mine were in the 40's. I am under the impresion that tTG-IgA is a better indicator for celiac but also that it is directly linked to intestional damage, if your intestines are showing damage then your tTG levels are elevated, I think mine was a 3 or a 4 <5 is normal on my lab's scale. I did not have a total serum IgA done though so I don't know if the tTG was a false negative or not.

JNBunnie1 Community Regular

See, I had no positive tests at all. They did an intestinal biopsy, it was 'negative' (I'd only been actively sick for six months, so duh) and they didn't do any of the blood tests. I actually learned about Celiac disease by reading Dr. Jordan Rubin's book the Maker's Diet. Which had a lot of unrelated stuff, but it had a little about celiac, so I tried it and I got better. It actually took almost a year for me to return to my standard mental capacity, and since then I've acttually gotten smarter than I was before. Has that happened to anyone else?

corinne Apprentice

I have collagenous colitis which can be treated by a gluten-free diet. It's too hard to explain to most people so I usually just say that eating some foods makes me sick, to someone who's interested I'll explain that I can't eat gluten and if they're interested I'll explain some more what this type of colitis is (no it's not Crohn's ...). Probably same thing for someone with celiac disease. Different explanations for different people. Occasionally I get asked by those with celiac disease why I'm on the diet and most accept that there are other diseases caused by gluten. So I guess I don't call myself anything.

mamabear Explorer

The official medical line of celiac disease is the gold standard biopsy proven intestinal damage of lymphocytic infiltration and villous blunting. There are some researchers who have recently published that a positive tTG plus anemia,weight loss or diarrhea is celiac disease .....with or without a biopsy. I have searched the PubMed sites trying to find this reference again( I found it in a medical journal last week, and now I can't put my hands on it)...I'll keep looking until I find it. Also a recent study by some Irish researchers who define gluten sensitivity as positive AGA's and celiac disease as positive tTG or EMA antibodies. At any rate, I think it shows an evolution of the understanding of this disease complex. It is not so cut and dried IMO......

I agree with Momma Goose that it doesn't really matter how you perceive your condition... as long as your docs take you seriously! and check for and monitor for complications and co-existing medical conditions.

sfm Apprentice
Does anyone else feel weird calling themselves a celiac if they have not been officialy diagnosed by a doctor? I have a hard time trying to explain what I have to people, maybe it is because I don't really know for sure if I have celiac or just gluten intolerance, but sometimes it is easier to say I have celiac than to dive into the whole explanation of celiac vs gluten intolerance and why I don't know since I had possative blood work but negative biposy, and with the gi specialist I went to you don't have celiac if you have a negative biopsy. Just wondering if anyone feels the same way I do. Can anyone who has been officially diagnosed let me know how you feel? Do you think I am calling myself something I am not, should I just say I have gluten intolerance and not try to explain so much to people?

Sorry for all the questions, I guess I am feeling a little frustrated with the whole thing today

I say I am gluten intolerant. I know it's pretty much the same as celiac, but people either seem to understand, or I just give them a basic explanation (I get very sick from eating anything with wheat, barley, rye or oats), and they seem to get it. If you had positive bloodwork for celiac, then the biopsy could have just missed the damage, no? So just because your diagnosis isn't 'official', doesn't mean you are not a celiac. My own blood work was inconclusive, but I didn't have the tests done until I was gluten free for several months.

A lot of people don't know what celiac disease means, anyway, so to me it really doesn't matter much.

Sheryll

sfm Apprentice
How about Gluteniac? Cross between Gluten Sensitive, Celiac and Maniac? :)

Good one! :P

Helena Contributor

Joanne, I agree---positive blood tests . .. or even simply a positive dietary response to the gluten-free diet are enough to claim the 'celiac' label.

As for me--I never did go through with the biopsy, but I had a positive tTG test when on a nearly gluten-free diet and a more positive tTG + positive antigliadin test after a gluten challenge. My doctor says that it is very likely that I am celiac and that I should assume that I am especially since I react to gluten!

Joanne11 Apprentice

That what I am thinking too, I felt sooo much better after just a few days of gluten free. It has been over a month now and my family even notices a difference in me over the phone. The combination of some posative blood work and a posative dietary response is enough to convince me that I have celiac, but I just wanted to get some different opintions . In the long run I know it does not matter gluten intolerant or celiac as long as I feel better on the diet. I feel that if I had continued to eat gluten and was biposied 5 years from now there would probably be intestional damage because my symptoms were not going away. So I guess that it is better to catch it now than continue to feel ill and do more damage as the years went on, even if thet means not having a concrete diagnisis from my doctor. At least I know I am not alone in being frustrated in not haveing a specific diagnosis from any of the multiple doctors I have seen!

Lisa Mentor

Smart Girl ;)

Glad to have you amounst us!

SUZ42 Explorer

When I took my results from EnteroLab to my doctor, he said "well, I'll put it down as Celiac Sprue". And placed copies of the results in my chart. So, he took the positive results from the stool, along with the positive Celiac gene as evidence of the disease. Without doing bloodwork/biopsy, as I had been Gluten free for a few weeks by this time.

I wish all the MDs would get on the same page!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,817
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Charisse25
    Newest Member
    Charisse25
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Iris Kraft
      I do not use menthol lozenge, but I have found a brand of oral probiotics that has same ingredients as Prodentim but without spending $50  bottle. I bought Naturewise Oral probiotics from Amazon at $29 a bottle for 50 chewables instead of the 30 qty. The Simbicort upset the bacteria is my mouth, had white tongue and created a dental problem with a tooth, plus the inflammation in throat, vocal cords. Used the chewable and rested it along the gum where tooth hurts 4 x on Monday. Tuesday, went to dentist and she looked at what I thought was my problem tooth and she said all looked pink and happy. No problem.  Also, I spoke with my Allergist and he said instead of two puffs am and pm, try one puff only in am.Can always add one puff in PM if needed. Rinse mouth twice and gargle twice, and brush tongue. Use the Rescue inhaler Albuterol if needed (which I didn't need to). Know that Flucasolone, Simbicort, Advair are interchangeable.
    • Ann13
      I have the exact same symptoms for a couple of wks now but I've been taking Symbicort for quite awhile at this point. I read you can get yeast infection in the vocal cords so I may ask my Dr. for antifungal meds cos I cant wait for an ENT exam. Also read on this site the connection between Vit D and K2 deficiency and asthma...doesn't apply to me cos mine is from mold in a house years ago but still might try and see if my asthma improves. I am Celiac and gluten causes the same symptoms but it says this inhaler is gluten free and it only started acting up so that option is out. I use Ventolin on occasion but using that for many many years. For me I will see if can switch inhalers to a brand that doesn't affect vocal cords as much, Advair is NOT one of them, plus will try the supplements. Do not suck on menthol lozenges cos menthol dries out cords more...sleeping elevated and sucking on ice chips gets the swelling down...at night this can really help especially. I can't continue like this so will get on everything this coming week.  
    • Rhenriksen
      Did a little more research just now and found out that even though the max methane should not exceed 10. It is normal to be around 3 and not rise. Again, I was at 13 so this does make me a bit suspicious. This was done back in May of 2024. I do recall being put on 14 day Antibiotic called Rifaximin but I'm really not sure if it made a difference, but if it did, then the problems still came back:( 
    • Rhenriksen
      I did a SIBO Test about a year ago, and I barely elevated on the Methane portion (max was 10 and I hit 13). Dr wasn't too concerned.    
    • trents
      Have you looked into SIBO (Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth)?  Also, MCAS (Mast Cell Activation Syndrome)/histamine intolerance (they go together like a hand and glove).  Both of the above are common in the celiac community.
×
×
  • Create New...