Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

When Your Boss Doesn't Get It


DestinyLeah

Recommended Posts

DestinyLeah Apprentice

I work in a bakery. My boss has every contact number imaginable, all my medical info for an emergency, and requires me to wear a medical ID tag and a face mask every day, as well as wash my hands and change before eating or leaving the store.

Today I accidentally got gluten poisoning from "corn tortillas" that were actually mostly wheat flour. The mistake was noticed too late by the restaurant where I ate, and I am now bloated, covered in an itchy rash, and unable to eat. I told my boss I would be out tomorrow, and he said that if I do not go to the hospital and get a note saying I was in such a condition that I needed their supervision and care, I would be fired because tomorrow there is a huge group coming into the store, and it will be a busy day.

I called my doctor as soon as I realized what had happened, and she said that unless I got uncontrollable symptoms or stayed lethargic/nauseated/rashy for more than two days, I should be fine, and to take tomorrow off and take it easy.

Is my boss really allowed to fire me for a reaction to gluten based on the inconvenient timing?!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Generic Apprentice

Look into the americans with disabilities act, it may have some info that could help you.

Open Original Shared Link

gfp Enthusiast
Is my boss really allowed to fire me for a reaction to gluten based on the inconvenient timing?!

Yes and No.... unless you have a contract say's otherwise your boss can fire you anytime and doesn't need a reason.

If he chooses to give a reason as your having celiac disease then you can contest that...since then it is due to a disability.

The fact he is giving you warning would seem to indicate he doesn't want to fire you..

Please try and read this all through :D I am giving his perspective first....

How you choose to act is up to you.... but it could be he is just trying to keep a business afloat that pay's you and him and others salary.

My ex-'s sister had a perhaps analogous situation... when she got pregnant she used the UK system to the full and got 6 months paid time off paid for by her employer who also had to hire a temp to fill-in ...

She worked for a small company ... after the 6 months she managed to extend it and then got pregnant again and took another 6 months...

She has every legal right to keep doing this... however she doesn't have a job to go back top because the company went broke.

So now she and everyone else who workled there doesn't have a job... the expense of paying for two people to do the one job certainly didn't help the company survive..(They only had 6 employees anyway)

Rather sadly she didn't need the job at all. She only made 1/10th or less of her husbands salary and the money really made very little difference to them, some of her coworkers however... did need the job.

She is however very bitter she doesn't have her job anymore... which to me is illogical since she is partly responsible perhaps largely repsonsible for the business going broke in the 1st place.

When she chose her course of action which was to exploit every piece of legislation, take her husband's advice (who qualifed as a lawyer but works as an exec.) on how to screw evert last penny from the company she set sometihng in place.

Legally she was to the letter, it didn't stop the business going broke though. Its surprising how narrow the margins are for running this kind of business.

I frequently hear this for my girlfriend who does bar work... she tots up the till and then say's he's making a fortune... he can afford to pay us more... except of course the bar has to pay salaries, taxes and 101 other costs ...

You might consider that this is at least partly the concern of the bakery owner. At the end of the day if he doesn't make enough money you just loose your job, he looses a business...

You have really made an effort .. you telephoned and gave warning... giving him the chance to get someone else...

If you want to keep working there though I think bringing up the disabilities act is just inflamatory...

You can bring it up and then he will be sure your the type of employee he doesn't need working for him. So from that time he can just look for things he can use to justify firing you not related to it..?

I'd try and broach it very gently.... point out you just suffered an accident... that you then made every effort to let him know ASAP. Would he have insisted on a medical note if you just told him you had very bad "womens problems" this month?

Perhaps say that him insisting on a medical note is not condicive to your working relationship.... anymore than you bringing up the Americans with disabilities act.

I'm presuming this is a "small" bakery... if you were working for a big company then its different because the people you are dealing with are HR, not necassarily your boss... when its a smal company and the boss is HR/management/Accounting all in one he's likely to do a less than professional job at all of them.... so throwing the act in his face could just blow up???

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

You need to:

1) Go back to the restaurant ASAP and get a letter from them, signed by the manager, explaining that you had requested gluten-free food, and that they screwed up. Explain to the manager (nicely, not accusingly or shrilly) that you stand to lose your job because of the effects of the food that they served you.

2) Go to your doctor's office ASAPand get a note from her saying that you called in and that she advised you to take tomorrow off. Many workplaces require a note from the doctor if you have an ongoing condition that results in missed workdays.

Your boss IS allowed to fire you for calling in sick when you are functional. You sound very uncomfortable, but not bedridden or attached to the toilet, and you do not have a viral or bacterial infection, so technically, you are not sick.

Working in a bakery might be constantly glutening you from inhaling flour dust, even with the mask. :(

Going out to eat is probably not a good idea if you are this sensitive. :(

Good luck.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Would he have insisted on a medical note if you just told him you had very bad "womens problems" this month?

Actually, here in the States, "women's problems" are used as an excuse to not hire women. No woman I know would dare complain of the time of the month as an excuse to call in sick. We might as well say that for 1/6 of our worktime, we won't be able show up. Nobody would hire someone who said that.

miles2go Contributor

How's by you from a former New Orleanian,

I would definitely recommend getting in touch with your local worker's compensation board. It sounds like you have an allergy to wheat along with celiac and since I've been in a position just like yours where I was working in a place that made me sick, it's kind of a nightmare reading your story. My former bosses were also uncompromising and after five years of being horribly sick all the time, I finally made some headway and got relocated to another job. I work for a university, so it was a matter of dealing with HR and EOE that got me to where I am today. There's a threshold that atopic individuals can stand and when it goes beyond that, that's when all heck breaks loose. I am thinking that possibly you are so compromised by working in that gluteny bakery all the time that just one iota of it outside of the workplace is putting you into a danger zone. It's easy to say and I know from experience very difficult to do, but you need to find another job! As for tomorrow, I would suggest doing your best to show up and let them see how miserable you are. Maybe you can work through the busy period and go home after that. Or better yet, get a note from your doctor, but I wouldn't just meekly resign if you can stand it, I'd tough it out as long as possible or best of all possible worlds, go to the competition and get a job that doesn't involve lots of gluteny substance! We aren't allowed in the military and we fall into this gray area of being disabled, but not really and for employers to use that to our disadvantage is frankly unfair. Hope you feel better soon and keep us posted!Best,

Margaret

miles2go Contributor

P.S. Apologies for the acronymage: HR = Human Resources, of course and EOE = Equal Opportunity Employment, which I see in my university directory has been changed to Equal Opportunity & Diversity, if that helps any...

M.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jo.R Contributor

It may also be a legal thing. He must require a Dr. note from every employee when sick, or he can't really ask for one from any employee. That can lead to a lawsuit if he said OK to you, but later required one from another employee because he suspected faking. Sadly those of us who try and do right pay for those who are always looking for a way to beat the system.

  • 9 years later...
jeanzdyn Apprentice

I had a run in with HR at work today.  The HR woman's son has gluten "sensitivity" or allergy or something, but NOT celiac disease.  She tried to tell me that I am being unreasonable!  I said that I cannot eat in restaurants because of cross contamination.  I walked out on her.

I sent her an email and explained that she really does not understand what I am talking about.  I am extremely distressed by this turn of events.   I have been having a lot of issues and I believe that my Celiac disease has gotten much worse in just the last month.  I am forced to travel for work and it's killing me --the stress, the restuarants, the poor nutrition because we change hotels daily and I cannot bring perishable food items with me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,083
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    janmary
    Newest Member
    janmary
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Kathleen JJ
      @cristiana Do you have any suggestions for the gummy bear type of candy? Because that is what is getting passed around. Someone told me "you will have to read all labels thoroughly from now on" but to be honest: I don't know what I'm looking for that should or should not be there? And is the notion "gluten free" trustable? And what about "may contain residual gluten"? Is that safe?
    • Kathleen JJ
      @trents The first thought indeed I had was 'thank god it's not cancer' and of course, there are many, many, many worse diagnoses to get. But this doesn't mean it doesn't come as a shock. I read a lot of the time 'the most common symptoms are...' and then all the things he doesn't have, but never do I find a list of less common symptoms (bar @Wheatwackeds examples - and also non of these are present). I get that severe pains can be a symptom, though the fact that they were omnipresent for 10 days (the exact time his viral values were up) and then 6 weeks later 1 episode also when the family was going through a stomach bug, and since then (nor ever before) none, this logically seems more related to a virus then a symptom of Coeliac, as I'd think this would have to be more present on a regular basis? He always has loved gluten-containing food and at that time was rather having less of it (due to the bug and feeling a little under the weather so eating more yoghurt and the likes then cookies) then more of it. It just doesn't sound all that logical. That being said, I comprehend AND accept that things can not always be logical.   I am trying to understand what you are saying about the tolerance - so as long as he eats gluten, he will have some tolerance to it, but when he stops, and say accidentally ingests something, he will react more as the tolerance is lower? It sounds so illogical (hmm, I see a pattern with myself: really looking for logic in a very illogical condition). And how do you interpret the values very 6 months as you maybe don't know there has been an accidental intake?  Do the values ever go down to zero or is it a question of getting them mainly lower and can they never go down to normal rates?   Normally results of his biopsy are coming in on monday, a little chance they come in today. I've been checking my mail every 10 seconds 🤦🏻‍♀️, this will not be a productive working day I fear 🙄. Then we know the values, but we only have an appointment with the specialized pediatrician and dietitian on December 6d (which in Belgium is a children's holiday comparable to Santa Clause). So we'll get the full "introduction" to the disorder and approach then.   I did talk to the pediatrician and gastrointestinal doctor who did the gastroscopy asking their advice about a plan I was having: to wait to start the diet after the holiday season, we will be abroad in a hotel and to start there in this very new world feels quite stressful for us, but even worse: it will start this journey in a lot of negativity. So our plan is to have a "yummy" party after we return from our trip, during Christmas holidays, inviting some of his friends and buying and making a vast array of gluten free goodies and having them sample and score it. This way it feels like a festive thing AND we can immediately find some things (hopefully) he genuinely like.   Both doctors agreed with this approach as this was truly an accidental find and hadn't we tested his blood 2 weeks ago chances were we'd only have found out in a year or 2 so those extra few weeks will not make the difference.   So now I'm gathering information, talking to people to know where there's good stuff...     But what keeps on being quite ununderstandable to me (I hope this will get explained on December 6th) is how it works. So it's auto-immune, meaning gluten trigger an immune response. Is this a black and white thing? Does 1 grain of wheat trigger the same response as a full bowl of spaghetti? And I mean this on a bowel and organs level, not on a symptoms level, as I gather (is this correct?) that not having any symptoms does not mean that his bowel doesn't get attacked?   I know it all could be worse, I truly do, but to be honest, this is the 4th "anvil falling on my head out of a clear blue sky" diagnosis that I got for one of my most loved people. First my mother was diagnosed with presenile dementia without anyone in the family having it. Then my unborn daughter turned out to have a chromosomal defect that made that she could only live inside of me and died when she was born, then my sister turned out to have (a tested non genetic 🤯) form of presenile dementia as well, with me being her only caretaker as my mother passed away a few years ago and she has no family of her own. And now this. And this is absolutely not only the least of this row but of course not even in the same ball park. But for my resilience and bearing capacity this just feels not little as it affects the life of my little boy...    
    • Wheatwacked
      Could be the Ozampic is masking your expected symptoms.  Like an analgesic masks pain.  Qzampic slows digestion to lower the rate glucose enters the intestine to slow its effect on glucose level.  It seems it might also slow down the gluten entry into the intestine, reducing its trigger level for the antibodies.  Ultimately the damage from gluten is the same, just not as fast so the pain is less.  Sourdough bread has less gluten.  Ozampic siows its entry.
    • Wheatwacked
      You can sell it better if the whole family does gluten free.  If he does have Celiac Diease, it is genetic so either you, your spouse, or both have a 40% chance of also having Celiac.  There are over 200 non classic symptoms also caused by celiac disease not often considered by doctors. Joint pain, muscle pain, muscle cramps, osteoporosis, and allergies for starters.  
    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @MHavoc, thank you for your question and welcome to the clinic. First, has the contstipation abated with the GFD? If your are pursuing further diagnostics you must continue to eat gluten. Each lab has their own reference range for their test, but they indicate an H for high.  Typically anything above 11 is considered positive. Mild chronic inflammation (gastritis) can interfere with intrinsic factor for B12 leading to low B12 causing low MCHC (anemia). So what is causing your gastritis?  A high tTG IgA level generally indicates potential gastrointestinal problems most commonly associated with celiac disease.  Although the biopsy is the Gold Standard for diagnosis, not finding damage in the biopsy does not rule out Celiac Disease. It means they did not find damage where they looked.  The small intestine is over 20 feet long. Many here have been blood positive and biopsy negative, it just delays the diagnosis until you have enough damage to find and fit their diagnostic profile. The Ttg-iga is not only sensitive (90%) but highly specific (98%) and won’t show positive until the damage is severe.  It is estimated that 40% of first degree relatives of diagnosed Celiacs have undiagnosed Celiac Disease, so your sister is a big risk factor in whether you have it. Are You Confused About Your Celiac Disease Lab Results?  This article explains it better and is quite readable. Celiac Disease can cause deficient vitamin D.  Low vitamin D compromises the immune system.  Any other symptoms? liver enzymes?  Recent cold or flue? Celiac Disease and the malabsorption it causes through vitamin and mineral deficiencies can elicit symptoms not usually associated with Celiac Disease. Case in point maybe your gastritis and anemia.  
×
×
  • Create New...