Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

No Biopsy Diagnosis By Dr.


maryjoali

Recommended Posts

maryjoali Newbie

I attended a Celiac Education Day and heard that in order to be truly diagnosed as a Celiac you must have a positive biopsy. My doctor put me on a gluten free diet and then referred me to an allergist specialist doctor. He did blood work (positive) and the skin allergy test thing (reaction to wheat, rye, oats, melons, nuts & peanuts, casein). He referred me to a dietician for Celiac diet. Both my family doctor and the specialist told me that there was no reason to go for the biopsy since I am "too young" (28!)...I had one when I was 15 for a hiatus hernia, so I have no idea how age is now playing a factor! Anyway, I have been gluten-free since January now and from what I've learned here and from the workshops today, the healing has likely begun and the biopsy would be negative anyway.

I just feel so frustrated since both doctors (MacMaster Hospital) and the dietician (Shelley Case) all reinforced how important it is to have the biopsy to be properly diagnosed. Why would neither doctor refer me??? I know it's likely due to misinformation, but the specialist truly seemed to know so much about Celiac.

To me, there is absolutely NO way that I will even take a morsel of gluten, let alone enough to being back the intestinal distress!

Just needed to vent.....although I did learn a lot today!! :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

"I just feel so frustrated since both doctors (MacMaster Hospital) and the dietician (Shelley Case) all reinforced how important it is to have the biopsy to be properly diagnosed. Why would neither doctor refer me???"

Because you did not need one. You should be thankful to these doctors. The 'Gold Standard' is now more of the 'Old Standard', there are also times when the biopsies will be a false negative either because not enough damage is done or the did not biopsy the right spot and you can be left to go on a very long and painful journey until you are sick enough sot he damage is enough so they say 'yea it is definately celiac, all the villi are gone. Too bad this at times doesn't happen till an autopsy.

The true key for symptomatic celiacs is the response to the diet. If your blood work was positive and you have responded to the diet when followed strictly that really is all the diagnostics you need.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

"I just feel so frustrated since both doctors (MacMaster Hospital) and the dietician (Shelley Case) all reinforced how important it is to have the biopsy to be properly diagnosed. Why would neither doctor refer me???"

For some reason I manage to double post this when I added a bit on the edit. Sorry about that, It is early and I have not had that first cup of coffee.

Because you did not need one. In addition with the positive skin allergic reactions you should not be doing a gluten challenge, something you would have to do for a biopsy. You could have a life threating allergic reaction especially if you have been on the diet. You should be thankful to these doctors.

In addition the 'Gold Standard' is now more of the 'Old Standard', there are also times when the biopsies will be a false negative either because not enough damage is done or the did not biopsy the right spot and you can be left to go on a very long and painful journey until you are sick enough sot he damage is enough so they say 'yea it is definately celiac, all the villi are gone. Too bad this at times doesn't happen till an autopsy.

The true key for symptomatic celiacs is the response to the diet. If your blood work was positive and you have responded to the diet when followed strictly that really is all the diagnostics you need.

maryjoali Newbie
Because you did not need one. In addition with the positive skin allergic reactions you should not be doing a gluten challenge, something you would have to do for a biopsy. You could have a life threating allergic reaction especially if you have been on the diet. You should be thankful to these doctors.

Thanks so much for your reply! That makes me feel a lot better. :)

Do you know much about positive skin reactions? My naturopath said it's unusual for a Celiac patient to react with the skin scratch test unless the allergy is pretty severe? That seems to be what you're saying too...I haven't been able to find much research about that. Any other info. you have would be appreciated.

Thanks again! :)

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Thanks so much for your reply! That makes me feel a lot better. :)

Do you know much about positive skin reactions? My naturopath said it's unusual for a Celiac patient to react with the skin scratch test unless the allergy is pretty severe? That seems to be what you're saying too...I haven't been able to find much research about that. Any other info. you have would be appreciated.

Thanks again! :)

I think your naturopath is right on that one. Celiac or Gluten intolerance is just that an intolerance, it doesn't have a histimine type reaction for most of us. I did not skin test postive for gluten as an allergan but I still have DH, a skin autoimmune reaction instead of a histimine one. The histamine reaction can be fatal short term, the autoimmune reation takes longer, or just makes you wish you were dead. :(

You might want to post a query or even a poll as to how many of us are allergic and intolerant. The results might be interesting.

One other thing to note, when I was diagnosed by an allergist the skin testing showed me reacting to everything they tested for that was not food related, except beech trees. At that time I had asthma and was on Singulair and inhalors. Post gluten-free 5 years and I have very few allegies any more and have not used my inhalor or taken singulair in over 4 years. My allergist said that my immune system was in hyperdrive trying to protect me from the gluten reaction. Without the gluten that stopped.

maryjoali Newbie
I think your naturopath is right on that one. Celiac or Gluten intolerance is just that an intolerance, it doesn't have a histimine type reaction for most of us. I did not skin test postive for gluten as an allergan but I still have DH, a skin autoimmune reaction instead of a histimine one. The histamine reaction can be fatal short term, the autoimmune reation takes longer, or just makes you wish you were dead. :(

You might want to post a query or even a poll as to how many of us are allergic and intolerant. The results might be interesting.

One other thing to note, when I was diagnosed by an allergist the skin testing showed me reacting to everything they tested for that was not food related, except beech trees. At that time I had asthma and was on Singulair and inhalors. Post gluten-free 5 years and I have very few allegies any more and have not used my inhalor or taken singulair in over 4 years. My allergist said that my immune system was in hyperdrive trying to protect me from the gluten reaction. Without the gluten that stopped.

It'll be interesting to see what turns up in terms of environmental allergens when I go for the second round. I've only had the food ones so far. I am still so shocked how one allergy can send the body into a complete frenzy!!

I am going to do some more research about the allergic vs. intolerant....

On a separate note, I just bought a Bette Hagman book from someone with the same username as you in ebay. Was it you perhaps?? Small world if it is!! :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,082
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Debbie MD
    Newest Member
    Debbie MD
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      69.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your approach is spot-on—trusting reliable sources like Mayo Clinic and sticking to a gluten-free diet that works for you is the best way to navigate all the noise out there. The claim that rice and corn contain forms of gluten harmful to celiacs is indeed a misconception. While these grains do contain proteins that may technically be referred to as "glutens" in a broader scientific sense, they are structurally and functionally different from the gliadin found in wheat, which is the specific protein harmful to those with celiac disease. Scientific research overwhelmingly supports the safety of non-contaminated rice and corn for celiacs unless there’s a separate sensitivity or allergy involved. Some opinion pieces or alternative health sources may blur the lines by conflating these proteins, which can cause unnecessary worry. You're absolutely correct to focus on the distinction between scientifically validated information and anecdotal claims. It's also important to note that some people with celiac disease may develop sensitivities to other grains over time, but this is individual and not a universal rule. If you’re asymptomatic and thriving on a diet that includes certified gluten-free products with rice and corn, there’s no reason to change what’s clearly working for you. The internet is a breeding ground for well-meaning but misguided advice, and it’s easy to feel overwhelmed. Your instinct to validate claims through reliable research is exactly the right way to go. Keep enjoying your gluten-free meals, stick with trusted certifications, and don’t feel pressured to adopt restrictive diets that aren’t backed by science or tailored to your specific needs. Happy New Year to you too!
    • Scott Adams
      Healing and regaining energy after a celiac diagnosis can be a frustratingly slow process, but you're not alone in feeling this way! Everyone's healing journey is different, and factors like age, how long celiac was undiagnosed, and the extent of intestinal damage can all play a role. In general, villi can begin to heal within a few weeks to months after starting a strict gluten-free diet, but for some adults—especially those diagnosed later in life—it can take a year or more to see significant improvement. Studies suggest that older adults may heal more slowly, but it does happen with consistent gluten avoidance. Since you're already taking iron, vitamin D3, and a multivitamin, you're on the right track. Here are a few additional tips that might help: Be Patient with Your Body: It’s hard to wait, but healing takes time. Track your progress in small ways—maybe energy levels on a scale of 1-10 each week—to notice gradual improvements. Check for Other Deficiencies: Sometimes celiacs have trouble absorbing other nutrients, like B12, magnesium, or zinc, which can also affect energy levels. Your doctor may want to test for these. Consider Other Conditions: Fatigue can be linked to other issues like thyroid problems, adrenal fatigue, or even sleep disturbances, which can sometimes occur alongside celiac disease. It might be worth discussing this with your healthcare provider. Stay Active, but Pace Yourself: Gentle exercise, like walking or yoga, can help improve energy levels, but don’t push yourself too hard—listen to your body. Hydration and Balanced Meals: Make sure you're drinking enough water and eating a balanced gluten-free diet with plenty of whole foods. Sometimes highly processed gluten-free products can leave you feeling sluggish. Remember, healing isn’t just physical—it’s also mental. You’ve made a huge, positive change by going gluten-free, and your body is working hard to repair itself. It’s okay to feel impatient, but know that you're moving in the right direction. Hang in there—you’ll get there!
    • Lotte18
      Hi Scott, I thought I'd be like "most people" and could go back to having dairy once my villi had healed.  But after dealing with neurological problems that cropped up long after my gut had healed it turned out that this just wasn't true.  I have no idea if celiac influences pancreatic enzyme production or if it's the other way around--for some of us-- but there is a very real relationship that isn't being discussed with patients.  The article just reiterates information that can mislead you if your real problem is pancreatic not villi related.  
    • Scott Adams
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Amyinwyoming! Answers to your question that you might receive may not be helpful to you as an individual since sensitivity levels vary significantly within the gluten sensitive/gluten intolerant/celiac community. The other complicating factor is that low levels of gluten in a product may not cause obvious symptoms but may still generate low level inflammation in the small bowel. When in doubt, it is best to pass on the product. I'm not a particularly sensitive celiac so I might allow myself to eat something at a guest's house that was made from a food product with the kind of disclaimer label you describe but I typically shy away from buying them or consuming them when I have a choice.
×
×
  • Create New...