Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Casein Vs. Lactose?


GeoffCJ

Recommended Posts

GeoffCJ Enthusiast

"So, if he can eat cheese without any reaction, he is most likely lactose intolerant. But, if he has a reaction to cheese than he may be casein intolerant."

What's the easiest way to tell reliably which I'm reacting too?

Thanks,

Geoff


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

The easiest way would be to avoid dairy for a time, then drink milk and take a lactaid. If it still bothers you, it was the casein.

SunnyDyRain Enthusiast

I've heard that it sometimes takes a large dose of lactaid to help lactose intolerant people.

Is there blood work or something they can test for?

How come dairy is just starting to bother me now, 3 weeks after going gluten free?

missy'smom Collaborator

Been wondering about this for the longest time. So, for those who are casein intolerant, what happens if you drink Lactaid milk?

dlp252 Apprentice
Been wondering about this for the longest time. So, for those who are casein intolerant, what happens if you drink Lactaid milk?

Terrible sinus congestion leading to sinus infection develops over a few days to a week. :(

Sometimes gas, bloating, diarrhea or any one or a combination of those, happens within a few hours of ingesting.

CarlaB Enthusiast
Been wondering about this for the longest time. So, for those who are casein intolerant, what happens if you drink Lactaid milk?

It makes no difference that it has lactaid since it's the casein that bothers them.

Sunny, the dairy may have been bothering you all along but you only started noticing it as you started feeling a bit better. That would be my guess.

Enterolab tests for casein sensitivity. I tested positive, went off casein for six months and noticed no difference at all. I added it back and had no problems. I don't think any test is accurate all the time.

missy'smom Collaborator

My problem must be lactose then because in the past there was a big difference in my reaction to Lactaid vs. regular milk. On a day when my system is running smoothly, I should try a test again and drink a glass of Lactaid milk and see how I feel, now that I'm gluten-free (never drink it straight up). My mother was told when I was an infant that I had a milk allergy so she just didn't give it to me in a glass :huh: I got it in every other form!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SunnyDyRain Enthusiast
Sunny, the dairy may have been bothering you all along but you only started noticing it as you started feeling a bit better. That would be my guess.

I could see that if I didn't have 2 weeks of good BM's , and feeling good before the dairy started to effect me.

To me it seems once my body got used to not eat gluten, it said "OH CRAP, she's feeling good....now how are we going to screw with her?!"

ArtGirl Enthusiast
Enterolab tests for casein sensitivity. I tested positive, went off casein for six months and noticed no difference at all. I added it back and had no problems. I don't think any test is accurate all the time.

It may have been a false positive, but this I think is very rare. I tested positive to Casein through Enterolab, but also through other labs as well. They were dead-on.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.