Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Anyone Got Sick From Canola Oil?


Yenni

Recommended Posts

trents Grand Master
(edited)

A gluten allergy would be scientifically defined since allergic reactions engage the immune system in specific ways. Intolerances are typically conditions that cause lower GI distress, as in lactose intolerance. Gluten sensitivity falls short of celiac disease but is usually viewed as creating some sort of toxic reaction that has a more systemic effect and can manifest itself in various ways such as brain fog and neurological problems. It does not damage the mucosa of the small bowel like celiac disease does. This is my understanding of the differences between these gluten-related medical conditions. The problem isn't so much differentiating them medically and scientifically but rather the confusion of the terms in the populace as driven by the indiscriminate use of these terms by marketing and pop science, which tends to lump all of them under the heading of "gluten intolerance" or "gluten allergy." Gluten sensitivity may be a precursor to celiac disease.

"Leaky gut" is the result of the damage done to the SB mucosa and is the chief defining characteristic of celiac disease. Dermatitis Herpetiformis is also considered to be a certain indicator of celiac disease. So if you have leaky gut I would certainly be tested for celiac disease since celiac disease does in fact have a genetic basis. We know the genes responsible. But it takes both the genes and a triggering event such as a viral infection to wake up the genes and produce an active condition of celiac disease. Otherwise, it remains in a latent form. Many people with the genes do not experience a triggering event and therefore the genes are not expressed in active celiac disease. Once you develop active celiac disease it does not go away. You will always need to avoid gluten entirely. Celiac disease is classified as an autoimmune disease since the ingestion of gluten by people whose celiac genes have been activated by a stressor (such as a viral infection) causes inflammation in the small bowel mucosa that damages the villi. In other words, the body is attacking itself. This in turn causes leaky gut and poor absorption of nutrients. Poor absorption of nutrients in turn causes a host of other medical conditions over the course of time. The turning on of the genes to wake up the latent celiac disease can happen at any time in life. Many with active celiac disease do not experience dramatic GI symptoms, at least at first. We call them "silent celiacs." Various medical conditions down the road typically develop, however.

The first stage of diagnosis of celiac disease is to get a serum celiac antibody panel done. The damage to the small bowel produces some characteristic antibodies. If the serum antibody panel is positive for celiac disease, especially if the results are not strongly indicative, the physician may order an endoscopy and biopsy of the small bowel to check for microscopic villi damage. Sometimes the damage is so severe the doc doing the scoping can see it even before sending the biopsy to the lab for analysis.

I would suggest you look into this. By the way, the inability to absorb fats is very common in celiac disease because of the damage to the SB mucosa and so people with celiac disease often see oily/fatty residue in their stools until the gluten free diet allows their villi to heal. That may take a year or more. I mention that in connection with your OP about canola oil.

Edited by trents

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



raspberryfirecracker Contributor
9 hours ago, Hoody123 said:

pathology courses in massage therapy school

This is not the same as being a diagnostician; knowing a disease exists doesn't make anyone a medical doctor trained to diagnose diseases.

9 hours ago, Hoody123 said:

I was diagnosed with IBS and leaky gut in college when I first developed these reactions. I was not born with them. Therefor I do not have a genetic disease

This isn't an accurate understanding of celiac disease, Hoody. You are born with the genes, but genetic diseases can either be active from birth, get triggered in adolescence, or get triggered in adulthood. People who have genes for Huntington's for example, will start developing nerve damage in their 30s and 40s. 

9 hours ago, Hoody123 said:

I believe celiac to be . . . (one of the strongest on the scale). I do not know if my understanding is correct

It's not correct. Celiac disease is not "the strongest" response to gluten on a scale of symptom severity. Someone who has a severe allergy to wheat gluten might go into anaphylaxis and die from exposure to a breadcrumb, and someone who has celiac could get a rash, mild bloating, and a headache and have no idea it's because of what they ate.

It's genetic in that, you inherit genes which come with these instructions to the immune system: If you find the presence of gluten, produce antibodies. Those antibodies are what do the damage, to our own tissues. Celiac is an autoimmune disease, and is one of the "great imitators." Stress makes any autoimmune disease worse, and easing stress makes any disease easier to live with, but it doesn't stop the underlying illness.

Your descriptions sound exactly like so many people here before we accepted we might have more than "an intolerance" which we could control by just living better. I count myself in that group. What you wrote is frightening, because we know that kind of denial, and we know how bad the disease sometimes has to get before people in denial are forced to acknowledge it. The truth is celiac disease is a silent killer. The truth is anyone with gluten intolerance should be evaluated by a doctor who can test for the antibodies, genes, and a biopsy if necessary (they're starting to diagnose without the biopsy if other tests are overwhelmingly positive) because it will get worse. Undiagnosed people just get diagnosed with other, seemingly unrelated diseases that never needed to occur if they'd have stopped ingesting gluten sooner. There is no easier time to live gluten free than right now. I wish you the best.

raspberryfirecracker Contributor

(And what trent said--sorry I didn't see there was a page two until I'd already replied!)

  • 4 years later...
gailc Newbie

I get coughing and choking from canola oil. I cough up stuff.  Symptom is like bronchitis.  I have gluten intolerance, maybe celiac.  the choking persists for about a week, it simulates a cold.  I got it from the gluten free menu at Outback too, that time I got cramps for 25 hours. the cramps start about 20 minutes after finishing eating.

 

  • 1 month later...
SoBannaz Rookie

No I use canola oil all the time never had a problem (yet) my body is so crazy who knows. But yes I can use canola oil and olive oil. I stay away from vegetable oil because of the soy, soy makes my throat tight it’s the reason I no longer eat chicken unless it’s from krogers because I noticed it made my throat tight looked up on their website majority of those chicken companies feed their chickens soy. The only brand I can tolerate is the one in Kroger’s Simple Truth. 

trents Grand Master

@SoBannaz, how are you using the term "vegetable oil"? I think all the oils you mentioned in your above post would be considered vegetable oils since they aren't made from animal tallow.

gailc Newbie

I avoid soy because of the link to breast cancer. I have had some scares and two biopsies. Not cancer.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.