Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Results


rebz

Recommended Posts

rebz Rookie

Here are my blood results.

total IgA - 4.38 g/L (0.8-2.8 normal range)

Endomysium IgA - negative

IgA gliadin - 35U/mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgG gliadin - 13 U.mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgA t-Transglutaminase 22 U/ml (normal range 0-15U/ml)

Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

I am waiting for an appointment with GI doc to discuss results. Before the biopsy he said he thought it would be negative with these blood results.

I am totally confused - I think he will say that these results don't indicate celiac because there is no villous atrophy etc... I am thinking he will tell me I have IBS. Am I in denial about this do you think or are these results as borderline as I think they are...

Any comments are greatly appreciated

Rebecca


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



2kids4me Contributor

My daughter had borderline results in bloodwork too, GI said: " Her results are as low as they can get and still be called positive - I am doing the biopsy to rule out celiac as a cause for her intestinal symptoms plus we can get a better idea of what might be going on." [rather than saying - we are doing this to confirm celiac]

Biopsy confirmed celiac - subtotal villous flattening with lymphocytic infiltration.

Lymphocytes are the white blood cell that responds to antigens - be it viral, bacterial or gluten causing an immune response.

I read somewhere that dairy can cause villous blunting as well (if the person is intolerant), but not to the same degree at gluten.

IBS is not a diagnosis - its an adjective to describe inflammed bowel when they dont know the cause /havent found the cause. Many so called "IBS" patients respond very well to gluten free.

We had reduced gluten to one piece of bread or a serving of cereal in the weeks prior to biopsy, Kathryn hated eating that gluten! Even before the results were known, Kathryn decided she never wanted "that evil gluten" again.

Sandy

nikki-uk Enthusiast
Here are my blood results.

total IgA - 4.38 g/L (0.8-2.8 normal range)

Endomysium IgA - negative

IgA gliadin - 35U/mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgG gliadin - 13 U.mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgA t-Transglutaminase 22 U/ml (normal range 0-15U/ml)

Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

I am waiting for an appointment with GI doc to discuss results. Before the biopsy he said he thought it would be negative with these blood results.

I am totally confused - I think he will say that these results don't indicate celiac because there is no villous atrophy etc... I am thinking he will tell me I have IBS. Am I in denial about this do you think or are these results as borderline as I think they are...

Any comments are greatly appreciated

Rebecca

It's possible that you've caught it before any real damage occured - or , damage can be patchy and maybe the biopsy sites missed it.

Something must have drove you to the docs in the first place symptom wise - so you've absolutely got nothing to lose by trying the gluten-free diet now you've had the biopsy :)

Nancym Enthusiast
Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

I believe this is recognized as a pre-celiac changes I think Dr. Lewey, and others, write about this. You might want to google it up.

Here's one: Open Original Shared Link

rebz Rookie

thank you for your replies.

I shall wait and see what the GI says before making any decision on a gluten-free diet. I am reluctant to start without a definite diagnosis of celiac and these results are not convincing to me, though maybe others would think they are ?

aikiducky Apprentice

If you decide to not go gluten free at this point, in my opinion you certainly should get another biopsy some time in the future (a year or two). I think it's very likely that you're in the early stages of intestinal damage, and the most sensible thing would be to go gluten free now before any more damage has a chance to happen, but if you don't want to do that, you should have a follow up biopsy later to see if the damage has progressed.

Pauliina

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Here are my blood results.

IgA t-Transglutaminase 22 U/ml (normal range 0-15U/ml)

Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

Any comments are greatly appreciated

Rebecca

Those were positive blood tests results. How many biopsies were done? 7 to 9 would be the optimum number but many doctors only take 1 to 3. You have 22 ft of small intestines, early in the disease the damage can be patchy and if the right spot is not biopsied you will not get an accurate result. If you need a good reason to stay gluten-free without a strong positive take a look at my signature. I do not show up in blood work and this delayed my diagnosis by many years. Without a positive blood test they never even thought to do an endo. I will never fully recover my brain function, after 5 years gluten-free what I live with is permanent. And I would not wish it on anyone. We do things backwards so often, doctors wait until damage is severe rather than 'inconvience' someone with a diagnosis that can prevent many other disease from ever showing up.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,292
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ems10
    Newest Member
    Ems10
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.3k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I think most of us, when we first got our diagnosis, imagined that going gluten free would be the magic the bullet that would restore us to perfect health. We soon find out that it usually isn't quite that simple and that celiac disease has long fingers.
    • Celiacsugh
      Thanks! I still have much to learn, I'd hoped going gluten-free would be a magic bullet and I'm learning my system is still very sensitive which is overwhelming and discouraging at times. Thanks for the yogurt tip! There is comfort in knowing that this is common during early healing and I'm not alone! 
    • Celiacsugh
      Thanks so much for the response. Are you usually able to pinpoint a trigger when you get the pain again? What I didn’t share in my earlier post is that I also usually eat out on weekends (though I share celiacs/needs to be gluten-free) and I’ve also been under a lot of stress lately in my personal life. While I’m speculating that it’s the wine it could certainly be a number of things. Do you ever notice the pain more when you are stressed? Learning so much about the brain/gut connection and celiacs. Thanks, there is comfort in hearing others have experienced similar symptoms. 
    • Raquel2021
      This was my main symptom. I still get it from time to time. Also feels like a burning pain on the upper abdomen. I think the wine could definitely cause the pain to be worse. There are do many things I still can't eat.
    • trents
      Yes and this is true of gluten free ready made, processed and prepackaged foods in general. In particular, hard to digest polysaccharides are commonly used in these products that give many celiacs issues and I personally don't handle some emulsifiers well. IMO, reactions to these ingredients are often mistaken for a gluten reaction.
×
×
  • Create New...