Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Follow Up Appointment On Tuesday


Emily Elizabeth

Recommended Posts

Emily Elizabeth Enthusiast

I have my 6 week follow up appointment since I was diagnosed next Tuesday the 26th and I am very nervous. The doctor told me that I would have to have another endoscopy if I was not doing better. Now I am definitely feeling better, but I am still having intestinal problems (loose stools at least 4 times a day) but it is better then it was before. I don't have the fogginess or extreme hunger and fatigue or the pregnant belly. I also have noticed that I get more sick when I am glutened (or suspect that I am) so that seems to tell me that I'm not ingesting it everyday (I wake up in the middle of the night and have to urgently go to the bathroom 2-3 times).

What advice do you all have? If they suggest an endoscopy should I do it? Also, they never tested me for vitamin deficiencies. Should I ask that they do that?

I assume that it is definite that I have celiac disease right (wishful thinking)? I guess they are just going to check to see if I may have something else in addition to it?

Here are my test results (not really sure what this means):

AGA IgG - 11.9 U/ml

AGA IgA - 5.9 U/ml

IgA ELISA (TTG IgA) - >100 U/ml

IgA IFA (EMA IgA) - Positive

Total IgA - 100 mg/dl

HLA DQ2 - Detected

HLA DQ8 - Not Detected

Biopsy - Inconclusive evidence of Celiac Disease (they did this first, then ran the blood test, they said that it was microscopic evidence)

Thanks for any help/advice you can give!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



wolfie Enthusiast

Not sure about your test results, but I do believe that the EMA that is marked positive in your bloodwork is indicative of damage in your small intestine from gluten/Celiac. Also, it can take an adult up to 2 years to completely heal from the damage in the intestines. So 6 weeks is a very short period of time when you look at that. I know that for myself, I could tell a difference immediately, but am feeling so much better now (1.5 years into the diet).

Another way to look at it is that the damage didn't happen overnight and won't heal overnight either.

(((HUGS))) Hope you are feeling better soon!

Emily Elizabeth Enthusiast

Thanks so much! I will keep looking forward to my 2 year mark!!

(((HUGS))) Hope you are feeling better soon!
aikiducky Apprentice

Also, it might make sense to do a follow up biopsy in the future to make sure that you have healed, but in my opinion (I'm not a doctor mind you) it would make more sense to do it after a year or two on the diet. If you do it after only six weeks, there's a chance that things haven't healed a lot yet, and then the doctor can draw the false conclusion that the diet isn't working, while in actuality it just needs more time.

If you really want to follow your progress on the diet, you could ask then to do the celiac panel again to see if the antibody levels have come down at all. Ttg levels are often used for follow ups.

It's encouraging that you have noticed a positive change in some symptoms! Keep up the good work!

Pauliina

Emily Elizabeth Enthusiast

Thanks for your advice! I am going to ask about doing the celiac panel instead of the biopsy if they recommend it. That would be much better! You have calmed my nerves.

If you really want to follow your progress on the diet, you could ask then to do the celiac panel again to see if the antibody levels have come down at all. Ttg levels are often used for follow ups.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,115
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dededrake
    Newest Member
    Dededrake
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...