Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Wheat Allergy In Addition To gluten-free?


alamaz

Recommended Posts

alamaz Collaborator

Recently I've read several posts where people are tested for a wheat allergy in addition to already being celiac/gluten-free. I'm confused- if you are already a celiac/gluten-free wouldn't you automatically be allergic to wheat?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Babygirl6915 Explorer

No. I am wheat allergy positive but not celiac positve. They have basically the same symptoms but nothing else is the same. Someone who has been on this board longer can probably be more specific but that is the general idea.

gf4life Enthusiast

An allergy is a immunoglobin E response in the body and the gluten intolerance/celiac is an immunoglobin A response.

Sometimes the symptoms can be similar, but more often than not the allergy is more of a inflammation/breathing problems/skin reaction and the intolerance is more of a digestive reaction. It is possible to have digestive issues with a food allergy though, and we all know that Celiac cna give you a whole range of symptoms, so they can't always tell the difference without the testing.

They test for them differently using different blood tests and with Celiac you also need the intestinal scope/biopsy.

With a wheat allergy you need to avoid wheat. With Celiac/gluten intoelrance you need to avoid all offending gluten grains.

It is possible to have one or the other, or both at the same time.

tarnalberry Community Regular

as gf4life explained, a wheat allergy and celiac disease are not the same thing. the treatment for the later encompasses the treatment for the former, but the underlying mechanism of the two conditions is different.

the wheat allergy is mediated by the IgE response mechanism of the immune system, which causes inflammation and histamine release, amongst other physiologic responses. in severe cases, a wheat allergy can cause anaphylactic shock upon exposure - basically such a profound and immediate manifestation of symptoms, that life is immediate risk.

celiac disease is an autoimmune response mediated by the IgA and IgG portion of the immune system, and creates a cascade reaction which directly attacks the intestines. in severe cases, celiac disease can cause total destruction of the villi in the intestines and provide a mechanism for other markers to get into the general blood supply from the intestines which are not supposed to do this. it most certainly can be life-threatening, but not over the course of a handful of hours in an otherwise healthy person.

the treatment is nearly the same, but the mechanics are very different.

alamaz Collaborator

Interesting thanks. I guess I just assumed if you are a celiac you are automatically allergic to wheat even though gluten is the protein that you are actually allergic too.

elonwy Enthusiast

Celiac isn't an allergy. I have a topical allergic response to wheat, which means if I touch it, then I get a rash and hives. This is an allergic reaction, and is completely secondary to my Celiac Disease. It is not a reaction to gluten, it is a reaction to something else in wheat. I could rub rye or barley on my skin all day, and not get a reaction (not that I want to, but I did touch barley just to check).

So it is very possible to be a celiac and also have a wheat allergy. It just makes you extra, extra careful.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,115
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dededrake
    Newest Member
    Dededrake
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...