Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question About Vaccinations


gfgypsyqueen

Recommended Posts

AndreaB Contributor
just out of curiosity, have vaccines changed since people who are now adults recieved them? One would think they would have become "safer", or is it the same ol stuff that kids are getting now? thoughts?

One that I know of has changed since we were kids. I don't know how old you are so I can't verify that. I do know that the old DTP is now DTaP.

As far as them being safer, nope. They may have had most of the thimerosal removed but they still have other harmful adjuvants which harm many children. They were made more potent than a lot of children can handle due to trying to get them to take in the 5% of the children that didn't respond to them.

The sheer quantity is another problem. Many problems have been linked to vaccines although I don't believe they are the whole problem, they are a part of it. SIDS, Shaken Baby Syndrome, Autism Spectrum Disorders have all been linked to vaccines. Then you also have intolerances/sensitivities which I believe can be linked. I haven't researched any of that though, my baby is the one who led me to that conclusion.

A good site to look into if you are interested is www.nvic.org


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lfij Newbie
One that I know of has changed since we were kids. I don't know how old you are so I can't verify that. I do know that the old DTP is now DTaP.

As far as them being safer, nope. They may have had most of the thimerosal removed but they still have other harmful adjuvants which harm many children. They were made more potent than a lot of children can handle due to trying to get them to take in the 5% of the children that didn't respond to them.

The sheer quantity is another problem. Many problems have been linked to vaccines although I don't believe they are the whole problem, they are a part of it. SIDS, Shaken Baby Syndrome, Autism Spectrum Disorders have all been linked to vaccines. Then you also have intolerances/sensitivities which I believe can be linked. I haven't researched any of that though, my baby is the one who led me to that conclusion.

A good site to look into if you are interested is www.nvic.org

thanks! honestly, i really had never heard any of this and I find it really interesting to think about for my future kids! I've heard of people not vacinating children but never have heard any real reason to think about that untill now!

Michi8 Contributor
just out of curiosity, have vaccines changed since people who are now adults recieved them? One would think they would have become "safer", or is it the same ol stuff that kids are getting now? thoughts?

and, can kids get into school without any vaccinations or real religious cause to not recieve them?

(I don't have children yet, but am curious for when I do)

thanks in advance =D

There are many more vaccinations given now. At the time I was an infant and child the smallpox vaccine was given and probably diptheria, tetanus and polio vaccines as well. I contracted chicken pox when I was about 6 yo. MMR vaccine didn't exist, and I contracted both red measles and rubella in the same spring/summer, and now I have full immunity against both. I didn't receive the pertussis vaccine either, and have never contracted the disease, though my brother did.

In Alberta you don't need more than to say no to vaccines. I was a little worried about how the school and health nurses would react, but they were actually respectful and have marked down not to contact me with vaccination reminders (my eldest is fully vaccinated, my second partially vaccinated and my youngest not vaccinated at all.) :)

Mcihelle

lovegrov Collaborator

OK. Both of our children got all the vaccinations (pre-chicken pox, and they both came down with chicken pox) and neither one had any negative reactions of any sort that we could determine. Just like the vast majority of kids.

richard

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
just out of curiosity, have vaccines changed since people who are now adults recieved them? One would think they would have become "safer", or is it the same ol stuff that kids are getting now? thoughts?

and, can kids get into school without any vaccinations or real religious cause to not recieve them?

(I don't have children yet, but am curious for when I do)

thanks in advance =D

There are two MAJOR changes since we were kids.

One is the use of "multiple" vaccines, where there are 3 or more vaccines together in one shot. There has been NO long-term research on the safety of this.

The other, as mentioned above, is the sheer number of vaccines given. In the late 90's, the recommended vaccine schedule included 26 vaccines by the age of 18 months. Again, no long-term research exists proving the safety of this schedule. And, as far as I know, they have introduced more and more vaccines since the late 90's, so there may be even more required now.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
OK. Both of our children got all the vaccinations (pre-chicken pox, and they both came down with chicken pox) and neither one had any negative reactions of any sort that we could determine. Just like the vast majority of kids.

richard

Where do you get the "vast majority" of kids?

I do not intend to be argumentative here. It's just that all three of my kids reacted--but only one reaction got reported. The pediatrician at the time didn't know about the other two because the nurse who spoke to me on the phone didn't consider their reactions to be reactions. The pediatrician said later--years later--that they were indeed reactions.

Many of us don't get as far as the pediatrician when our children have reactions. We have to go through the nurse on the phone, and my understanding from one of them is that they consider their job on the phone to be that of making the load lighter on the pediatrician and warding off the "non-serious" cases.

I know MANY parents of autistic kids. Not all of them had discernable reactions, of course. But most of the ones I know had the same--and far worse--experiences as I did, where they were told that their child was fine, they were imagining things, there was no way int could be a reaction to the vaccine, etc. (Rather similar to what many of us here have been told about gluten, wouldn't you say?)

And I know one family who had video footage of their child, the day before the vaccine, and the day after. And the difference is truly shocking. In the first, the child appears normal, happy, and is both verbally and visually responsive to his parents. In the second, he appears SEVERELY autistic.

I agree that many children are not affected by the vaccines. But so many have been affected, and so many of us have been blown off by the medical community, that I can't help feeling dissed when you say that the vast majority is not affected. I really believe that there are many, many more affected than what's been reported by the physicians.

My parents never knew ANY other parents of severely autistic children.

I know 12--10 of them in Pittsburgh, most of those in our school district. And that's not counting the high-functioning/Asperger's Syndrome/PDD kids. I can't even count how many I know. And I don't go to any of the support groups, so it's not like I met them there--these are families I met at the doctor's office, at school, at playgrounds, at the synagogue, etc.

Esther Sparhawk Contributor
And I know one family who had video footage of their child, the day before the vaccine, and the day after. And the difference is truly shocking. In the first, the child appears normal, happy, and is both verbally and visually responsive to his parents. In the second, he appears SEVERELY autistic.

There's a family in my community who has similar video footage of their son's fourth birthday party, where he's perfectly normal, then one week later (after vaccination) he's clearly autistic.

It's scary that the medical community is in the dark about this. When I saw my daughter's abnormal reaction to vaccines during her baby years, our school nurse chewed me out about buying into society's fear frenzy, and she made me cry. I knew something wasn't right, and I thank God I went with my own maternal instincts and postponed vaccination until later, when we discovered she was a celiac; we didn't vaccinate until even later still when she was a healthy celiac.

Whenever I see our school nurse, I can't even look at her without thinking "you idiot"!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,597
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Caroline Alexandria
    Newest Member
    Caroline Alexandria
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.