Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Transglutaminase #'s


amberleigh

Recommended Posts

amberleigh Contributor

I saw a few posts where people mentioned specific numbers from blood tests so I just called the nurse at my GI's office (who is a huge ditz, BTW) and she said my transglutaminase number was 30 and that anything greater than 8 is positive for celiac disease.

What is the range on this? Is 30 relatively high, medium, or low? What does this really mean?

I'm obviously in denial about celiac disease b/c I've been feeling pretty good the last 2 weeks (even on gluten foods) so I'm just trying to educate myself as best I can. Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



DingoGirl Enthusiast

Welcome, Amber. :)

TTG is an antibody manufactured to attack gluten (in case you didn't know). In "normal" people the number will measure from zero to less than 10, I believe. Thirty is definitely a sign of Celiac.....

When mine was measured.....oh, I was so, so sick. My TTG measured "greater than 100" and they STOP counting after 100....so who knows what it really was. But it was rather alarming. At the six-month mark, it was down to 17, and at the one-year mark it was THREE! :rolleyes: To say I feel like an entirely different human is quite an understatement.

I suspect the numbers become higher the longer one has undiagnosed Celiac.....but I'll let the experts pipe in here.

I hope you don't stay in denial about Celiac for too long......it'll catch up to you, and the younger you are at time of dx, and the sooner you remove all gluten, the better off you'll be. I was 44, lost an inch in height (my spine is a mess, bone density loss and many other things) and grew to live with an incalculable depression and fatigue toward the end.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,118
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Momoosa
    Newest Member
    Momoosa
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...