Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Spelt?


Nyxie63

Recommended Posts

Nyxie63 Apprentice

While wandering around the health food store, I noticed that some products were labeled gluten-free but had spelt in them. Isn't spelt a species of wheat? How in the world can they label something like that as gluten-free? While it may have a lower amount of gluten, its still gluten. I've even noticed that one of the gluten-free sites has spelt listed in some of its recipes. I don't know a whole lot about this, but it just doesn't seem right.

So, is it or isn't it safe?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cruelshoes Enthusiast

Spelt is an ancient form of wheat. It is lower in gluten, but still off limits for the gluten-free diet.

Open Original Shared Link

Spelt is closely related to common wheat, and is not suitable for people with celiac disease. It is possible that spelt is suitable for people with a wheat allergy.....

I have often seen spelt products labeled as "wheat free", but I have not seen them labeled as "gluten free". Can you tell me what gluten-free internet site says spelt is safe? Moreover, it is often stated that spelt may be tolerated by those with a wheat allergy, but we all know that celiac disease is not an allergy, so it's still on the bad list.

Your instinct and knowledge is correct - Spelt is not a safe choice on the gluten-free diet.

Nyxie63 Apprentice

Thanks for the info! I'm still new at this and didn't say anything when I was at the health food store. What caught my eye was the gluten-free label, and then I read the ingredients and it said spelt. Thus my confusion. Next time I'm in there, I'll say something to the staff.

And I had a brain fart. Looked at the site again and it was sorghum, not spelt that was listed in the recipes. Should really be properly caffeinated before reading/posting. :P Sorry about that.

psawyer Proficient

Sorghum is safe. Spelt is indeed a form of wheat and according to some sources has an even higher concentration of protein (gluten) than ordinary wheat. Spelt is defintely to be avoided. You can make a decent gluten-free beer substituting sorghum for barley.

4getgluten Rookie

Avoid Spelt - from my first hand experience, I can tell you - it is not safe! 2 weeks into my gluten-free diet, I tried some Spelt bread. I thought it would be safe... wrong.. I was so sick!

Green12 Enthusiast

It's a little alarming to hear you found products with spelt labeled as "gluten-free".

Ususally they label spelt products as "wheat free" or as a "wheat alternative", but they should never read gluten-free.

blueeyedmanda Community Regular

Wow, I never saw that either. I will have to take a closer look next time I am at the health food store. Thanks for the heds up.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Nyxie63 Apprentice

The next time I go there, I'll jot down the brand names and products. Funky, huh?

ruthla Contributor
It's a little alarming to hear you found products with spelt labeled as "gluten-free".

Ususally they label spelt products as "wheat free" or as a "wheat alternative", but they should never read gluten-free.

Before I went completely gluten-free, and was just avoiding wheat, I bought a loaf of Trader Joe's 100% whole spelt bread. On the ingredient panel, it listed "spelt flour (wheat)" followed by whatever other ingredients were in it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,814
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    judy regina
    Newest Member
    judy regina
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Yes, there is a trend in the medical community to forego the endoscopy/biopsy and grant an official celiac diagnosis based on high tTG-IGA antibody scores alone. This trend started in the UK and is spreading to the USA medical community. And yes, 5-10x the normal level is what I have been seeing as the threshold as well. Here is the relevant section dealing from the article above dealing with the importance of the total IGA test being ordered. See the embedded attachment.
    • hmkr
      Ok, interesting. Not what I was thinking that meant. I'm reading the article and trying to understand. I see this “According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy” My IgG is 90, which is 6 times. So to me that means it's highly likely I do have it. 
    • trents
      It just means you aren't IGA deficient, i.e., that IGA deficiency cannot have given you artificially low scores in the individual IGA celiac antibody tests. This is explained in the article Scott linked above.
    • hmkr
      Normal range: 70 - 400 mg/dL, a little above middle of the range. So what does that mean? Thank you! I will check out that page you linked. Appreciate it! 
    • trents
      Well, the only thing I would conclude with would be, if you choose not to trial the gluten free diet, is to encourage you to get periodically tested, either antibody blood tests or the biopsy or both. I think it something that needs to be monitored.
×
×
  • Create New...