Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Fructose Malabsorption - Help Needed


shimo

Recommended Posts

shimo Rookie

Hi everyone,

By any chance is someone on this board familiar with FM?

I have a big dilema here. Let me keep the story short. Me and my mom have the same exact symptoms and almost the same reactions to food for years and years (the difference is she tolerates pain less then I do, but well... she's older and much more tired of it).

She always "knew" it was on what she used to eat so she never really paid attention to it and well, she has her own diet with problems here and there. I obviously got tired of having symptoms so I went to see my doctor and voila. AntiBody tests suggested Celiac Disease, so I was instructed to eliminate gluten and see how things went until I could get a biopsy done (which will be in less then a month - I can't wait).

Now, even though I got almost an immediate symptom relief (not all of them but most of them, and they became less frequent), I never got at 100%. Meaning, I would still be bloated now and then, still be depressed for no reasons at all, and all the other celiac symptoms. They were just not THAT frequent anymore.

I finally had convinced my mom to get her tests done so her doctor decided to order some tests (very expensive ones compared to mine btw). Her samples were sent for analysis to a Center in Germany (she's in Belgium). 3 Weeks later, the tests come back - Fructose Intolerance and "Slight" gluten intolerance but apparently, it cannot be Celiac Disease because Fructose was way higher in the chart. I am not sure what kind of test it was because I do not live with her anymore...

I'll get my doc to test me for that as well, however let me tell you that staying away from Fructose/Sorbitol seems to have an effect on me. I was actually already staying away from it without noticing. Examples are... most of the juices out there would make me sick, and I started to think they all used Gluten as preservatives or whatever (while some of them do not do that). So water is all I drink for at least 2 months... I guarantee that if I take a glass of fruit juice I get sick, it's almost immediate especially if it's Tropical flavours. I tolerate orange juices more or less; but I still avoid them so I don't have any surprises.

I am going to get a test for this asap, but just wanted to share this with other people that might have the same problem. This sucks! I just wonder what I will be able to eat after all this... even if celiac disease is not confirmed on the biopsy and FM is confirmed, I will still have to avoid Wheat anyway... nothing will change.

It still sucks if it's Fructose. The "forbidden" ingredients list is way bigger then celiac disease.

This is crazy.

I read that some people with Celiac Disease also have Fructose Malabsorption or Lactose Intolerance, or sometimes everything together. Is this the case of someone here?

This is what I currently have to stay away of in order to feel "normal". So far, with a trial and error diet, this is what I found:

- Onions

- Most fruits (Found out that strawberry, banana, and citrus seem to be harmless for me)

- Tomato (and everything connected to it)

- Sorbitol (This one is really bad for me, found that out with a product from Sch


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



hathor Contributor

I can't really help you on fructose intolerance. I have enough problems dealing with gluten, casein, egg, soy & yeast intolerances, plus being a vegetarian. And I think I have a problem with flax and/or sorghum too ...

However, I will say that having a "higher" score for one intolerance than another doesn't mean that you only have to worry about the highest one. At least with the folks who tested me (Enterolab), they say, positive is positive. The score is irrelevant. I have the strongest reaction to one of my lowest scoring items.

Also, a red flag jumps out in your post. You were told to go OFF gluten and you are going to be biopsied in a month? The test results won't be valid. You have to be on gluten for a substantial period of time for the test to mean anything.

I think you have your answer as far as gluten is concerned. You had the antibodies and a positive reaction to the diet. Complete healing can take some time. (It is also true you could have another intolerance.) There is nothing the biopsy could tell you worth getting sick for, assuming you rescheduled so you can start loading up on gluten for a few months so the biopsy would be meaningful.

Since your doctor doesn't know about not going gluten-free until after biopsy, I wouldn't trust him to know how to do and read the biopsies either <_<

shimo Rookie
I can't really help you on fructose intolerance. I have enough problems dealing with gluten, casein, egg, soy & yeast intolerances, plus being a vegetarian. And I think I have a problem with flax and/or sorghum too ...

However, I will say that having a "higher" score for one intolerance than another doesn't mean that you only have to worry about the highest one. At least with the folks who tested me (Enterolab), they say, positive is positive. The score is irrelevant. I have the strongest reaction to one of my lowest scoring items.

Also, a red flag jumps out in your post. You were told to go OFF gluten and you are going to be biopsied in a month? The test results won't be valid. You have to be on gluten for a substantial period of time for the test to mean anything.

I think you have your answer as far as gluten is concerned. You had the antibodies and a positive reaction to the diet. Complete healing can take some time. (It is also true you could have another intolerance.) There is nothing the biopsy could tell you worth getting sick for, assuming you rescheduled so you can start loading up on gluten for a few months so the biopsy would be meaningful.

Since your doctor doesn't know about not going gluten-free until after biopsy, I wouldn't trust him to know how to do and read the biopsies either <_<

Hey, thanks for replying.

Well as far as the biopsy thing, I am not gluten free for a lot of time. I didn't know you had to stay gluten-free until the biopsy, aren't the villi supposed to take months to heal? I guess that's valid for IGA tests, not sure if it is for the biopsy.

Anyhow I'll trust him for now, he won't read it or do it himself, this is going to be performed by a GI at the clinic I suppose. He isn't even going to be there.

I will however mention this to him and check what he has to say about it.

hathor Contributor

Please do some more research on this, rather than just relying on your doctor. He already told you to stop eating gluten prior to the test, so he doesn't know. We've had plenty of threads about doctors being wrong, about this and other things.

I ran a search and here are the results:

Open Original Shared Link

I don't know if that is the best search I could have ran, but you can see that this isn't just some notion of mine. I think everyone who has discussed this on this forum agrees with me.

It can take months to heal, or the healing can be quicker. I've seen plenty of folks mention false negatives with the biopsy because their doctors were wrong about the gluten ingestion. If the damage you may have to your villi is minimal (so far), it could heal before your endoscopy.

You might start a new thread on this topic for more information for those who have gone through this themselves -- either getting false negatives because they didn't eat gluten or not enough for long enough, or suffering because their doctors (correctly) tell them that they need to be consuming gluten for the test to be valid. Folks aren't seeing this subject and commenting now because the thread title is about fructose.

You also have to ask yourself what you would do if the biopsy is negative and you have been off gluten for an appreciable time, with positive results. Will you start eating it again? People are suffering damage from eating gluten before there is noticeable damage to the villi. Does it make sense to wait until the damage is done first?

shimo Rookie

Hi again,

Yep, not arguing or contesting that. I do believe what you're saying.

I'll ask him about this on the next appt. This does not surprise me though. :)

Thanks for the inf and have a good xmas!

hathor Contributor

Thanks! Read this forum and ask questions; that's what I did. It has helped me immensely and I think that is true for many here.

aikiducky Apprentice

A quick google found this wikipedia article on fructose malabsorbtion: Open Original Shared Link

Somewhere in there there's a mention of the connection between FM and wheat (since you asked!)

There's another connection with celiac though since FM can be a consequence of a damaged intestine. I wonder if staying gluten free for a long time people sometimes see their FM resolving?

I agree you shouldn't be gluten free before biopsy.

Pauliina


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 4 months later...
Flowerpj Newbie

Hi Shimo,.

I'm new here and had to reply. My husband was diagnosed about 2 weeks ago with Fructose Malabsorption and also Lactose intolerance via a breath test. Here's the funny part - For the past 10 years he has been unwell and feeling lousy and after a blood test about 7 years ago, his GP told him he had coeliac thus he went on a Gluten Free diet. Most of the time he felt fine but there were occasions when he just wasn't right and we always wondered what gluten snuck in to his food.

As we live a few hours from most of the specialists he never saw a dietician. Prior to his breath test he had a colonoscopy and the doctor told him to have this breath test, he also said he had tested for coeliacs via a biopsy and it was negative (and it would be after being on a gluten free diet for almost 7 years) he also said that he tested with a biopsy when they were trying to figure out what was wrong with him 7 years earlier and it was negative then (news to us because we didn't know the had tested him for that).

We always knew that it had not been confirmed with a biopsy but hey he felt better most of the time.

Now, we are just trying to get our heads around another diet, and we thought gluten free was bad! This onion and onion salt is in almost everything.

I've spent the last few days searching the net for forums like this which has recipes and ideas for FM diet.

I am in Australia and alot of the recipes are from USA which include items I don't think we can get here other than stand for hours in the shopping isles looking for substitutes.

Any ideas and suggestions you can pass on would be great,

Thanks in advance,

Flower

AliB Enthusiast

As a Metabolic 'Protein' type I have never been able to cope with much in the way of fruit and could never figure out why.

I always needed plenty of protein otherwise I get headaches and I have never been able to cope with carbs either. I couldn't figure out why on that either.

A few weeks ago I discovered the Metabolic Typing Diet and after doing the questionnaire it confirmed that I am a fast-oxidiser Protein metabolic type.

The only fruit it listed for my type is pretty much the only fruit I can cope with - no more than 3 bananas a week, some apple and some pear - cooked is better. Other than what is on the list I can cope with a few blueberries but that is all. It is weird - as I looked at the food list for my type it all made sense.

My background is Anglo-saxon originating from northern Scandinavia where the diet would have consisted mainly of meat and fat and little in the way of carbs. Some originate from climes where carbs would be the predominant staple and many sit at some point on the scale between the two. It's the extreme protein types who seem to have the most problems as our 'Western' diet is structured around so much in the way of carbs.

I have been following it now for 3 weeks and gradually my body is starting to sort itself out.

Juliebove Rising Star

I thought I had a problem with fructose but then someone who knows more than me about nutrition surmised that it might in fact be sorbitol I have a problem with. And in fact I can not eat any foods sweetened with sorbitol because it makes me quite ill.

I have never been a big fruit eater. But I used to like cantaloupe and would sometimes have 1/2 of one for lunch filled with cottage cheese and accompanied perhaps by some fresh berries. My dad had raspberry bushes. I could eat those, blackberries huckleberries and strawberries with no problems. Apples and pears were not a problem. I could eat grapefruits, but oranges would give me mouth blisters as would fresh (but not canned) pineapple. This was in the days before I knew of my food allergies.

Then one day we were at an all you can eat buffet in Las Vegas. Even then I was a picky eater and at the time a vegetarian. I did not like eating sweets like pastries for breakfast and that was mostly what they had. I took a little bit of something and was still hungry. So I went back for some canteloupe slices. I started eating them and suddenly was doubled over with stomach pain. It was so bad I could not move from my seat and after sitting there in misery for close to 2 hours, I was told I needed to leave so someone else could use the table.

That was the start of it. Now, many fruits leave me with stomach pain. I can eat non sweet fruits like cucumber and tomato. I can eat cooked apples and pears. Can even eat a very small amount of raw apple with no problem. But not a whole apple. And no problem with pears. Or strawberries. One single raspberry gave me stomach pains, but I also have gastroparesis so that could be the cause of that. But melons? Forget about it! I am doubled over with stomach pain.

I can't really say much about other fruits because I don't eat them. I am diabetic and shouldn't really be eating much fruit. I will occasionally have grapefruit and that doesn't cause a problem. Or a few cherries from our tree. But mostly I just stay away from fruit because I can't stand the pain!

RiceGuy Collaborator

I don't know if candida has anything to do with it, but I'd think that would be something to look into. This board has tons of posts on the subject, which you might find helpful.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    2. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    4. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,136
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    GFTom
    Newest Member
    GFTom
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
    • Jmartes71
      I also noticed I get debilitating migraines when I smell gluten, wheat and its not taken seriously when it affects one in every way.Im still begging to properly be heard.I also noticed tolerance level is down the drain with age and life changes. I have been told by incompetent medical that im not celiac or that sensitive. Diagnosed in 1994 by gi biopsy gluten-free ever since along with other lovely food allergies. Prayers
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.