Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gone Gluten Free But Need Diagnosis?


Jackyhy

Recommended Posts

Jackyhy Newbie

Hi all, just had a question and I'm not sure if my doc will know the answer. I have been feeling terrible for the past 2 years. Every since I got pregnant, I had 9 months of feeling like I had cancer and was going to die. Everyone kept saying it was just the pregnancy. My baby is now 15 months old and I am at my wits end. I have been to the doctor more this year than ever before. I feel horrible all the time. Migraines no energy, nausea, sick all the time. It can really beat a person down. After being sick on Christmas I had had enough. I know people that have been diagnosed with celiac disease after just generally feeling bad for a long time. I have not ever thought it might be celiac disease but my husband reminded me again what my diet has been like since having the baby. Cereal and bagels etc(nothing but gluten)anyway. I went gluten free three days ago and I feel great(I know that seems crazy and way too quick of a turn around but I feel human again). Everything tells you not to go gluten-free untill you see your Dr and get a diagnosis because after you go gluten-free it will be negative. I have a doctor that is pretty open to anything so I know he will order the lab for me but my real question is will the lab be negative even though I will have only been gluten-free for a few days to a week? Any input would be greatly appreciated!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



confusedks Enthusiast

A lot of people on this board think that your positive results would be enough to stay off of gluten. Ultimately you have to decide how important a diagnosis is. The one thing I really regret is not waiting to go gluten free, but I had other pressing health problems that forced me to do it, so... OH WELL!

If you want a better chance of getting positive lab work, you will need to stay on gluten. Keep in mind, if you have negative blood work, that doesn't mean you don't have Celiac.

You could also look into Enterolab because they do stool testing and you don't have to be actively eating gluten for results. The only issue there is if you want a "Celiac" diagnosis, they cannot do that! The can tell you if you are reacting to gluten though.

pixiegirl Enthusiast

For what its worth I didn't have any symptoms of Celiac until I was pregnant, that was my trigger I guess. It took me 11 years to figure out what was wrong with me. I went gluten-free on my own too and felt far better (not 100% but 80% better maybe) after just a few days. I ended up doing an entrolab test and found out I have both of the main celiac genes. But honestly I didn't need that to go gluten-free I was feeling so much better.

But I know I have it I don't need a biopsy (I did have one for another reason but by that time I had been gluten-free for 2 years) because every single time I've goofed with gluten I get soooo sick. Unlike some people here that say they miss gluten items (bread, pizza) I don't... they make me so ill that there is no joy associated with them for me.

I do eat gluten-free pizza (Chebe) and make my own bread but very rarely I've pretty much lost a lot of desire for simple carbs. I still like rice and potatoes and I eat rice pasta from time to time but I don't crave carbs any more.

Good luck!

Susan

Jackyhy Newbie

I absolutely feel the same way. (I know its only been a few days) Someone brought a huge plate of cookies to work and I never gave it a second glance. I am an ablolute sweets addict but I feel so great, I could care less about what I am giving up. It's totally worth it to feel human again. I guess my biggest question was whether I would still test positive after a week of being gluten free or if that was enough to make it negative.((If I truly am celiac) sounds like you got a diagnosis after being gluten free for a while so I'll probably go ahead and try. I do really want to know for my son who does seem to have some intolerances,had a milk protein allergy from birth, bloody stools and all, and he still seems fairly lactose intolerant. For me it doesnt really matter because I feel so much better I will stay gluten free no matter what the results. My husband is already a huge fan of me on this diet, I havent complained about how bad I feel for a full four days( a record) Thanks so much for all your help! I almost forgot, can anyone tell me the exact labs to have drawn? I work at a hospital so I will just tell my doctor what to order and have it drawn at work! Thanks again!!!

Jackie

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,168
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    hiam toufic
    Newest Member
    hiam toufic
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you have three symptoms of a gluten-related disorder: weight loss, brain fog and lose stools. Of the three, the lose stools that firm up when you cut back on gluten is the only symptom for which you have reasonable cause to assume is connected to gluten consumption since the other two persist when you cut back on gluten. But since you do not have any formal test results that prove celiac disease, you could just as easily have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). In fact, what testing you have had done indicates you do not have celiac disease. NCGS shares many of the same symptoms of celiac disease but does not damage the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. There is no test for it. A diagnosis for NCGS depends on first ruling out celiac disease. It is 10x more common than celiac disease. Some experts feel it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Eliminating gluten is the antidote for both. What muddies this whole question are two things: 1. Lack of official diagnostic data that indicates celiac disease. 2. Your persistence in consuming gluten, even though in smaller amounts. Your anxiety over the insomnia seems to outweigh your anxiety over the weight loss which prevents you from truly testing out the gluten free diet. What other medical testing have you had done recently? I think something else is going on besides a gluten disorder. Have you had a recent CBC (Complete Blood Count) and a recent CMP (Complete Metabolic Panel)? You say you don't believe you have any vitamin and mineral deficiencies but have you actually been tested for any. I certainly would be concerned with that if I was losing weight like you are despite consuming the high amount of calories you are.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @AndiOgris! Recently upgraded guidelines for the "gluten challenge" recommend the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten for at least 2 weeks to the day of testing to ensure valid testing, either for the antibody testing or the endoscopy/biopsy. 10g of gluten is roughly the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. So, there is a question in my mind as to whether or not your gluten consumption was intense enough to ensure valid testing the second time around. And was the tTG-IGA the only antibody test that was run? That is far from a comprehensive celiac panel. Concerning your negative biopsy, there is the possibility of patchy damage that was missed due to inadequate sampling as you alluded to. There is also the possibility that the onset of your celiac disease (if you have it) was so new that there had not yet been time to accumulate damage to the small bowel lining. Your total lack of symptoms at the time of diagnosis would seem to support this idea. Having said all that, and this is my informal observation from reading many, many posts like yours over the years, I wonder if you are on the cusp of celiac disease, crossing back and forth across that line for the time being. My suggestion would be to keep a close eye on this for the time being. Watch for the development of symptoms and request a more complete celiac panel a year from now. Here is an article that discusses the various antibody tests that can be run for celiac disease. Note: The EMA test is kind of outdated and expensive. It has been replaced by the tTG-IGA which measures the same thing and is less expensive to run.  
    • SaiP
      Hi, yes. Much more solid and firm, as opposite to diarrhea like when on gluten.
    • AndiOgris
      Hi all I have had a very confusing year with celiac disease (or perhaps not as it turns out) and wondered if anyone can help me make sense of it? My mother was diagnosed with celiac disease (in her 70s) a couple of years ago. I am in my early 40s and did not have any symptoms, but I took a blood test in November 2023 and it came back positive (TTG IGA 23.4 U/ml - normal range is below 7 U/ml). I was referred for a gastroscopy to confirm, which was scheduled for October 2024 (I use the UK health service, things move slowly!). The gastroscopy found no evidence of celiac disease.  My gastroenterologist has asked me to retake the blood test, and it just came back negative (TTG IGA 1.6 U/ml - normal range is below 7 U/ml). Given the long wait between my initial positive blood test and my gastroscopy, I reduced my gluten intake but never avoided it fully. In the 6 weeks before the gastroscopy and the second blood test, I made sure to eat at least two slices of bread a day as recommended, and often I had significantly more.  So what's going on? I understand that false positives are very rare for celiac blood tests, and usually associated with other serious diseases which I am fairly sure I don't have (my health is generally very good). After the negative biopsy, I thought that (i) either they did not take enough samples, or (ii) I have "potential celiac disease". But now that the second blood test has come back negative, I'm running out of plausible explanations...  Can anyone make sense of this? I have not spoken to my gastroenterologist yet - I wanted to get a better sense of where I am beforehand so that I can ask the right questions. Under the UK system, specialist doctors can be very hard to get hold of, so I need to make the most of my time with him! Thanks!        
    • trents
      Do you mean that your stools firmed up when you began to cut gluten from your diet?
×
×
  • Create New...