Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Interpreting Lab Results


Lizz7711

Recommended Posts

Lizz7711 Apprentice

Hi, i'm just trying to clarify the difference in diagnosing gluten sensitivity versus celiac disease.

I did entero lab first and these were the results:

antigliadin IgA : 56 (normal <10)

anti tTG IgA: 39 (normal <10)

microscopic fecal fat score: <300 units (normal)

anti-casein IgA antibody: 34 (normal <10)

Gene test: HLA-DQ 2,1 (subtype 2,6)

Then I did blood testing:

gliadin IgA antibody: 24.6 = weak positive

gliadin IgG antibody : 35.9 = moderate to strong positive

So I know I have gluten sensitivity for sure and one of the main genes for celiac (DQ2), but since the blood tests were positive, can I assume I do actually have celiac disease? I'd rather not do the endoscopy and do not really want an official diagnosis as this will then stay with me the rest of my life (insurance issues etc). My doc says I have celiac but he's not going to label it that way in the file unless I want him to. He's not the most knowledgable on the topic though, so that's why i'm asking the question here.

BTW, my 8 year old daughter did entero lab tests and was also positive on all, but does not have the DQ2 or 8 gene. We've been gluten free now for almost two months, so i probably will not pursue blood tests for her.

thanks for any input!

Liz


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Whether you are technically celiac or not is kind of a moot point. You still need to avoid gluten. If it will make it easier to get what is needed for your DD when she begins school to have you have the label 'celiac' then I would let him just put celiac in your file. If you are afraid of future impact on getting insurance the I would just let him put gluten intolerant. Although the two are really one and the same insurance companies for some reason think that intolerance is less serious, it's not but that is the way they think. Logical when you think about it since before we get the 'celiac' label we usually have run up hoards of other autoimmune problems and years of ill health due to US doctor reluctance to diagnose us till we are almost dead.

Ursa Major Collaborator

It looks like you definitely have celiac disease. But just because your daughter doesn't have an 'official' (here in North America anyway) gene, doesn't mean that she can't have celiac disease as well.

In any case, you are right that it doesn't matter. Neither one of you should be eating gluten (and that is for life), because it makes you sick. And since you've been gluten-free for a while, the biopsy wouldn't necessarily come back positive, anyway.

nora-n Rookie

Yourdaughter must have DQ6 as one of the DQ genes, and this is a subtype of DQ1. DQ5 is a subtype of DQ1 too, by the way.

DDQ1 seem to be even more gluten sensitive than DQ2 when they first are gluten sensitive, judging from all the postings here by DQ1 people.

Dr. Hadjivassiliou found that 20% of his gluten ataxia research subjects have DQ1.

I guess that gluten sensitive would be a good term.

nora

Lizz7711 Apprentice

Thanks for the advice...I agree with you that it really is the same as far as seriousness...and I think the medical world is beginning to catch on to the whole non-celiac gluten sensitivity issue.

I'm like you where i've had a whole lifetime of depression, adrenal and hypothyroid problems (undiagnosed), miscellaneous digestion issues...and now at the age of 42 I find out WHY--hopefully it's not too late to reverse some issues. My mom died two years ago of adenocarcinoma of unknown primary...had ulcers her whole life, then two years before cancer she had diarrhea for a year and weighed 87 pounds..they never did determine the cause exactly. My guess now is I got the DQ2 gene from her and she was probably celiac her whole life as well. It's so tragic how many people have died related to this without any knowledge of it, and how preventable it all could have been. But I look at it as my mom gave her life for us...if it wouldn't have been for her suffering and death...I never would have been on this path that led me to figure this all out for myself and my daughter and who knows what would have happened to us!

Whether you are technically celiac or not is kind of a moot point. You still need to avoid gluten. If it will make it easier to get what is needed for your DD when she begins school to have you have the label 'celiac' then I would let him just put celiac in your file. If you are afraid of future impact on getting insurance the I would just let him put gluten intolerant. Although the two are really one and the same insurance companies for some reason think that intolerance is less serious, it's not but that is the way they think. Logical when you think about it since before we get the 'celiac' label we usually have run up hoards of other autoimmune problems and years of ill health due to US doctor reluctance to diagnose us till we are almost dead.
Lizz7711 Apprentice

How did you figure out that you were also sensitive to nightshades and salicylates? I think I have a reaction to white potatoes (joint pain issues), but haven't noticed reaction to any other nightshades yet. I was trying to determine if my daughter has salicylate problems, initially that is what I looked at due to her terrible behavior issues (rage attacks, suicidal thoughts etc) as well as food additives/MSG. Do these issues resolve after being gluten-free for awhile? I imagine some of it is due to leaky gut issues?

It looks like you definitely have celiac disease. But just because your daughter doesn't have an 'official' (here in North America anyway) gene, doesn't mean that she can't have celiac disease as well.

In any case, you are right that it doesn't matter. Neither one of you should be eating gluten (and that is for life), because it makes you sick. And since you've been gluten-free for a while, the biopsy wouldn't necessarily come back positive, anyway.

Lizz7711 Apprentice

My daughter has DQ1 and DQ3...can't remember the subtypes right now and am not at home to check, but I think it was 6,7. That's interesting that DQ1 are more sensitive initially. My daughter's reactions, while she does have some abdominal pain and hard stool issues...what is most pronounced are her behavior issues when she gets offending foods--she just changes, gets SO impatient, demanding, mouthy, physically angry etc. She and I are both casein sensitive, and she is soy and egg senstive also (I probably am as well but didnt' test for it). I'm really focusing on gluten and casein as far as our diet goes though...still eating eggs occasiionally, and the only soy we get is in soy butter and incidental ingredietns of other foods.

anyway, thanks for your input!

Yourdaughter must have DQ6 as one of the DQ genes, and this is a subtype of DQ1. DQ5 is a subtype of DQ1 too, by the way.

DDQ1 seem to be even more gluten sensitive than DQ2 when they first are gluten sensitive, judging from all the postings here by DQ1 people.

Dr. Hadjivassiliou found that 20% of his gluten ataxia research subjects have DQ1.

I guess that gluten sensitive would be a good term.

nora


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to CeliacChica's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      41

      Muscle Twitching

    2. - knitty kitty replied to CeliacChica's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      41

      Muscle Twitching

    3. - knitty kitty replied to CeliacChica's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      41

      Muscle Twitching

    4. - Yaya replied to CeliacChica's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      41

      Muscle Twitching


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,157
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bronco76
    Newest Member
    Bronco76
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Yaya, from the JAMA study you refer to: "Taking 60,000 international units (IU) a day of vitamin D for several months has been shown to cause toxicity." No one on this forum is recommending  taking anywhere near that amount. We're talking about 5-10,000IU daily.
    • knitty kitty
      "Doses higher than the RDA are sometimes used to treat medical problems such as vitamin D deficiency, but these are given only under the care of a doctor for a specified time frame. Blood levels should be monitored while someone is taking high doses of vitamin D." Quoted from the Healthline article @Yaya linked above...  
    • knitty kitty
      https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2748796 If read carefully, this study @Yaya refers to was done on healthy people.   "Meaning  Among healthy adults, supplementation with higher doses of vitamin D did not result in improved bone health; further research would be needed to determine whether it is harmful." "...311 community-dwelling healthy adults without osteoporosis, aged 55 to 70 years, with baseline levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) of 30 to 125 nmol/L."   High dose Vitamin D doesn't have substantial benefits if your Vitamin D level is already normal. High dose Vitamin D is used to restore severely deficient Vitamin D levels to normal levels.  "...high-dose vitamin D therapy, as a useful tool to rapidly replete vitamin D status, may support immune function in the context of an acute or chronic infection" ...and... "Therefore, in the context of inflammation and conditions where anemia is prevalent, including chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and critical illness, high-dose vitamin D supplementation may be beneficial in rapidly repleting and maintaining 25(OH)D concentrations and may serve as a complement to other treatment regimens to improve anemia." "Among those who had insufficient 25(OH)D (<75nmol/L) at baseline, the High Dose group improved significantly and to a comparatively greater degree on the PRM." These quotes are from the articles I posted earlier.
    • Yaya
      My cardio did not hand me a study.  He just determined the dose for my size/weight. Here is one that is 4 days old:  https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/how-much-vitamin-d-is-too-much This is the D study: https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/expert-answers/vitamin-d-toxicity/faq-20058108 This is a boring video I'm watching on Celiac.    
    • Yaya
×
×
  • Create New...