Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Thoughts On Vytorin


lpellegr

Recommended Posts

lpellegr Collaborator

I started taking cholesterol meds at the same time I went gluten-free. I had tried niacin, but just couldn't cope with the flushing (which also itched like mad). My total cholesterol wasn't bad, but my lipid ratios weren't good. The lowest dose of Vytorin worked, keeping everything well below bad ranges, but I often wondered whether my numbers could have been bad due to gluten and I wondered how they would look now after a few years gluten-free. Now that the news about Vytorin not being any more effective than Zocor alone has come out, I stopped it and was thinking of having my doctor write a prescription for Lipitor. Since you never know if a generic has gluten I looked up "atorvastatin and gluten" on Google and found a link to one of these gluten-free forum threads referring to the book "The Cholesterol Con". I haven't read the book, but I've read lots of reviews and summaries online and I think I'm just going to say screw it and stop the cholesterol meds entirely. I have been trying to eat real, simple, unprocessed food that my great-grandmother would have recognized, and I'm going to keep that up. Butter instead of margarine, meat, veggies and fruits, cheese, beans, nuts, as little man-made food as possible. Like Michael Pollan says, "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants". I have spent most of my working life in the pharmaceutical industry, but I'm not going to swallow their products anymore without some proof I need them. Now the Zyrtec, that I'll keep - that really does make a difference. I'm not a Luddite, I'm not avoiding drugs, but if there's no proof that lowering my cholesterol will keep me alive longer or save me from disability, I'm not going to waste my money (and my insurance company's money). Thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

I think you have a good plan, as long as you keep your appointments to check those levels are not getting out of line. You may want to add olive oil, garlic and if you like it hummus to your daily diet. All will help with keeping those levels down. Remember to excercise on a regular basis also.

lpellegr Collaborator

But from what I've read there's really no proven medical value in keeping cholesterol numbers down. It doesn't reduce deaths from heart disease, and in some populations there is actually more death in low cholesterol than in high cholesterol groups. Sure, all the doctors believe that it's necessary to keep cholesterol low because teams of doctors with links to the manufacturers of statins told them so, but the studies don't show any consistent benefit. Other things are more likely risk factors for heart disease. I'm going to eat like my ancestors, most of whom lived to 80 or more, and see how I do.

Nancym Enthusiast

I'm pretty certain the cholesterol hypothesis of heart disease is dying a slow painful death. I do think cholesterol has a role to play, but the tests they currently use to detect it are not the ones they should be using. They should be using the VAP or NMR tests and looking for small pattern LDL particles.

Anyway, I found this doctor's blog to be very helpful in understanding it all. I suggest reading the archives. You'd be surprised at what he has to say about wheat and heart disease! Open Original Shared Link

Also, there was a GREAT Business Week article about this entire subject: Open Original Shared Link

Statins do work in some people (1 in 250 people that take them have a benefit) but it isn't because they reduce cholesterol. Doctors have been hyped up on reducing cholesterol but as Vytorin proved it isn't what makes the statins work. Meanwhile your all cause death mortality actually goes up when you're on a statin. We have cholesterol in our bodies for a reason...

  • 1 year later...
ranger Enthusiast

I've eaten butter (hate margarine) eggs, and meat all my life. I'm 63 and myHDL is 95 and my LDL is low. I eat small portions of meat, use olive oil a lot and a good amount of veges and fruit at least once a day. I really wouldn't want to take statins. Maybe wean yourself off slowly and keep track of your numbers.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,527
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Delightful
    Newest Member
    Delightful
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Lynnard
      Thank you! Eating out/take out has been half of my meals for a while so you are correct that this will be my biggest challenge. This has been a journey and I appreciate your help!
    • trents
      "Bonus points". I like that analogy!  At this point, the following article might be helpful: Eating out will be the biggest challenge and will present the most threat to avoiding gluten since you don't have control over how food is prepared and handled back in the restaurant kitchen. Become comfortable with asking questions of restaurant staff and requesting that your food be cooked in clean pots/pans/surfaces that haven't been used for gluten containing foods since last washed. In time, you will become more comfortable with taking control in these situations and learn to be appropriately assertive. One thing that will take time for you to get a handle on is how sensitive you are to minor amounts of gluten such as you might get in cross contamination scenarios. Each of us is different in that sense and there is no substitute for personal experience. When in doubt, however, avoid foods that you feel may be significantly cross contaminated. Better safe than sorry. In time, you will develop a sixth sense about these things.
    • Lynnard
      Thank you!  Yes - labs are above but Deamidated Gliadin was super high, tTG was a weak positive and Immunoglobulin A was way below normal which gives "bonus points" to the positive tests because it can also cause false negative results.  This information confirms my thinking and I really appreciate your feedback!!!  
    • trents
      By far, the most likely cause of villous atrophy in the Marsh 3 range is celiac disease but there are other possible causes. Did you also have positive antibody tests? My guess is that when you see your physician he/she will declare you to have celiac disease. Of course, the ultimate proof of the pudding will be if you experience definite improvement in symptoms after going gluten free which, since you have now completed testing, you should begin to do.  
    • Lynnard
      Hi again - I received the biopsy results but haven't had follow up appointment with Dr. yet.  Wondering if you could comment on this: "Duodenum, random, Biopsy (Cold Forceps): MILD VILLOUS BLUNTING WITH PROMINENT INTRAEPITHELIAL LYMPHOCYTES, CONSISTENT WITH SPRUE (MARSH TYPE 3A). See Comment. Negative for Infectious Organisms, Dysplasia or Malignancy. COMMENT: While characteristic, the histologic findings are not diagnostic for gluten-sensitive enteropathy / celiac disease. A number of additional entities can enter into the differential diagnosis of celiac disease based on the histologic features, including tropical sprue, bacterial overgrowth / stasis, unclassified sprue, specific food allergies, many drugs including NSAIDs, olmesartan and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and a wide range of autoimmune diseases including adult-onset autoimmune enteropathy, diabetes, thyroiditis, lupus and multiple sclerosis and occasionally common variable immune deficiency. History of drug take, celiac serologies, HLA-DQ status and response to a gluten-free diet might be a key for a definitive diagnosis" They say "consistent with Sprue (Marsh Type 3A)" and then comment that the findings are not diagnostic for celiac disease.  I thought Marsh type 3 was conclusive (and I know that 3A is the best outcome as it relates to intestinal damage). Is this just normal caveat language or am I missing something?  I had appt scheduled for tomorrow but Dr. is sick and now rescheduled to over a week from now.  Appreciate any insight you can offer in the mean time.  Thanks!!
×
×
  • Create New...