Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is Gluten Intolerance Stage One Of Celiac Disease?


CCM

Recommended Posts

CCM Rookie

I called the Celiac Hotline at the Univ of Chicago to ask about a study I saw described on Celiac Disease Research Center that is examining whether gluten intolerance should be considered a precursor to celiac disease rather than an independent condition.

What do folks on this forum know of this? I am guessing I am gluten intolerant (and dairy) because my blood test, and biopsy were negative, as were food allergy tests. Yet a gluten filled diet has been doing horrible things for me for years. So I am transitioning to a gluten-free diet.

I am wondering whether confirmed celiacs here went through a separate distinct phase of gluten intolerance that just got worse over time? Worse enough to be diagnosed as celiac?

Should I be concerned about the potential for long term health effects from untreated (or undiagnosed gluten intolerance) as someone with a confirmed case of celiac disease may be concerned about increased cancer risks, etc.?

Does anyone know how many people are gluten intolerant as opposed to celiac? I would think that more public education on the issue would lead to more cases of gluten intolerance.

Univ of Chicago seemed to have more celiac research posted on its website than other centers. Any good referrals to the latest research, especially on gluten intolerance vs. celiac disease?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jodie2DQ2 Apprentice

I have been wanting to ask the same question...as I was only tested for celiac after I was already gluten free and was negative. However my allergist did genetic testing and I have double DQ2 which is about the worst genetics for celiac from what I have learned. It is amazing to me that I can't say I have celiac disease....but I can't even eat one bite without my stomach feeling like a bomb went off inside. It seems to me that you are gluten intolerant until you have done enough damage to your intestines for the test to be positive. It does not matter anymore as I would not go back on gluten for any testing..I get too sick from the accidental glutenings as it is. Great post though. I will be interested to see the responses. Jodie

dbmamaz Explorer

Thats an interesting question . . i know people here have talked about a genetic test that shows which of 2 celiac genes you carry, and i guess if you have an intolerance and carry one of those genes, you could be likely to develop celiac. I havent seen any numbers for how many people who are negative for celiac but positive for food trials have the gene, that would be interesting.

HAK1031 Enthusiast

I know that both my brother and I have violent reactions to gluten, yet our bloodwork and his biopsy were clear. I didn't have a biopsy, however. I had the genetics test and I have the DQ2 allele, so my GI feels I am likely celiac or at least "pre-celiac" as he called it. I was only seriously ill for a few months before diagnosis, though I have had scattered symptoms all my life.

CCM Rookie

I noticed you are from CT. I grew up there and will be heading back this summer to visit family, the first time visiting on a gluten-free diet. Are there any active local groups there (preferably in the New Haven area) that I could get in touch with regarding places to shop for food, restaurants, etc.? I am trying to get as much info on gluten intolerance/celiac as I can before I head out because it would not surprise me if some other members of the family have this problem.

HAK1031 Enthusiast

I'm not from near New Haven, but I think I do remember hearing about support groups around there. I'm in the Greater Hartford area, and as of yet there's no support group near me. But I found this website: Open Original Shared Link

good luck!

HAK1031 Enthusiast

ok i guess this site won't let you post other sites...but google it. PS- I totally lied about there not being a group in my area. after 5 seconds of googling i found one right in my TOWN!! on this website no less!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Your question points not only to the fact that the state of the research and understanding of gluten-related disease is in flux but so is the terminology. It's getting more complicated all the time. The one thing that is becoming clearer to me is that gluten-containing grains (or at least their modern hybrids) may not be good for anybody and they are very bad for a certain percentage of the population.

Steve

Tim-n-VA Contributor

Is there a standard medical definition of "gluten intolerance"?

I've seen the term used here to cover a variety of situations some of which are probably pre- or early celiac.

hathor Contributor

I don't think there is a standard medical definition of gluten intolerance because the condition isn't even generally accepted. I think once there is an accepted test, the definition and the good statistics will follow.

I've heard 30% of the population. I've heard 10%. I've heard four to five times the number of people with celiac. Hard to tell. I believe Dr. Fine found that roughly 30% of the population gets a positive score on his tests. I don't know where these other folks' figures come from -- perhaps their own practices.

I think quite a bit of gluten intolerance is preceliac. But then there are people who react to gluten, not in their villi, but elsewhere in their bodies.

My position is that you shouldn't eat anything that makes you feel bad, whether the doctors have a name or test for your condition or not. Remember the doctors, with the then available testing and their accepted medical definition, used to think that celiac was very rare and presented nearly always in infants who had certain symptoms. Now that view is accepted as wrong. But the disease hasn't changed any.

CCM Rookie
I think quite a bit of gluten intolerance is preceliac. But then there are people who react to gluten, not in their villi, but elsewhere in their bodies.

Thanks for the feedback. I am guessing I could fall into that category of folks whose gluten intolerance reactions occur elsewhere than their villi. I deal with excessive gas intestinally, but that's it. The rest is my joints, bones, muscles, mood, reproductive tract, as well as fatigue and brain fog (so bad that I now finally understand why I was unable to complete graduate school).

I feel like my brain is finally starting to wake up now that I am going gluten-free.

Rosebud710 Apprentice

This is an interesting topic . . . when I tell people I can't eat gluten, some will ask if I'm celiac. This is where I'm sure I confuse them. Since I don't have immediate, digestive disturbances when I eat gluten, I never consider myself celiac. But I've learned (from this forum) that that's not the case. From what I've learned, based on the condition of my villi is how you determine celiac disease. Well, the only test I've had to determine my gluten intolerance is an antibodies test my doctor requested from my blood work. My antibodies were high, therefore, my body was fighting something and my doctor recommended I stop eating gluten. Well, since I've stopped eating gluten, I'm more healthier, my panic attacks have dramatically lessened (that could also be from me cutting caffeine out of my diet), and the bloating and gas has ended. I'm still at a loss as to whether I have an intolerance or if I have celiac.

In the meantime, I'm avoiding the confusion in the explanation of my dietary limitations. Whenever someone asks me if I'm celiac, I now say "yes, I am". It's just easier.

Nancym Enthusiast

Don't bother getting technical with people who ask, they're usually not really interested in a detailed answer and they're likely to think you're a hypochondriac if you explain that you're not a celiac but... Just leave it at "yes, I'm a celiac" or for the people that really are clueless tell them you're allergic to wheat, barley, rye and oats.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,710
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jose Luis Bondi
    Newest Member
    Jose Luis Bondi
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.4k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      I’d say celiac is likely.  Please continue to eat plenty of gluten until your endoscopy to be sure that any gluten-related damage can be seen.  Plus it gives you one last chance to enjoy your favorite gluten-containing foods. I hope the endoscopy/biopsies give you a definitive answer. 
    • TexasCeliacNewbie
      I do also have the bloating, gas, constipation, hair loss, an auto-splenectomy that no one can see any reason for and some elevated liver enzymes that don't seem to have a cause, I also have joint pain and some spinal compression fractures that have no explanation.  I am only 42 so haven't had a bone density test yet.  My calcium was normal, but my D was a little low.  They haven't checked for any other vitamin deficiencies yet.  My blood test for an autoimmue disorder was quite high but my Thyroid was all normal.
    • TexasCeliacNewbie
      Hi, I have been having a lot of back pain and gut issues for 8 weeks or so.  I saw the GI on Monday and my results just came in from the lab.  Some of these number are high and off the little chart from the lab.  I am reading this correctly that I most likely have Celiac, right???  It would explain a lot of things for me.  She does have me scheduled for a colonoscopy and endoscopy in  2 weeks to do the biopsy.  I posted this prior, but forgot to put the range assuming they were all the same.  Someone advised me to repost with the ranges for some insight in the meantime. Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 140 (normal) - Normal is 87-352 Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA 256 (High) - Moderate to strong positive at or above 30 Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG 65 (High) - Moderate to strong positive at or above 30 t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA 31 (High) - Moderate to strong positive above 10 t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG 10 (High) - Positive is at or above 10
    • trents
      Usually, the blood testing is done first and the endoscopy/biopsy follows for confirmation if there are positive antibody test scores. Historically, the endoscopy with biopsy has been considered to be the gold standard for diagnosing celiac disease. If the tTG-IGA scores are very high (5x-10x normal), some doctors will forego the endoscpoy/biopsy and grant a celiac disease diagnosis without it. So, if you are starting with the endoscopy/biopsy that may be all you need to arrive at a diagnosis. Another possibility would be for the GI doc to do a blood draw for antibody testing on the same day you come in for the endoscopy/biopsy.
    • AuntieAutoimmune
      Thanks,Scott. Yes, I had already seen those 
×
×
  • Create New...