Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Positive For Celiac, Do I Need Biopsy?

krysmaralie

Recommended Posts

krysmaralie Newbie
krysmaralie
Posted

Hi Everyone,

I have recently been tested positive for Celiac disease in a blood test. My GP said that I need to go for a biopsy 'to confirm'. The problem is that I am currently travelling and it will be months before I get to do a Biopsy. I want to go gluten-free now, but am concerned that I should wait (and continue to feel terrible) to have this biopsy. Is it possible to eat 'normal' for a few weeks leading up to the biopsy, in order to get a true reading?

All of the literature I have read say not to go on a gluten free diet until you have been tested - is the blood test sufficient?

Thanks very much for your thoughts.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

No confirmation necessary. You positive blood test is your diagnosis. I biopsy can indicate the level of damage or look for other issues.

Depending on the level of damage to your intestines it can influence your biopsy if you are on a gluten free diet. And, of course, depending on the length of time that you are on the gluten free diet.

Many people choose not to further test and began the diet immediately. It is your choice. There is no further testing that will be needed to "confirm". You have that confirmation.

aikiducky Apprentice
aikiducky
Posted

Just to give another point of view - I agree that for yourself, a positive blood test should be enough to go gluten free. But for "official" purposes it might not always be enough. For example, if you ever wanted to take part in a study, they usually look for biopsy-diagnosed people so you would be excluded. Or if you change doctors they might want to do the biopsy later to "prove" to themselves you have celiac for sure. Remember, once you go gluten free the idea is that you will stay gluten free for the rest of your life! Decisions you make now will possibly have an impact years from now. The one thing I worry myself about is - what if for some reason I'm incapacitated, my medical records don't show celiac, and I'm in a hospital or home of some sort and they keep feeding me gluten?

I wouldn't go gluten free now and then back on gluten before the biopsy in any case. One, that might result in a false negative biopsy. Two, many people find that after being gluten free they react more strongly to gluten than before that, so you might make yourself very sick that way. So I'd either go gluten free now and skip the biopsy, or have the biopsy but with the understanding that it is just looking for other potential problems. Or stay on gluten for a while longer, have the biopsy and then go gluten free immediately afterwards.

Actually, the very best case scenario I think would be that you do whatever it takes to get the biopsy done ASAP. But it's your decision and you should weight all the pros and cons carefully for yourself.

Pauliina

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
jayhawkmom
Posted

I have a bit of a different perspective.

My blood tests were questionable and inconclusive. I decided to have the biopsy. The biopsy was "negative" but I didn't know that before I went gluten free. By the time I got the biopsy results, I'd already been gluten free for a few weeks (it took forever!) and was feeling better than I'd felt in years.

However, with "inconclusive" blood work and a negative biopsy, I figured I'd be totally fine to eat gluten. Yet, after being gluten-free for a while, once I started eating it again.... I was sick(er) all over again.

So, I'm on a gluten free diet...and will remain on one. Gluten makes sick. No amount of testing or the results will change that fact.

If you already know that gluten makes you sick, and have the positive blood tests to confirm it, the biopsy doesn't seem all that necessary, in my opinion. If it were to come back negative, would you begin to consume gluten again? If you think you will.... I'd skip it.

(FWIW - my "allergist" said my results are inconclusive. My GI said that they were "conclusive enough" to warrant a biopsy, and that since my bt's were elevated, even without "confirmation" from the biopsy, I obviously have a gluten "problem" and should not consume.)

njbeachbum Explorer
njbeachbum
Posted

Just to give you insight based on what I just went through recently, I was informed of my blood test results just after Thanksgiving in 11/07. My doctor scheduled an endoscopy for 12/21 to confirm the findings, but told me to go ahead and get started with the gluten free diet. A lot of people on here will tell you NOT to go gluten free before the biopsy... and if you have not been symptomatic for very long and maybe do not have significant damage, then this could impact your biopsy results. I was misdiagnosed and symptomatic for many years, and my doctor indicated that it could take up to 6 months to a year on a gluten free diet for the damage to heal in the small intestine. Therefore, after only a few weeks gluten free (and I'd even say up to 2 months or so) my biopsy would still show damage and flattening of the villi.

It's really your call based on your particular situation. But as Lisa has stated above... you have your diagnosis in the blood test. There's really no need to wait. Get started with the diet and start feeling better soon.

Best of luck to you, and stay positive!!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

Changes to the villi, seen by biopsy, can occur within one week of starting the gluten free diet.

If you chose to have the endo/biopsy, remain gluten free until the procedure, in efforts to have the results as accurate as possible.

If you chose not to have the biopsy, you can start the diet.

Which blood tests were positive? There are a few, and some are more specific/sensitive than others.

krysmaralie Newbie
krysmaralie
Posted
  • Author

Thanks so much for everyone's help. My doctor actually did tell me to go gluten-free until I was able to get a biopsy. He said it could take 'months' to get an appointment, so I took that term literally. I will look into a little further, thanks again.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


osusanna Newbie
osusanna
Posted

I tested positive with the blood work through my rheumatologist who said I didn't need an endoscopy/biopsy (my symptoms were not the typical symptoms) and have been gluten-free for two years feeling pretty darn good too! I went last week to a GI doc for a bleeding problem probably unrelated and he said "you can't be sure you have celiac unless you have the biopsy" he wanted me to go back on gluten for a questionable length of time, unsupervised, and have the test. There is no way to be sure of the correct time to be on gluten for a positive result. I am in a horrible dilema trying to decide what is the right thing: poison myself for a chance at for sure diagnosis or live with the doubts of my present and future doctors.

If you can get the biopsy in a reasonable amount of time without being too miserable it will hopefully save you heartache later on.

Gemini Experienced
Gemini
Posted
I tested positive with the blood work through my rheumatologist who said I didn't need an endoscopy/biopsy (my symptoms were not the typical symptoms) and have been gluten-free for two years feeling pretty darn good too! I went last week to a GI doc for a bleeding problem probably unrelated and he said "you can't be sure you have celiac unless you have the biopsy" he wanted me to go back on gluten for a questionable length of time, unsupervised, and have the test. There is no way to be sure of the correct time to be on gluten for a positive result. I am in a horrible dilema trying to decide what is the right thing: poison myself for a chance at for sure diagnosis or live with the doubts of my present and future doctors.

If you can get the biopsy in a reasonable amount of time without being too miserable it will hopefully save you heartache later on.

Your rheumatologist had it right from the start....if you tested positive via blood work for celiac disease then an endoscopy is not necessary to confirm Celiac. The endoscopy may be warranted if there are other problems, like symptoms of bleeding, that need to be checked out but the GI doctor is dead wrong that you need an endo to "confirm" celiac disease. He is just trying to protect his interests....medicine is a business, after all, and all those fancy endoscopy wings need to be paid for. To ask a person to become very ill for an unspecified period of time to prove what the blood work has already told you is grounds for malpractice, in my opinion. If you also had a positive dietary response, along with the blood work, you have celiac disease.

Don't worry about what any future doctors think about blood work diagnosis. I made a remark to my primary care that it's not my problem that the medical community refuses to look at the whole picture when diagnosing a disease, and relys on one test only. After she saw how high my blood work was and all the autoimmune diseases I have as a result of a prolonged diagnosis, she does not doubt my diagnosis. I like to think I have taught her to be more flexible when it comes to helping people get a proper diagnosis for celiac disease, instead of telling them they don't have celiac disease because of a lack of an endoscopy picture. If they all suffered for years like I did, they would change their tune.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,864
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Brandie Anderson
    Newest Member
    Brandie Anderson
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Opinions on my test results/symptoms

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Villi damage is caused by celiac disease, which does not happen in NCGS, although some people with NCGS do have elevated antibody levels. Some people with NCGS who have the genes for celiac disease may end up developing celiac disease, so in some people NCGS may be a precursor to celiac disease, but more research needs to be done on NCGS. Both low iron and vitamin D are common symptoms of celiac disease. Also, regarding beer:  
    • Scott Adams
      Vaccines

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      It’s true that some vaccines contain small amounts of preservatives, stabilizers, or adjuvants to ensure their safety and effectiveness. For example: Thimerosal: A preservative that contains ethylmercury (not to be confused with methylmercury, which is toxic). Most routine vaccines no longer contain thimerosal, except for some flu vaccines in multi-dose vials. Aluminum: Used in very small amounts as an adjuvant to boost the immune response. The amount is far below levels considered harmful, but if you suspect an aluminum allergy, it’s worth discussing with your doctor. Sugar alcohols: These are sometimes used as stabilizers, but they are generally well-tolerated. If you have a known intolerance, you can ask about specific ingredients in each vaccine. Since you mentioned an intolerance to metals and jewelry, it’s a good idea to follow up with allergy testing, as you planned. This can help identify specific metals (e.g., nickel, aluminum) to avoid. Your doctor can then guide you on whether any vaccine ingredients might be a concern. Since the Mayo Clinic has already identified potential allergies, it might be helpful to consult an allergist or immunologist. They can review your medical history, perform tests, and provide personalized advice on vaccines and their ingredients. While it’s important to address your intolerances, it’s also worth considering the risks of not being vaccinated. Many vaccine-preventable diseases can have serious consequences, especially for those with underlying health conditions. 
    • knitty kitty
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @Manaan2, I was on Miralax for several months after I crushed three vertebrae and fractured my hip.  The compression fractures of my vertebrae affected the Vagus nerve that stimulates digestion and intestinal movement, peristalsis. Miralax just didn't relieve the constipation I was experiencing at all.  Nothing budged.  I tried Milk of Magnesia (magnesium oxide) which pulls water into the digestive tract, and found that rather harsh and dehydrating.   Bad idea. I was already taking thiamine in various forms, Benfotiamine, TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl  disulfude), Lipothiamine and Allithiamine.  Click on my name, then Activities in the pull down menu to get to my blog to learn more about my journey with thiamine.   Since we need more thiamine when we are physically ill and emotionally stressed, I decided to focus on TTFD,  Benfotiamine, and magnesium l-threonate.  Within a week of increasing my doses a bit, my constipation was gone.  It took several more months to heal the compressed nerve damage.  For pain, I take a combination of TTFD, Pyridoxine B 6, and  Cobalamine B12 which together have an analgesic effect.  I can't function with pharmaceutical pain killers, besides they cause constipation.   Mechanisms of action of vitamin B1 (thiamine), B6 (pyridoxine), and B12 (cobalamin) in pain: a narrative review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35156556/ Yes, I did just stop the Miralax, but I wasn't on it as long as your daughter.  Yes, there's a difference between adults and children.  Yes, my circumstances were different than your daughter's, but thiamine deficiency does affect the nerves and the brain.  A twenty percent increase in dietary thiamine causes an eighty percent increase in brain function (which activates the Vagus nerve and controls digestion).   I recommend you visit Dr. Chandler Marrs' website, hormonesmatter.com.  Dr. Marrs worked with Dr. Derrick Longsdale, a pioneer in thiamine research, specifically with children and autism spectrum disorders.  She has been very helpful to me when I reached out to her.  She would be better able to guide you about your daughter's care. https://hormonesmatter.com/sibo-ibs-constipation-thiamine-deficiency/#google_vignette Do stay in touch, please.  You can start another thread or personal message me any time.  My heart goes out to you, your husband, and especially your daughter.   Namaste
    • Manaan2
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By Manaan2 · Posted

      @knitty kitty  The information you've provided is invaluable!  I have a lot more homework to do before we make the official switch but you have significantly increased my hope that we can get her off Miralax (she started at 3 years old and is almost 8!).  This weekend my husband and I plan to solidify all the details for a start point, then adjust as we go along.  I realize that everyone's body is different, then there's also the fact that she's a child but just out of curiosity if you don't mind sharing and if you'd rather not, no problem at all-how long did you take Miralax before switching and when you switched, did you just completely stop the Miralax or was there a period where you did Miralax and the supplements?  I plan to research that piece this weekend but just curious what you did.  
    • BIg Nodge
      Opinions on my test results/symptoms

      By BIg Nodge · Posted

      Scott, thanks so much for the thoughtful replies. My doctor did actually just re-order thyroid labs to see what is going on with my TPOs. I agree that will be interesting information.  I think I know the answer to this, but as far as the biopsy . . .. that would be quite conclusive as far as celiac goes, but a negative result would not rule out NCGS, correct? Does NCGS also cause damage to the lower intestine/leaky gut?  I appreciate the thought that I should be open-minded to other causes. I did not have dysautonomia on my radar, so I will look into that. From a quick scan at the potential symptoms it seems like almost anyone could convince themselves they have it, very broad! I can see why that is a tricky one to diagnose. I did also show low vitamin D, I'm in New England so that is somewhat common. I have a memory of low iron on some lab result as well but I can't find it, so I'll look into that. My cholesterol is high too, so working on that.  While the initial adjustment was tough, I have actually adapted fairly well to going gluten-free at home. The tough part for me is I love eating out and traveling, so that has been a challenge. I suppose if the answer ends up being NCGS then I could maintain a mostly gluten-free diet but also experiment with the occasional splurges. Snowboarding just doesn't feel right without a beer in the lodge . . ... cider is just not the same!  Thanks again.  
×
×
  • Create New...