Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Refractory Coeliac Disease?


covsooze

Recommended Posts

covsooze Enthusiast

I had a bit of a shock yesterday. I went for my yearly check up with the gastroenterologist, and he told me he wanted to do further tests to see if my coeliacs is refractory :o

I was diagnosed Jan 06, following ttg blood tests that were way off the scale and endoscopy showing total villous atrophy. I was 33 at the time and believe the condition was active for many years before I finally got the diagnosis.

As my sister was diagnosed before me, I have always known the importance of not cheating, and the possibility of cc via utensils etc I am very strict about my diet - which is largely unprocessed - and about personal care products. I rarely eat out due to being paranoid about being glutened.

Despite all this, my follow up endoscopy at 9 months continued to show damage (although not as severe) and my antibodies continue to be raised (although nowhere near as high). I do have symptoms, but these could be attributable to dairy and the GI is going to test for that.

I am not losing weight, but that's only because I eat ridiculous amounts of food lol :rolleyes: I am borderline underweight despite having an underactive thyroid (which is still symptomatic).

The dr is going to check to see if I have pancreatic insufficiency, which could explain my inability to absorb food properly, but he's worried about my antibodies given that I am strict with being gluten-free. I will be having a further endoscopy to check for refractory sprue.

Now it could be that I'm reacting to minute amounts of gluten by cc from DS (who's 4). But the GI was nevertheless worried about my antibodies.

I've been researching on the web, but what I'm not clear about is this: in refractory cases, do antibodies remain elevated, or is it 'just' the damage that remains?

Thanks to anyone who can shed some light on this :)

Susie


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Hi Susie, this is my opinion:

You had severe damage when diagnosed with sky high antibody numbers. After nine months the damage to your villi has lessened, your symptoms are mostly resolved, and your numbers are coming down.

In refractory sprue your antibody numbers go down to normal, while the villi will stay completely flat. Plus, the diarrhea won't let up at all, to the point were often you end up needing to wear diapers because you can't control your bowel movements.

Your damage and numbers are down from what they were. You are healing, slowly but surely. It can take one to five years in adults who had severe damage to completely heal, and in people who were diagnosed later in life, usually some damage remains.

What are your remaining symptoms?

Personally, I think you may need to eliminate other foods besides gluten, especially dairy and soy. Both of those are known to also cause villi damage, and might make it impossible for your intestines to heal. And the symptoms from dairy and soy intolerance are very similar to celiac disease symptoms.

Lisa Mentor

Hey Susie,

I am sorry that you are having ongoing issues. I like Ursa's response and it very may be the answer. I do wish you a simple solution toward good health.

Darn210 Enthusiast

Susie,

Here is an article posted on celiac.com

https://www.celiac.com/articles/710/1/Refra...gram/Page1.html

You may have already read this, however, there is a paragraph that implies that the antibody count must show compliance to the diet. If your antibody count is still high, I don't think you can make the jump to refractory sprue yet.

The article mentioned a test for determining "slow responding" celiac disease versus refractory celiac disease. It also listed many conditions that must be investigated/eliminated before a diagnosis can be made. . . one of which is an intolerance to additional foods.

I'm sure this is scary. Hugs and Prayers.

covsooze Enthusiast

Thanks for your replies - they confirmed what I was thinking :)

Ursa, I agree with what you said about it taking some people a long time to receover, but I shouldn't still have elevated antibodies should I? that does mean I must still be getting gluten some how, doesn't it?

I know I must have problems with other foods. Dairy should be fairly easy to eliminate, but it's when I get onto things like grains and potatoes (all of which I suspect to one degree or other) that I have problems, because when i've tried to do an elimination diet a couple of times previously, despite still eating lots, I lose weight very quickly (which I definitely don't need to do) and get depressed coz I'm not getting the calories I need. I wonder about trying to exclude one food group at a time? I know it's not ideal, but maybe more constructive. I'd appreciate your thoughts Ursa, as I know you've struggled a lot with various foods.

Thanks :)

Susie

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,989
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Cappynan
    Newest Member
    Cappynan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...