Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Bloods But Negative Biopsy?

deviation

Recommended Posts

deviation Newbie
deviation
Posted

Hi all,

I'm new round here and have a quick question. (Apologies if it has been answered before). I've got positive blood test results for celiac, but am awaiting the results of my biopsy and of course all sorts of scenarios are running through my head. I'm wondering - in the case that my biopsy doesn't show celiac - why would someone test positive to celiac in blood results and it now show up through the biopsy? Would it mean, perhaps, gluten intolerance instead of celiac?

Many thanks in advance! :-)

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest j_mommy
Guest j_mommy
Posted

It would still mean you have celiac. If teh antibodies are in your blood you have celiac.

If the biopsy is Neg, it could be that they missed an area affected. This happens if they don't take enough samples.

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

These are the test for the Serologic Panel for Celiac:

Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) both IgA and IgG

Anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) - IgA

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) - IgA

Total IgA level.

If these are in the positive range, you do have Celiac. A biopsy can be hit and miss as to where the samples are taken. A biopsy can confirm celiac, but it cannot rule it out. And, or course, and endoscopy exam can look for other issues.

deviation Newbie
deviation
Posted
  • Author

Thanks momma-goose and j_mommy for the very quick replies. I don't have a copy of the results with me anymore but the total IgA level was just in the positive range. I guess I'm just afraid that if I go to the GP later this week and they say everything looks normal with the biopsy I'll just be sent home. I know shouldn't be catastrophising it before it happens (but that's part of my nature, LOL) but the wait for the results is so awful.

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
Thanks momma-goose and j_mommy for the very quick replies. I don't have a copy of the results with me anymore but the total IgA level was just in the positive range. I guess I'm just afraid that if I go to the GP later this week and they say everything looks normal with the biopsy I'll just be sent home. I know shouldn't be catastrophising it before it happens (but that's part of my nature, LOL) but the wait for the results is so awful.

Well, sure they will send you home. There is nothing they can do for you other than recommend the gluten free diet. I think you know you have your answer.

Stop worrying and start reading up on the gluten free diet. And, welcome to the club! ;)

deviation Newbie
deviation
Posted
  • Author
Well, sure they will send you home. There is nothing they can do for you other than recommend the gluten free diet. I think you know you have your answer.

Stop worrying and start reading up on the gluten free diet. And, welcome to the club! ;)

Very, very good advice MG, thanks! I am so glad I found this community. Thanks again for your responses - I am feeling a bit calmer about it all now :-)

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
jayhawkmom
Posted
but the total IgA level was just in the positive range. I guess I'm just afraid that if I go to the GP later this week and they say everything looks normal with the biopsy I'll just be sent home. I know shouldn't be catastrophising it before it happens (but that's part of my nature, LOL) but the wait for the results is so awful.

I'm pretty sure that the Total IgA is just run to make sure there isn't selective IgA deficiency... and that there really isn't a "positive or negative" range for TOTAL IgA. There is a "normal" range, but outside of it doesn't make it positive or negative, it means it deficient or "not." Right??

Or, am I mistaken...and it's a positive tTg IgA?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


deviation Newbie
deviation
Posted
  • Author
I'm pretty sure that the Total IgA is just run to make sure there isn't selective IgA deficiency... and that there really isn't a "positive or negative" range for TOTAL IgA. There is a "normal" range, but outside of it doesn't make it positive or negative, it means it deficient or "not." Right??

Or, am I mistaken...and it's a positive tTg IgA?

I'm a complete newbie at this, but I think what I meant was that my total IgA was just above the normal range. Not that I know what that means anyway! :-) Aaah the learning curve of a (possible) new condition!

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

Open Original Shared Link

Here is some information from our achieves. I am not great at interpreting testing so perhaps this may help you determine where you are. But I do know that something is cooking.

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
jayhawkmom
Posted

That link confuses me even more... but also says the same thing, there really is no explanation for "over the limits" Total Serum IgA. My son had a similar issue. TOTAL IgA was "over the normal limits" but all other results (AGA's, tTg Ab's, EMA) were all within range. I was told it was just a "fluke." And, there was no further offer of explanation.

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
That link confuses me even more... but also says the same thing, there really is no explanation for "over the limits" Total Serum IgA. My son had a similar issue. TOTAL IgA was "over the normal limits" but all other results (AGA's, tTg Ab's, EMA) were all within range. I was told it was just a "fluke." And, there was no further offer of explanation.

Laura (happygirl) would know. I'll see if I can knock on her door and see if she's home.

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
jayhawkmom
Posted

Thank you! I'm really not trying to argue or debate, I'm really just trying to understand. Thus far, no one has been able to give me any reason why my kiddo's IgA levels were so wonky. Though, one person told me that it's associated with diabetes, and that scared the bejeepers out of me.

deviation, I hope that we are able to help you out.... I really am not trying to "rat hole" your thread. I'm just trying to understand, as I know you are... too! =)

deviation Newbie
deviation
Posted
  • Author
deviation, I hope that we are able to help you out.... I really am not trying to "rat hole" your thread. I'm just trying to understand, as I know you are... too! =)

No, that is totally fine... 'rat hole' away!!! :-) This discussion is really helping me! And thanks for that link to the archives, momma goose, will have a look at that a bit later.

nikky Contributor
nikky
Posted

if your biopsy is clear - dont be disheartened

it hapened to me, but my bloods were so high that my consultant decided to start me on the new diet in december

the normal range is 1-10, my bloods over 200, and the biopsy was still clear

i think it would depend on your range if it was only 5-10 over the 'limit' then and your biopsy was clear then they would probably just monitor you

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
jayhawkmom
Posted
the normal range is 1-10, my bloods over 200, and the biopsy was still clear

That depends on the lab... and total serum IgA doesn't typically have a range of 1-10 - it's significantly higher than that. In fact, for the lab we went through, their reference range for total serum IgA was 40 - 400. Anything within that range was considered normal. (again... that's for TOTAL SERUM IgA - nothing else) Mine was 331.

However, the other references ranges varied according to individual test.

Editing to add.... Total Serum IgA is also age based in some labs. The normal reference ranges for a 10 year old are significantly different than the reference ranges for a 30 year old, for example.

nikky Contributor
nikky
Posted
That depends on the lab... and total serum IgA doesn't typically have a range of 1-10 - it's significantly higher than that. In fact, for the lab we went through, their reference range for total serum IgA was 40 - 400. Anything within that range was considered normal. (again... that's for TOTAL SERUM IgA - nothing else) Mine was 331.

i was going by the UK NHS ranges, i didnt realise that it varies with age either

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
jayhawkmom
Posted

Perhaps since you are in the UK - there is a true "standard" that is THE standard with regards to Celiac testing???

In the US - there simply isn't one. Each lab has their own set of positive and negative criteria. Which, incidentally, could cause one lab to say someone's results are TOTALLY negative, where the same blood, at a different lab, might be thought to be extremely positive.

Wow, I wish there was a "standard" standard here in the US!!!!

With regards to the IGA, the optimal "level" isn't reached until after puberty - a small child automatically makes MUCH less IgA than a full grown adult. So, there are ranges established to compensate for age. Even still, children who are often deficient simply aren't old enough to produce (or have) optimal levels. But, not having enough - regardless of age - can render the other tests invalid.

I apologize if I'm not making much sense. I've had far too much chocolate today and I'm suffering from a sugar buzz. LOL!

nikky Contributor
nikky
Posted

ok, i feel sorry for people living in the U.S then

sorry for any confusion i caused, i was just going on what my GI told me

jayhawkmom Enthusiast
jayhawkmom
Posted
ok, i feel sorry for people living in the U.S then

sorry for any confusion i caused, i was just going on what my GI told me

It's ok!! And, yes... those of us, in the US, who are lucky enough to have a competent doctor on our sides also feel very sad and sorry for those who aren't able to find one! In the US, they are still fairly few and far between. =(

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,810
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Becky103
    Newest Member
    Becky103
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.4k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AuntieAutoimmune
      Royal Caribbean Only, Please

      By AuntieAutoimmune · Posted

      Great tips, Deb. Thanks.  What a pity that they no longer mark items as gluten-free. And it is even more of a shame that you must bring protein bars instead of the crew helping you with your needs. Are you planning on sailing Royal again? 
    • Scott Adams
      Hidden Gluten in distilled vinegar

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I've not heard of any issues with Primal Kitchen, but it certainly would be worth not using the brand for a while to see if this helps. Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal. This article may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      Can I trust the gluten free label if a product was made in a facility that also processes gluten?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      If you are super sensitive you may want to look for only Certified Gluten-Free Products, as @trents mentioned.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free/ non dairy , low calorie pudding

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'm not sure about low calorie, as puddings are typically a dessert, but we do have this category: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/gluten-free-recipes/gluten-free-dessert-recipes-pastries-cakes-cookies-etc/gluten-free-pudding-recipes/ This one might work if you cut back on the sugar:    
    • DebJ14
      Royal Caribbean Only, Please

      By DebJ14 · Posted

      We are off next week on our 9th RCCL cruise since our diagnoses.  I send an email to special_needs@rccl.com before every cruise letting them know that I am both dairy and gluten free and my husband is gluten free.   Unfortunately, with the new menus they introduced in 2023, they removed the gluten-free designation from each item on the menu.  Instead of having a dedicated person take gluten-free orders, it now falls to your regular wait staff.  Some have been great and some not so good.  We had a great cruise in May and hit it off with our head waiter.  She went the extra mile and ordered gluten free desserts that were not on the menu.  My problem arises from other food allergies.  I am allergic to dairy, beef, and several types of fish.  On those days my husband is a happy camper with a steak or salmon, veggies and a baked potato.  I end up not getting enough protein, so I bring protein bars.  I also bring snacks for the room. As long as the food is commercially prepared and unopened, you can bring it. Often the only dessert choices that are gluten free contain dairy, so I am out of luck.  But, if you are just gluten free, they have plenty of choices.  See the head chef in the Windjammer buffet and he will give you a tour of the gluten-free choices.  They usually have 2 gluten free desserts out at lunch and they are labeled gluten free. We have found that it works best to have assigned dining rather than anytime.  That way the waiters learn from the get go what our needs are, and we don't have to explain ourselves every night.  We also get a private table for 2.  I frankly got sick and tired of tablemates telling me a little bit of gluten would not hurt me.
×
×
  • Create New...