Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Using Sweet Rice Flour


cycler

Recommended Posts

cycler Contributor

I finally was able to get Sweet Rice Flour. I've been using Brown Rice flour which is grainy so I'm hoping that the Sweet Rice Flour won't be as bad.

My question is - I've been using it in the 6 -2 -1 (flour, corn starch, tapioca flour) mix and I was wondering if I needed to adjust that for the Sweet Rice Flour.

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cruelshoes Enthusiast

I'm don't think you will get the same results if you try to sub the sweet rice flour for brown rice flour (even if the measure is adjusted). See below:

Open Original Shared Link

sweet rice flour Glutinous waxy rice, containing more starch than the brown and white rice flours. Excellent thickener; binds and reduces separation in sauces that are to be frozen and then reheated. (Cannot substitute for brown or white rice flours.)

I think you might be better off trying to find a less-gritty version of the brown rice flour. What brand are you currently using?

RiceGuy Collaborator

I never use rice flours at all. Not since I tried millet, sorghum, buckwheat, etc. No graininess, better taste, better texture.

The sweet rice flours do differ from brand to brand. Not all work the same. That is, some tend to make things more gummy than others. It would probably work best in place of other very starchy ones like tapioca, potato starch, corn starch, etc. Personal preferences differ of course. I actually don't use sweet rice flour anymore either.

Darn210 Enthusiast

I've used two different brands of sweet rice flour and both made things more doughy or gummy. I wouldn't use them as a direct replacement for brown rice or white rice flour. I don't even like to have it in my bread recipe. I do use a little in my cookie recipes though. If you want a finer ground white rice flour, buy it at an Asian Market. Not only is it a finer ground, it is also a cheaper price than what you would get at a Wild Oats/Whole Foods type store. You can also get Authentic Foods superfine ground brown rice flour but it is EXPENSIVE . . . but I do love it.

Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Well that explains some things about my pancakes and cookies. What recipes do you use for pancakes or cookies if you don't use rice flour? Or what ratios of flours are you using? I'm fairly new to this and am figuring out what each flour is and such. I do have buckwheat and sorghum and millet but haven't tried them yet. I used a Pamela's substitute mix from here and it was good but it had that gritty aftertaste. I'm making up pancake mix/sugar cookie mix tonight and would like to try a different recipe for the flour before we all deide which is the best for us. Any thoughts?

Thanks

Stacie

RiceGuy Collaborator

Well, I'm not a big fan of pancakes, but I did try a recipe recently, just to see how they'd turn out. It was mostly buckwheat, and I think I added a little soy to it. My next attempt will likely be equal parts buckwheat, millet, and fava.

For sugar cookies, since it's like half sugar as I recall (I don't eat sugar), I imagine millet by itself would probably work. Maybe buckwheat if you like a softer cookie and stronger taste. It just depends on how you like your cookies.

Incidentally, I've read coconut flour is great for baking, in particular for cakes and muffins and such.

In short, experiment! Just do it in small batches so you won't have to eat a lot of something icky if it flops :lol::P

JNBunnie1 Community Regular

What I have found is that the more different flours you use in one recipe, the better the product will be. I don't like the taste of anything made with just amaranth, millet, or buckwheat flour, but when blended properly, it gives a lovely flavor. Sorghum is the best tasting flour to me. I find millet goes well with stronger flavors, like pumpkin breads or anything spiced. I prefer amaranth as 1/6th of any recipe. I usually take any normal recipe that calls for the 6:2:1 with rice, potato and tapioca, and replace the rice with one half sorghum and one half whatever else catches my fancy. I find the starches to be pretty interchangeable, I like arrowroot because it doesn't add any flavor. But I also like potato starch because I like the flavor it adds to some things. I would say that if something calls for tapioca starch, it's best to use that if possible. Tapioca has very good stickiness, helps hold things together.

Also, a lot of gluten free flours will give you that starchy feeling. When possible, I mix up the whole recipe and then just leave it for at least 20 min. Especially pancake batter. I never get that gritty feeling. It's like the flour needs to soak or something. I've never had naything fall down, but I seem to have good baking karma. There's someone on the board who has a hex on their quick breads, so be careful.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Darn210 Enthusiast
There's someone on the board who has a hex on their quick breads, so be careful.

:lol::lol::lol:

Why that's RiceGuy!!!!! . . . so maybe we shouldn't listen to his advice . . . :lol::lol::lol:

Just kidding . . . he was having problems with his baking powder.

Just goes to show, it's all just one big experiment. You got to figure out what works and tastes best to you. And unfortunately, that mean's trial and error. I don't know of anybody who got it right the first time. And by right, I don't mean it was a flop, I mean that they just started tweaking it from there.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,131
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Itsabit
    Newest Member
    Itsabit
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Keep us posted and let us know the results of the biopsy. Your case is atypical in a way in that you have this high DGP-IGA but normal TTG-IGA so knowing how it turns out will give us more data for similar situations that may be posted in the future. 
    • Skg414228
      Fair enough! I very easily could have misread somewhere. Celiac is very confusing lol but I should know in a little over a month what the final verdict is. Just thought chatting with people smarter than myself would get me in the right mindset. I just thought that DGP IGA was pretty high compared to some stuff I had seen and figured someone on here would be more willing to say it is more than likely celiac instead of my doctor who is trying to be less direct. She did finally say she believes it is celiac but wanted to confirm with the biopsy. I did figure it wouldn't hurt seeing what other people said too just because not all doctors are the best. I think mine is actually pretty good from what I have seen but I don't know what I don't know lol. Sorry lot of rambling here just trying to get every thought out. Thanks again!
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
×
×
  • Create New...