Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Protein Destruction


greendog

Recommended Posts

greendog Apprentice

Does anyone know if the Gluten Protein can exist in a vaporized state. I have read and heard that if the substance gluten is in is heated to a temperature where it vaporizes that when it turns back to liquid the protein is gone. I have also read that if a thin crust pizza is baked long enough in a true pizza oven that is like > 500 degrees that the gluten protein is destroyed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Well, simply put, no. Temps above 500 would render a burnt pizza and a smoky kitchen. The "vaporized" gluten, along with every other organic substance in the pizza is turned into carbon dioxide as it burns. So, no more gluten and no more pizza.

p.s. recondensing the pizza, less the gluten, into a liquid isn't an option.

tom Contributor
I have also read that if a thin crust pizza is baked long enough in a true pizza oven that is like > 500 degrees that the gluten protein is destroyed.

I'd like to know where you read that, as they need to be educated.

It's false.

Also, our problem w/ gluten is really w/ a protein fraction inside a gluten molecule. In wheat it's called gliadin.

tarnalberry Community Regular

the 33-mer (chain of 33 amino acids that makes up a section of the whole protein molecule of gliadin) that we react to is *very* durable. tests have shown that it withstands heat over 600 degrees. you can't 'cook' it out.

Guest Happynwgal2
Does anyone know if the Gluten Protein can exist in a vaporized state. I have read and heard that if the substance gluten is in is heated to a temperature where it vaporizes that when it turns back to liquid the protein is gone. I have also read that if a thin crust pizza is baked long enough in a true pizza oven that is like > 500 degrees that the gluten protein is destroyed.

A lot of good answers to this already - had this been true, we all would have run to out ovens and baked the gluten to death, while the rest of the food that it was in, would still be yummy and eatable...

A lot of people just don't realize what gluten is in the first place and there is a lot of misinformation out there.

greendog Apprentice
I'd like to know where you read that, as they need to be educated.

It's false.

Also, our problem w/ gluten is really w/ a protein fraction inside a gluten molecule. In wheat it's called gliadin.

I've been on this gluten kick for about 15 of my adult years so I know about the gliadin. How about if the gliadin is in something like alcohol which can be vaporized.

greendog Apprentice
Well, simply put, no. Temps above 500 would render a burnt pizza and a smoky kitchen. The "vaporized" gluten, along with every other organic substance in the pizza is turned into carbon dioxide as it burns. So, no more gluten and no more pizza.

p.s. recondensing the pizza, less the gluten, into a liquid isn't an option.

Well MommaGoose I was actually talking about 2 different situations. One being the pizza in the oven and one being gliadin in a liquid state. When I mentioned vaporized I was actually referring to the gliadin in the liquid state (like alcohol). And in my old moonshining days I think we were able to vaporize some of that liquid. At least before we drank it or it blew up the still. :P


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

It is generally accepted that the distillation process used in making spirit alcohol and distilled vinegar produces a gluten-free product.

This is true not because the gluten is destroyed, but because it does not pass into the vapor. This does not say that gluten cannot be vaporized, but that these processes involve carefully controlled temperatures that are not nearly high enough for that to happen.

greendog Apprentice
It is generally accepted that the distillation process used in making spirit alcohol and distilled vinegar produces a gluten-free product.

This is true not because the gluten is destroyed, but because it does not pass into the vapor. This does not say that gluten cannot be vaporized, but that these processes involve carefully controlled temperatures that are not nearly high enough for that to happen.

Thank you, this is helpful. Do you know of any processing for like Lite Beers that would remove some of the gliadin? I'm sort of an anomoly in that I can't eat a few crumbs of gluten in a breadlike state without having harsh side effects, but can drink some Lite Beers with little or no side effects.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,994
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nicola McGuire
    Newest Member
    Nicola McGuire
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...