Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Are Blood Tests Always Accurate For Celiac ?


Sharon Marie

Recommended Posts

Sharon Marie Apprentice

I have a granddaughter and a great grandson that had negitive results in their blood tests for celiac. She suffers so from eczema ( think more likely Dermatitis Herpetiformis ). And he is having behavioral problems.

I know one symptom in children is ADHD. He is so skinny and hyper. Very sensitive and loveing when he is in control of himself.

I have celiac and I know it is inherited.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Hi, and welcome to these boards.

I don't know how old those kids are. But those blood tests are notoriously unreliable in children under six, and are almost useless for babies and toddlers unless they are at death's door.

And in older kids and adults those tests are somewhat more reliable, but still far from perfect. A negative test can absolutely NEVER rule out celiac disease (and that goes for the biopsy as well).

My oldest grandson (now 5 1/2) looked like one of those starving third world children, just skin and bones until he was four years old. He was hyper, extremely emotional (crying for hours over little things, being inconsolable, and as a result treated like he was a wimp), and wanted to eat all day long. He would cry when my daughter would tell him that lunch (supper) was over and he wouldn't get any more until the next meal.

Finally last year she saw the light and put herself and her five kids on the gluten-free diet. What a difference! Little Ethan stopped being so emotional within days, and immediately started putting on weight. He is a very normal little kid now. Still slim, but not skin and bones. He is heavy! Before it would frighten me how light he was when I picked him up.

Eczema could be caused by dairy, gluten, nightshades, corn, eggs or other intolerances. If you think that your granddaughter's eczema is DH, you may be right, as you probably know what it looks like.

In her case, having a skin biopsy (taken BESIDE an active blister, my idiot dermatologist took mine right in the middle of the rash and then told me I definitely didn't have DH) would be a good idea. If it comes back positive, she would have an official celiac disease diagnosis. If it is negative, I would try the gluten-free diet anyway, was gluten can cause psoriasis and eczema as well as DH.

Maybe you could convince the parents to just try the gluten-free diet anyway? And if not, maybe they would be receptive to testing with Open Original Shared Link, which is much more sensitive than a blood test.

itchygirl Newbie

I'm totally with Ursa Major because I had to have three biopsies before they got it right. The derm has to know what they are doing, and the lab has to know how to read it.

gfp Enthusiast
my idiot dermatologist took mine right in the middle of the rash and then told me I definitely didn't have DH)

This just illustrates how unreliable testing can be when the people taking the tests don't know what they are doing.

The same goes for blood tests and biopsy and tsting children in general.

Its not a black and white test even if sampled correctly. Its about levels above 'normal'.

Many things can influence the tests ... and like any other of this type is someone with a result of 19.5 sicker than someone with 20.5 if the 'normal high range is 20. Perhaps the same two people sampled a day later would have reversed results. Is one positive and the other negative?

Secondly, if you stick to the diet then the numbers SHOULD go down. This doesn't mean you are cured.. it means its under control ...

By the time many of us actually get a test ... we have already tried everything, celiac disease is like that! Its the last thing the Dr. tests for in many cases and many of us already noticed we feel bad eating wheat so we either cut it out or reduced it ourselves.

When you add to this the random element of how experienced the person taking the sample or blood is and lack of advice that we must eat gluten for a period before testing then it really adds a random element.

So its worth repeating Ursa

A negative test can absolutely NEVER rule out celiac disease
AllieB Newbie

My blood work was defintively negative. Finally after two years on a gluten-free diet, they did a biopsy and found celiac related damage, even after two years gluten-free. My son has negative blood work, when he is 100% gluten free, he stops complaining about stomach aches and he doesn't act like he has a hole in his stomach. My niece has negative blood work, and at nearly five she is the size of an average 2 year old. Is it celiac? I don't think my sons will die if they are on a gluten diet, but I don't think it's doing them any good either.

Sharon Marie Apprentice

Thanks for the output I will pass it along to my Grand daughter.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,985
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sparks889395
    Newest Member
    Sparks889395
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
    • WildFlower1
      Sorry to put it clearly, at 15, infertility started (tried to word it nicely) meaning menstruation stopped. Which is in correlation to celiac I mean. Thank you. 
×
×
  • Create New...