Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Baby's Biopsy Back


Worriedtodeath

Recommended Posts

Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Finally got the biopsy report in today. it has little info and makes me wonder if they didn't do everything I have heard needs to be done on little ones in the early stages of Celiac disease. She was 19 months 9 days and had been on wheat 96 days. DOes anyone out there know??

Here's the report:

sample a -esophagus - five gray tissues - alcian blue/pas stain ordered sections show strips and fragments of benign epithelium with orderly maturation. Active inflammation and ulceration are not seen. Dysplastic and neoplastic changers are not seen. INcreased intraepithelial eosinophils are not seen. Glandular elements, including goblet cells are not seen. deeper section with an alcianblue/pas stain at ph 2.5 does not demonstrate acid mucin of inetstinal metaplasia or fungal organisms.

sample b - antrum - 3 tan tissues H pylori stain ordered - Sections show fragments of benign gastric mucosa containing a few lymphocytes and plasma cells within the lamina propria. Active inflammation and ulceration are not seen. Dysplastic and neoplastic changes not seen. A deeper section with a warthin starry stain does not demonstrate Helicobacter organisms.

Sample c - Duodenum 6 tan tissues -sections show fragments of benign duodenal mucosa without evidence of villous blunting or crypt hyperplasia. the vili to crypt ratio is 4:1 with scattered lymphocytes and plasma cells within the lamina propria. Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes are not seen.. Active inflammation and ulceration is not seen. Dysplastic and neoplastic changes are not seen. Brunner's glands are present.

I thought there should be numbers of IELs and Iels staining performed to determine the actual number.

Her disaccharidase test shows

lactase 7.6 range 24.5 +>- 8.0 abnormal <15.00

sucrase 35.6 range 54.4 +>- 25.4 abnormal < 25.00

maltase 138.5 range 160.8 +>- 62.8 abnormal < 100.00

palatinase 5.1 range 11.1 +>- 6.5 abnormal < 5.0

Thanks

Stacie


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Forgot to add the labs were done at the local hospital lab instead of being sent out to a specialist and the disaccharidase was sent to Quest diagnostics nichols institute

ravenwoodglass Mentor

You say she was on wheat for 96 days, was she gluten free before that? If so how did she react to the diet? Did you see symptoms come back on her 96 day challenge? The symptoms would not always be just GI symptoms, how is her mood, sleep, etc is also important. How she reacts when you add gluten back in is the most telling and that is more diagnsotic than the tests on little ones.

Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Everything went bad on gluten and everything has improved off it. DIet wise it is a positive for Celiac. It's just the gi is adamant that Celiac is not her problem because the bippsy was neg and he wants us to try various gluten grains until we find one that doesn't upset her tummy. :o We are going to the ped to review everything since the gi won't even do a followup since her problem is not a "gi" problem just food intolerances. Hubby is more of the mindset to get her well and back to the right growth curve and then reintroudce stuff and see what happens. I'm more of declaring her Celiac and running with it.

I was just wondering if the pathologist had even run all the approiate biopsy test to determine early Celiac signs instead of severe damage. IF not, I'm sure the ped will be glad to try to get the samples if there any left sent elsewhere for a better reading from more expierenced and knowledgable paths.

Stacie

ravenwoodglass Mentor

It sounds like he is recognizing that she has an intolerance but that it is not full blown celiac, yet. I would tend to side with you and want to prevent her from developing full blown celiac. She has had a negative effect from adding it back in and that in itself is telling you her body doesn't want it. It has to be so hard on you to have made her sick for 3 months and still not really have an answer from the GI doctor. I am sorry you had to go through this. You may want to follow the diet until she is old enough to tell you when something hurts. This will also give her time to gain some ground with growth and you can always challenge later. When you do challenge later I would do it when DH has a vacation so he can clearly see the mood effects when they occur. Many little ones do a Jekell and Hyde on gluten, heck lots of us adults do to for that matter.

I wish you the best and hope she is gaining ground soon and feeling better.

Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

She's doing great. SHe's up a couple of pounds and has at last outgrown all the 12 month clothes and certain types of 18 month clothes. I think she has grown about 1 1/2 inches since starting Gluten-free Casein-free. Compared to where she should be she's only 6 lbs under weight and about 3 inches below height. Her moods are great and she is just a delight. Because she put Mr. Hide to shame with her behaviour. THe ped said she will be content if she will grow to her height curve and not fall any further on the weight. She doesn't expect her to gain her weight back to "normal" given the diet is typically low carb and we are careful about adding in gluten-free grains more than a couple of times a week right now. And she is so active right now that gaining weight is much harder than maintaining it.

Funny you should mention full blown celiac. THat's the term the gi used when informing us that if she continued having problems we could rescope and retest and see if she had developed "full BLown" Celiac in a year or so. Like being a little pregnant. We've been working toward some type of dx since Jan and finally realized he isn't going to give us one and now realize the pathologist may not have done the right stuff or even looked at all the samples. THat sucks.

Just sounds stupid to not prevent a disease if you know you could.

Stacie

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,995
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Desiree Sweeney
    Newest Member
    Desiree Sweeney
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @WildFlower1, Here's an article that explains about the updated gluten challenge guidelines.  Be sure to read the comments below the article. Have you been checked for nutritional deficiencies?  Low iron can affect antibody production, causing false negatives on antibody testing.  Do you currently struggle with low iron?   Low Vitamin D can cause amenorrhea, cessation of menstrual periods.   Correcting nutritional deficiencies is a big part of Celiac disease.  We don't absorb well the eight essential B vitamins and other vitamins and minerals like calcium, resulting in osteopenia, hair loss, infertility, and neurological symptoms.  Unfortunately, doctors are not given much training in nutritional deficiencies and don't recognize the connection with the malabsorption of Celiac disease. We get very frustrated here with doctors ordering us to put a harmful substance in our bodies in order for them to say "that makes you sick".   Duh, we know that already. Do try to increase your consumption of gluten for at least two weeks before retesting.  Eat the chewy kinds of breads.  Cookies and cakes don't have as much gluten in them as those chewy artisan breads and thick pizza crusts. I admire your tenacity at continuing the gluten challenge.  Do keep us posted on your progress.  We'll continue to support you on your journey to diagnosis and recovery.
    • trents
      I would continue with your gluten challenge for another 2-3 weeks with the increased intake of gluten as outlined above.  You now say if you were confirmed to have celiac disease you would be even more strict about avoiding cross-contamination whereas in your first post you said, "Previously for many years 10+ I have been on a strict gluten free diet." Those statements seem to contradict one another. The celiac community as a whole understands that to be "on a strict gluten free diet" necessarily involves significant attention to cross-contamination. If you have not been strict with regard to CC up to now, it is difficult to say how that may have compromised your recovery and contributed to ongoing symptoms. Yet, even a significant reduction that falls short of gluten free can yield negative test results.
    • WildFlower1
      Thanks for your response! Yes, you’re correct that many of my symptoms improved when I went gluten-free, but issues like bone loss, infertility, hair loss, etc., seem to be the ones that haven’t responded. I’ve been on the gluten challenge for almost 7 weeks now, and I’m wondering how long I should continue it before testing again and making a final decision. I understand the benefits of eating gluten-free long-term, but I’m unsure how much longer to stick with the challenge to avoid another false negative celiac blood test.   What I would do differently if the test were confirmed positive is I’d receive a small amount of government help with gluten-free foods as a confirmed celiac. Doctors would be able to rule out further exhaustive testing. I’d also become even more strict about avoiding cross-contamination (for example, when eating at someone’s house, they may say something is safe, but it could have been cross-contaminated with gluten, or when going out to restaurants, they might say it’s fine, but it really isn’t). So, I would be extremely strict with cross-contamination if I were 100% confirmed as celiac, even though I’ve tried to be over the years but still seem to get sick.   Any advice on how long is typically recommended to continue the gluten challenge to avoid a false negative on the celiac blood test would be greatly appreciated!
    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...