Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Brand New


Apsaroke

Recommended Posts

Apsaroke Newbie

Hi everyone,

My name is Chris and it appears that I may have Celiac. I have recently completed the GI and the biopsy came back with blunted villi and mucosal duodenitis (sp?). I'm supposed to go in next week for a blood test specifically to test for Celiac.

I have had digestion issues off and on for years my entire life, however it's been within the last 4 years that things started to get escalate including attacks that have sent me to the hospital. The situation has gotten even worse since July of '07 where I am now pretty much not absorbing much of anything that I eat. I've lost a total of 30 pounds and now weigh in at 110 pounds (height is 5'4").

Additionally -- some of the attacks have been so bad that my body goes into overdrive trying to get rid of the "intruder" and it responds as it would with a severe allergic reaction. This sent me to meet with an allergist who has eliminated HAE (angioedema) and the only things that I responded to are Eggs(1), Milk(2), and Beef(3), listed in order of sensitivity along with scores.

I do have a couple of questions and would appreciate any advice.

1 - I'm seeing references here to enterolab. What exactly is that?

2 - Once the nurse from the GI office informed me of the biopsy results and the upcoming bloodwork, I stopped eating gluten. I have been gluton free for 2 days now. But further reading on the internet had me run across a reference that I should be eating a normal gluten diet prior to the blood test. My only issue is that is that today was the first day that I was able to actually eat something that didn't send me into stomach cramps. The pain is intolerable and I'm so weary of it. If this is something that I have to do, then of course I will do it, but I'm wondering if anyone here had stopped ingesting gluton prior to their bloodwork.

My biggest concern right now is the weight loss. While I understand that responses to going gluten free can be very individualistic, I'm hoping for some suggestions on timelines where other people who experienced weight loss might share with me how long it took for their weight to stabilize and then for them to regain weight.

Having this problem and having had it undiagnosed for so long has robbed me of quite a bit, not only due to never feeling well, but also the depression and irritability that I have had which has impacted my quality of life, but also most recently, it has cost me my marriage. I guess that I really need some hope that things do get better.

Thanks in advance for any help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Hi, and welcome to these boards. Your GI has done things backwards. Normally the blood test is done first, and then the biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. If your villi are blunted, and you have the symptoms, you have celiac disease. Especially since you've had a great response to the diet, there is no doubt at all about the diagnosis.

If I was you, I'd keep eating gluten-free and skip the blood test. You already have a firm diagnosis of celiac disease, no more tests needed. Geez, what is it with doctors these days!

It might take some time before you will gain weight, because you can't absorb nutrients due to villi damage. Be patient, things will normalize eventually. But you have been ill for a long time, you won't heal overnight.

Also, if you have tested allergic to milk and eggs, it would be wise to also eliminate those for the time being. I would also include soy in that list, as it can also hinder healing (besides the fact that unfermented soy is unhealthy).

Make sure you get enough protein and healthy fat. And yes, your body needs saturated fat, non-hydrogenated coconut oil is one of the healthiest saturated fats.

Apsaroke Newbie

Thank you for the quick reply, Ursa. It is really appreciated.

The GI procedure was done on the heels of an emergency room visit (the very next morning) so I won't hold hard feelings about the backwards approach. I was just so happy that someone was being very aggressive and serious in trying to find out what was happening.

I'll post-pone the bloodwork until I meet with my primary care physician and talk with her about it. I appreciate the validation you offer for that. Thinking about going back on gluten just for bloodwork and going through that pain again is something that I just really don't want to do.

Also, thank you for the advice on the non-hydrogenated coconut oil. I've added it to my shopping list. Today is the day I go out for my first gluten free grocery shopping trip!

I've also seen references on the internet about working with a dietician. Is this something that a lot of folks do or do most folks just go forward, avoid gluten and have things sort out on their own over time? I meet with my primary care physician on the 24th (whom I absolutely adore!) and I know she'd refer me to a dietician in a heartbeat if I asked for it. I just want to make sure it would actually be helpful or is that something that really wouldn't be worth the expense?

Thank you for your patience with yet another newbie to this. It's very nice to know that there is a network of individuals to help out. Makes it not so lonely and scary. :)

cruelshoes Enthusiast
1 - I'm seeing references here to enterolab. What exactly is that?

2 - Once the nurse from the GI office informed me of the biopsy results and the upcoming bloodwork, I stopped eating gluten. I have been gluton free for 2 days now. But further reading on the internet had me run across a reference that I should be eating a normal gluten diet prior to the blood test. My only issue is that is that today was the first day that I was able to actually eat something that didn't send me into stomach cramps. The pain is intolerable and I'm so weary of it. If this is something that I have to do, then of course I will do it, but I'm wondering if anyone here had stopped ingesting gluton prior to their bloodwork.

Open Original Shared Link is another form of testing that uses a stool sample rather than blood. It is generally used by those who cannot or choose not to go through testing in the traditional bloodwork/biopsy route. Enterolab's results are not diagnostic. It cannot give you a celiac diagnosis. It can only say that you are producing antibodies to gluten. Enterolab's results are not widely accepted by much of mainstream medicine, because Dr. Fine has never published his results in a peer reviewed forum. Since you already have positive results on a biopsy, I would not be inclined to do enerolab testing if I were in your situation. The biopsy is currently considered the "gold standard" for diagnosis.

I had my biopsy before my bloodwork as well. Normally the bloodwork leads the doctor to order the biopsy. That's the reason it is usually the other way around. A few days off of gluten is not going to be enough to skew your results. It's when you start to go longer than a few days that you can run into problems. If I were in your situation, I would get into the lab as soon as possible and have the complete celaic panel done. That will give you a baseline measurement now to monitor your healing against. Celeiac bloodwork should be repeated yearly to monitor compliance and healing. If you get a reading now, you will have something to compare it to with your future bloodwork. However, I will mention that it is not impossible to have negative bloodwork and a positive biopsy. It is still a celiac diagnosis, however. If your bloodwork is negative, I would still avoid gluten.

Hope this helps.

Nancym Enthusiast

I see no reason not to have the blood work done, just remember that 30% of celiac blood testing is negative unless the villi is completely destroyed. If you get an ignorant doctor they might try to convince you that, based on negative blood work, that you don't have celiac disease. A biopsy should be the final word on that.

Apsaroke Newbie

Thank you for the replies everyone. Sorry for the delay..I've been busy de-toxifying the house so to speak and running here and there replenishing the pantry.

I meet with my primary care doctor in the morning and will be discussing everything with her including the advice given here. I'm still gluten-free and I have now been on liquid vitamins for a week which is really starting to help the energy levels. Still hanging around at 110.5 pounds however, but at least I'm no longer losing weight!! :)

I think at this time, the only way I would consider going back on gluten for the blood test would be if I was also provided something for the nausea and pain management. At the end (prior to the emergency GI procedure) working was impossible and I was in the hospital the evening prior to the procedure.

Thanks again to everyone posting here.

happygirl Collaborator

Safe foods: https://www.celiac.com/articles/181/1/Safe-...ents/Page1.html

Unsafe foods: https://www.celiac.com/articles/182/1/Unsaf...ents/Page1.html

companies that won't hide gluten on their labels: Open Original Shared Link

Hope these help in navigating labels.

Other good websites for info:

www.celiacdiseasecenter.columbia.edu

www.celiacdisease.net

www.celiaccenter.org

www.celiaccentral.org


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor
I see no reason not to have the blood work done, just remember that 30% of celiac blood testing is negative unless the villi is completely destroyed. If you get an ignorant doctor they might try to convince you that, based on negative blood work, that you don't have celiac disease. A biopsy should be the final word on that.

Please forgive the correction but up to 30% of us even with total villi destruction will show negative. As one who was in end stage celiac before diagnosis with constant negative blood work I thought it was important to clarify. I agree with the others about the need to stay on the diet regardless of the results of the blood test. The endo was conclusive, you are celiac no matter what the blood tests show. Choosing to do them is up to you, just don't go by the result if it is negative. Dietary response is really the final word and when you combine that with the 'gold standard' of a positive biopsy there really is no doubt.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,993
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    DawnMaureen
    Newest Member
    DawnMaureen
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • WildFlower1
      Thanks for your response! Yes, you’re correct that many of my symptoms improved when I went gluten-free, but issues like bone loss, infertility, hair loss, etc., seem to be the ones that haven’t responded. I’ve been on the gluten challenge for almost 7 weeks now, and I’m wondering how long I should continue it before testing again and making a final decision. I understand the benefits of eating gluten-free long-term, but I’m unsure how much longer to stick with the challenge to avoid another false negative celiac blood test.   What I would do differently if the test were confirmed positive is I’d receive a small amount of government help with gluten-free foods as a confirmed celiac. Doctors would be able to rule out further exhaustive testing. I’d also become even more strict about avoiding cross-contamination (for example, when eating at someone’s house, they may say something is safe, but it could have been cross-contaminated with gluten, or when going out to restaurants, they might say it’s fine, but it really isn’t). So, I would be extremely strict with cross-contamination if I were 100% confirmed as celiac, even though I’ve tried to be over the years but still seem to get sick.   Any advice on how long is typically recommended to continue the gluten challenge to avoid a false negative on the celiac blood test would be greatly appreciated!
    • trents
      Okay, it does make sense to continue the gluten challenge as long as you are already in the middle of it. But what will change if you rule it out? I mean, you have concluded that whatever label you want to give the condition, many of your symptoms improved when you went gluten free. Am I correct in that? According to how I understand your posting, the only symptom that hasn't responded to gluten free eating is the bone demineralization. Did I misunderstand? And if you do test positive, what will you do different than you are doing now? You have already been doing for years the main thing you should be doing and that is eating gluten free. Concerning how long you should stay on the gluten challenge, how many weeks are you into it already?
    • WildFlower1
      I mean that I will be re-taking the celiac blood test again while I am currently on the gluten challenge right now, but not sure how many weeks more to keep going, to ensure a false negative does not happen. Thank you.
    • WildFlower1
      Thank you for your help, I am currently in the middle of the gluten challenge. A bit over 6 weeks in. At 4 weeks I got the celiac blood tests and that is when they were negative. So to rule out the false negative, since I’m in the middle of the gluten challenge right now and will never do this again, I wanted to continue consuming gluten to the point to make sure the blood tests are not a false negative - which I did not receive a firm answer for how many weeks total.    My issue is, with these blood tests the doctors say “you are not celiac” and rule it out completely as a potential cause of my issues, when the symptoms scream of it. I want to rule out this 30 year mystery for my own health since I’m in the middle of it right now. Thank you!
    • trents
      I am a male and had developed osteopenia by age 50 which is when I finally got dx with celiac disease. I am sure I had it for at least 13 years before that because it was then I developed idiopathic elevated liver enzymes. I now have a little scoliosis and pronounced kyphosis (upper spine curvature).  All of your symptoms scream of celiac disease, even if the testing you have had done does not. You may be an atypical celiac, meaning the disease is not manifesting itself in your gut but is attacking other body systems. There is such a thing as sero negative celiac disease. But you still have not given me a satisfactory answer to my question of why do you need a differential dx between celiac disease and NCGS when either one would call for complete abstinence from gluten, which you have already been practicing except for short periods when you were undergoing a gluten challenge. Why do you want to put a toxic substance into your body for weeks when, even if it did produce a positive test result for celiac disease, neither you or your doctors would do anything different? Regardless of what doctors are recommending to you, it is your body it is affecting not theirs and they don't seem to have given you any good justification for starting another gluten challenge. Where you live, are doctors kings or something?
×
×
  • Create New...