Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Gluten Free Labeling Law


Jess07

Recommended Posts

Jess07 Newbie

I'm highly sensitive to any gluten, milk, or soy. And with the new 20ppm gluten free labeling law, how are we supposed to tell what is and isn't gluten free if the label says it's gluten free? :huh:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

A true gluten-free claim is impossible.

Scientifically you can not prove the absence of any substance, whether it be gluten, arsenic, cyanide, or rodent droppings. You can only test a sample, which is not 100% of the total. Your test has a sensitivity, below which the substance being tested for can not be detected.

When a supplier says that their product passes a test at 20ppm (or 200ppm), this does not mean that there are 19ppm (or 199ppm) of whatever in their product. It merely means that the level at which they have tested to confirm the absence of gluten has a test tolerance at that level. As I said, no test can ever be 100% certain. As the testing and sampling become, respectively, more comprehensive and more sensitive, the cost goes up dramatically.

Zero gluten content, supposing it could be proven, would be "less that 200 ppm" and "less than 20 ppm" as those are upper limits. The actual content could be much lower, but it cannot be proven to be so.

KelBelle Newbie
I'm highly sensitive to any gluten, milk, or soy. And with the new 20ppm gluten free labeling law, how are we supposed to tell what is and isn't gluten free if the label says it's gluten free? :huh:

I am extremely sensitive as well. I have made the difficult decision that I will not purchase anything that is produced in a facility containing gluten. I figure that is the only way to drastically reduce the chances of cross contamination. It is very frustrating. The more whole foods the better I guess.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,962
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tiannuo
    Newest Member
    Tiannuo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Pasballard
      I have Celiacs and want you to be aware of the amount of weight you can potentially put on if you rely on gluten free snacks, bread etc.,they  are high in carbs.  I put on 25 lbs in a short amount of time.  Whole Foods are the best way to go but I struggle with this.  The cost of gluten free is also a problem.  I love black licorice but most have gluten.  My favorite chili seasoning as well.  The list is endless.  I take  Advil liquid gels and had no idea until I read this.  I hope you do better than I have done.  I feel I am destined to suffer daily no matter what.  My aunt didn’t take care of herself and died from complications.  I hope you can get on a good routine.
    • growlinhard1
      Thank you, I appreciate the response. I'm going to begin the gluten free diet and wait for the biopsy results. I feel fairly certain that it's the right thing for my well being. I will keep you posted.
    • Scott Adams
      The flu vaccine is indeed not 100% effective every year, as its effectiveness varies depending on how well the vaccine strains match the circulating flu viruses. However, even in years when the match is less than perfect, the flu vaccine still provides significant benefits. Studies consistently show that vaccinated individuals who contract the flu often experience milder symptoms, a lower risk of complications, and a reduced likelihood of hospitalization or death compared to those who are unvaccinated. For high-risk groups, such as the elderly, young children, and individuals with chronic health conditions, the flu vaccine remains a critical tool for reducing severe outcomes. Regarding the mention of risks associated with vaccines, it’s important to note that the flu vaccine is generally very safe for most people. Serious side effects are extremely rare, and the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks for the vast majority of individuals. If someone has specific concerns about vaccine safety due to medical conditions or allergies, they should consult their healthcare provider to discuss their options. As for alternative measures like a D Lamp (ultraviolet light disinfection), while these can be useful for reducing pathogens in the environment, they are not a substitute for vaccination. The flu virus spreads primarily through respiratory droplets, and personal protection measures like hand hygiene, masking, and improving indoor ventilation can complement vaccination but cannot replace its targeted immune protection.
    • trents
      Because you have already had the "gold standard" test done, and because you have some experiential evidence that removing gluten from your diet causes you to feel better, it would make sense to begin the gluten-free diet as you wait for biopsy results.
    • growlinhard1
      I wasn't given any blood tests. I think I should try the gluten free diet because when I cut it out a few weeks ago for just a couple of days, I know I started feeling better. The difference was actually pretty dramatic. When I learned gluten free eating may cause false negative biopsy results, I went back to gluten full force and feel like you know what × 10. Do you feel it would be okay since the gold standard for diagnosis is behind me or should I wait for biopsy results? In your opinion, of course. I know you can't offer me medical advice.
×
×
  • Create New...