Jump to content
  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Mayo Study On Pillcam


Lisa

Recommended Posts

Lisa Mentor

Given Imaging Announces New Mayo Clinic Study Concludes Celiac Disease May Be More Severe Than Symptoms Indicate for Some Patients

PillCam® SB Visualizes Disease Severity, Guides Treatment and Provides Better Sensitivity for the Detection of Villus Atrophy

March 03, 2008: 08:30 AM EST

Given Imaging Ltd. (NASDAQ: GIVN) today announced that a study by researchers at the Mayo Clinic reported that capsule endoscopy is a more effective tool to diagnose celiac disease and detect damage throughout the small intestine than upper endoscopy. Researchers also found that celiac affects a highly variable portion of the small intestine and that the severity of symptoms did not correlate to the severity of intestinal damage.

The Mayo study utilizing Given Imaging's PillCam SB was led by Mayo Clinic gastroenterologist Joseph Murray, M.D. and appears in this month's issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

"We're pleased that this study confirms that PillCam SB, which has the advantage of visualizing the entire small bowel, can help clinicians diagnose and monitor the severity of celiac disease regardless of their patient's symptoms," said Homi Shamir, CEO of Given Imaging.

According to the Mayo Clinic, this study, which is the first of its kind, used capsule endoscopy to view intestinal damage in 38 patients with untreated, biopsy-proven celiac disease. Indications for clinical evaluation were malabsorption syndrome and iron deficiency anemia. Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients. Neither capsule endoscopy nor upper GI series yielded false positives.

This study also indicated that a high proportion of adults may not heal their intestinal abnormalities even after a year or more on a gluten-free diet. Biopsy specimens of the proximal small bowel alone may not reflect the healing that has occurred distally in response to a gluten-free diet. Capsule endoscopy showed that healing in the small intestine occurred from the distal to the proximal direction with most residual changes remaining in the duodenum. Capsule endoscopy may play a role in monitoring the healing process of a patient on a gluten-free diet.

Given Imaging's PillCam SB video capsule was the first capsule endoscope on the market designed specifically to help doctors see inside all 30-feet of the small bowel (small intestine) to diagnose disorders such as Crohn's disease, Celiac disease, benign and cancerous tumors, ulcerative colitis as well as others disorders.

The smooth plastic capsule contains a miniature video camera and is equipped with a light source on one end, batteries, a radio transmitter and antenna. After it is swallowed, the PillCam SB capsule transmits approximately 50,000 images over the course of an 8-hour period (about 2 images per second) to a data recording device attached to a belt worn around the patient's waist. The small bowel images are then downloaded into a Given


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



njbeachbum Explorer

pretty incredible....

so my doctor wanted to do a capsule endoscopy in order to officially rule out my crohn's diagnosis from 14 years ago.... however, my insurance carrier (AETNA) denied it..... isn't that nice? they are still appealing it, but i think it would be valuable to see the extent of the damage that my untreated celiac had on my insides for so many years

happygirl Collaborator
Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients. Neither capsule endoscopy nor upper GI series yielded false positives.

This is HUGE!

Thanks for posting this, MG.

Ridgewalker Contributor
Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients.

This is HUGE!

Thanks for posting this, MG.

That's the line that I immediately zeroed in on as well. It really is huge-- let's hope that this soon becomes the standard method!

Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Stupid question but this means it is possible to dx Celiac based on the way the insides look??? My ped gi said he thought my daughter had a patch of flattened villi but would wait on the biopsy of that area to say yea or nay. Since he was looking for Celiac, he could convince himself it was a damaged spot. Once the biopsy came back negative, he decided it was normal looking. So a camera could see all of the intestines and if a spot looked bad, one could say it was Celiac????? Am I making the right jump of reasoning there??? I do have pictures and you can see it looks different but they said looks aren't enough to give a dx of Celiac. So the pill camera would change that?? EVen so that is a huge difference of stats.

Just wondering if in practice this would really give way to more dx of celiac or just lead to more frustration. YOu look like you have damage spots but we can't get a biopsy so can't give you a dx. That would be irritating to say the least.

Thanks

Stacie

blueeyedmanda Community Regular

Thanks for sharing Lisa, very informative.

I know a coworker had the pill test in the fall.

MaryJones2 Enthusiast

I am very glad that the PillCam is finally getting press! I was diagnosed via PillCam back when it was new. My bloodwork and endoscopic biopsy were both negative so I was very thankful that my doctor wanted to try it. We're both computer nerds so it was more 'wow this is cool' but it turned out to be so much more than that. I don't think most people understand that there is a huge section of your intestines not seen by a colonoscopy and endoscopy.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



moldlady Rookie

I think the pill cam is a great advancement in the area of tech. diagnosis. Finally a non invasive way to better diagnose. ;)

ML

tom Contributor
. . Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients.

This is HUGE!

Thanks for posting this, MG.

That's the line that I immediately zeroed in on as well. It really is huge-- let's hope that this soon becomes the standard method!

This is REALLY something!!

I've had a problem since forEVER w/ SO many ppl (I suppose mostly those in the 55% :P ) making a big deal about an endoscopy being "The Gold Standard" for dx.

Such an exclusionary term. :bahface:

Most of us know of the problems/subjective nature in both the endoscopy's procedure & interpretation, but it's a bit of a relief to see such irrefutable data.

JulesH Rookie

This sounds amazing, but does the Pillcam get any biopsies when it's in there? Or would the doctors need to do an endoscopy and get a biopsy if the Pillcam is negative? I'm just wondering because this seems like a much easier option to try to convince my sister to do, since she's very reluctant to do an endoscopy, and refuses to believe that her positive blood test means anything.

  • 3 weeks later...
jmj0803 Apprentice

My daughter just had this done. She has had two endoscopies/biopsies in the last three years. Her GI did this because the upper endoscopy is very invasive and the pill came is "COOL" non invasive for kids. My daughter is nine. She still has symptoms of gluten even on a gluten free diet. After the camera endoscopy he diagnosed her with refractory sprue and put her on Entocort. Her intestines were much more damaged then the upper could see. After one day on the medication her diarrhea went away after 9 years. The Camera can not take a biopsy although it does take 2 pictures a second for eight hours I imagine it is very detailed. You probably would have to have the upper endoscopy after if a biopsy is needed.

Sarah8793 Enthusiast

This is absolutely fascinating! I really wish I could have done this a few years ago when I was still eating gluten. I had two endoscopy/small bowel biopsies done and they were negative. I'm 95% sure I have celiac diesease though from my genetic testing and enterolab results. I'm wondering if I could/should go get it done now to see if there is still damage or as a tool for measuring improvement? Hmmm, maybe a visit is in store with my GI doc.

Gentleheart Enthusiast

How much does this PillCam test cost and do you HAVE to have a specialist prescribe it? Can a consumer get one done on his own if you're willing to pay for it?

Lisa Mentor
How much does this PillCam test cost and do you HAVE to have a specialist prescribe it? Can a consumer get one done on his own if you're willing to pay for it?

I would assume that your Doctor would refer you to a Gastro guy familiar with the proceedure. I bet it's rather pricey, too.

  • 2 weeks later...
JodiC Apprentice

I had this procedure done at the Mayo Clinic by Dr Joseph Murry. (He's been my gastro Dr since 2005.) The pill showed some areas that are inflammed and some that are healed. (zero flattened villi though) Unfortunately the last 2 hours of the pillcam malfunctioned and he wasn't able to see the last of the intestine. I am heading back to Mayo in May due to unexplained bleeding and low abd pain along with fatty liver. He's fearful that something was missed in that last 2 hours and wants to retest. Should be interesting. I'm one of those people who doesn't seem to be getting any better with the gluten free diet. He feels the continued malabsorption and pain is due to the liver problems.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
      5

      Skin issues

    2. - N Young posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      Frustrated with Providers

    3. - trents replied to ThomasA55's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Iron loss and potential celiac.

    4. - trents replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Test interpretations

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,115
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Ginarwebb
    Newest Member
    Ginarwebb
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      These articles may be helpful:    
    • Jmartes71
      I went to ER on the 30th because I didn't want to wait and saw dr at desk for intake. I went for NOTHING!. ER Dr was very nice but made it seem as if I was a nut case rater than coming in for real issues calmly explaining its staph! Staph,  by look no blood test, no skin test. No looking in my nose and throat was given a prescription for jock cream and some pills ! I made the mistake of saying Im waiting on Infectious disease. She asked how did I get referral and I said I did it online.The next day I checked the status and it was denied! I did get  a referral to the dermatology office i went to last year that over charged me and did a biopsy on me stating inconclusive! I went to another dermatologist and he stated I should see Infectious disease at place i put in referral. With that I contacted that dermatologist and waiting to see if he thinks dermatology or Infectious disease is the route.I do have appointment for dermatology next week.Until then i did purchase Zahler paraGuard advance intestinal  flora support  from Sprouts. Im also very alarmed that the fact celiac isn't addressed properly infact its downplayed. When I had my son tested for HLA-DQ2 and it came out positive because he is eating everything and he is extremely skinny but he isn't dealing with severe diagestive issues because thats all he knows NOW or yet because he is still young 21.I too didn't know any difference when i was that age because thats all we know.Life changes will get him in latter years im afraid because what im dealing with.That scares me.The specialist we went to was only about congestion he is getting.He is getting congestion because he is eating what he isn't supposed too! Zero talk about celiac and HLA-DQ2 positive. Only talk was he is congested because we live in the Valley! They wanted to do surgery! I did write again to our district leader considering when I did call, the guy stated he knew all about celiac. I really wanted to tell him NO YOU DON'T but held my tongue. For my skin sores the cream given didn't do anything because ive also had in past.Ive been putting liquid vitamin c on it and taking vitamins which is making a little difference just with the last few days of doing.
    • N Young
      I have been Gluten Free for 25 years and havent eaten gluten knowingly during that time.   Such a rocky life, I have had issues since I was 16 when physicians stated I needed to see a psychiatrist. I am now 70 years old. I also had Dermatitis herpetiformis. I had negative tests on biopsy, blood test etc but no doctor mentioned that I needed to do a gluten challenge. I went on an elimination diet and found relief on the Dermatitis within a month. I have no doubt that I am celiac and very sensitive now. Now my issue is that I changed physicians due to retirement and he performed a blood test and included a celiac test. I was very upset because I did not request the test and had not been eating gluten for 25 years. Of course the test was negative.  My question - Will this cause me any issues with health treatment if my records now have that I dont have celiac? I like this physician and I am appalled that he performed the test. (he told me his brother is also celiac).  I feel that we are still living in the dark ages. I dont want to cause problems because I rarely need health treatment since I live a fairly healthy lifestyle.  Since I am at this age and been through so much getting to this point am I being unreasonable for being upset? I am not expecting to see this physician for another 2 months.  Need to know if I can expect issues with future treatments. How can a physician not know about the gluten challenge this day and age?   
    • trents
      "Risk free genetically"? Very low risk, actually. But, we are still learning about the genetics of celiac disease. Speaking of milk, some studies show that CMP (Cow's Milk Protein) can damage the small bowel villi like celiac disease does. Also, some meds (NSAIDS, Olmesartan - a blood pressure med) and some infections can also blunt SB villi.
    • trents
      @Aretaeus Cappadocia! The post you were looking for about omeprazol acting as an anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressant was made (yesterday, I believe) by knitty kitty. Current guidelines for the gluten challenge prior to an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel is the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat flour bread) for at least two weeks prior to the day of the procedure. @Ginarwebb, your tTG-IGA >250 would seem to be a pretty high test result, though to be sure of that statement, I would need to see what the lab used for a "normal" range. Do you have that number also? Different labs use different scales. There isn't an industry standard yet. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac blood antibody testing. Your ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER (aka, "EMA") is positive as well. This is an older test, and a relative expensive one, compared to the tTG-IGA which has largely replaced. But the EMA is still ordered by some docs and is highly reliable. That both of them agree in your case and this is strong evidence that you have celiac disease. Concerning the ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY TITER (aka, "total IGA") being high, there are two things of importance. First, it tells us you are not "IGA deficient" such that your tTG-IGA test result is reliable. Second, a high total IGA test score can suggest other health concerns, some of which are serious. It can also mean nothing. Talk to your doctor about this. I would also suggest you research the implications of a high total IGA. In addition to IGA celiac diagnostic tests there are also IGG tests which are handy when total IGA is sub normal.  Here is an article outlining the various tests that can be run for diagnosing celiac disease:  
×
×
  • Create New...