Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Mayo Study On Pillcam


Lisa

Recommended Posts

Lisa Mentor

Given Imaging Announces New Mayo Clinic Study Concludes Celiac Disease May Be More Severe Than Symptoms Indicate for Some Patients

PillCam® SB Visualizes Disease Severity, Guides Treatment and Provides Better Sensitivity for the Detection of Villus Atrophy

March 03, 2008: 08:30 AM EST

Given Imaging Ltd. (NASDAQ: GIVN) today announced that a study by researchers at the Mayo Clinic reported that capsule endoscopy is a more effective tool to diagnose celiac disease and detect damage throughout the small intestine than upper endoscopy. Researchers also found that celiac affects a highly variable portion of the small intestine and that the severity of symptoms did not correlate to the severity of intestinal damage.

The Mayo study utilizing Given Imaging's PillCam SB was led by Mayo Clinic gastroenterologist Joseph Murray, M.D. and appears in this month's issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

"We're pleased that this study confirms that PillCam SB, which has the advantage of visualizing the entire small bowel, can help clinicians diagnose and monitor the severity of celiac disease regardless of their patient's symptoms," said Homi Shamir, CEO of Given Imaging.

According to the Mayo Clinic, this study, which is the first of its kind, used capsule endoscopy to view intestinal damage in 38 patients with untreated, biopsy-proven celiac disease. Indications for clinical evaluation were malabsorption syndrome and iron deficiency anemia. Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients. Neither capsule endoscopy nor upper GI series yielded false positives.

This study also indicated that a high proportion of adults may not heal their intestinal abnormalities even after a year or more on a gluten-free diet. Biopsy specimens of the proximal small bowel alone may not reflect the healing that has occurred distally in response to a gluten-free diet. Capsule endoscopy showed that healing in the small intestine occurred from the distal to the proximal direction with most residual changes remaining in the duodenum. Capsule endoscopy may play a role in monitoring the healing process of a patient on a gluten-free diet.

Given Imaging's PillCam SB video capsule was the first capsule endoscope on the market designed specifically to help doctors see inside all 30-feet of the small bowel (small intestine) to diagnose disorders such as Crohn's disease, Celiac disease, benign and cancerous tumors, ulcerative colitis as well as others disorders.

The smooth plastic capsule contains a miniature video camera and is equipped with a light source on one end, batteries, a radio transmitter and antenna. After it is swallowed, the PillCam SB capsule transmits approximately 50,000 images over the course of an 8-hour period (about 2 images per second) to a data recording device attached to a belt worn around the patient's waist. The small bowel images are then downloaded into a Given


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



njbeachbum Explorer

pretty incredible....

so my doctor wanted to do a capsule endoscopy in order to officially rule out my crohn's diagnosis from 14 years ago.... however, my insurance carrier (AETNA) denied it..... isn't that nice? they are still appealing it, but i think it would be valuable to see the extent of the damage that my untreated celiac had on my insides for so many years

happygirl Collaborator
Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients. Neither capsule endoscopy nor upper GI series yielded false positives.

This is HUGE!

Thanks for posting this, MG.

Ridgewalker Contributor
Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients.

This is HUGE!

Thanks for posting this, MG.

That's the line that I immediately zeroed in on as well. It really is huge-- let's hope that this soon becomes the standard method!

Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Stupid question but this means it is possible to dx Celiac based on the way the insides look??? My ped gi said he thought my daughter had a patch of flattened villi but would wait on the biopsy of that area to say yea or nay. Since he was looking for Celiac, he could convince himself it was a damaged spot. Once the biopsy came back negative, he decided it was normal looking. So a camera could see all of the intestines and if a spot looked bad, one could say it was Celiac????? Am I making the right jump of reasoning there??? I do have pictures and you can see it looks different but they said looks aren't enough to give a dx of Celiac. So the pill camera would change that?? EVen so that is a huge difference of stats.

Just wondering if in practice this would really give way to more dx of celiac or just lead to more frustration. YOu look like you have damage spots but we can't get a biopsy so can't give you a dx. That would be irritating to say the least.

Thanks

Stacie

blueeyedmanda Community Regular

Thanks for sharing Lisa, very informative.

I know a coworker had the pill test in the fall.

MaryJones2 Enthusiast

I am very glad that the PillCam is finally getting press! I was diagnosed via PillCam back when it was new. My bloodwork and endoscopic biopsy were both negative so I was very thankful that my doctor wanted to try it. We're both computer nerds so it was more 'wow this is cool' but it turned out to be so much more than that. I don't think most people understand that there is a huge section of your intestines not seen by a colonoscopy and endoscopy.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



moldlady Rookie

I think the pill cam is a great advancement in the area of tech. diagnosis. Finally a non invasive way to better diagnose. ;)

ML

tom Contributor
. . Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients.

This is HUGE!

Thanks for posting this, MG.

That's the line that I immediately zeroed in on as well. It really is huge-- let's hope that this soon becomes the standard method!

This is REALLY something!!

I've had a problem since forEVER w/ SO many ppl (I suppose mostly those in the 55% :P ) making a big deal about an endoscopy being "The Gold Standard" for dx.

Such an exclusionary term. :bahface:

Most of us know of the problems/subjective nature in both the endoscopy's procedure & interpretation, but it's a bit of a relief to see such irrefutable data.

JulesH Rookie

This sounds amazing, but does the Pillcam get any biopsies when it's in there? Or would the doctors need to do an endoscopy and get a biopsy if the Pillcam is negative? I'm just wondering because this seems like a much easier option to try to convince my sister to do, since she's very reluctant to do an endoscopy, and refuses to believe that her positive blood test means anything.

  • 3 weeks later...
jmj0803 Apprentice

My daughter just had this done. She has had two endoscopies/biopsies in the last three years. Her GI did this because the upper endoscopy is very invasive and the pill came is "COOL" non invasive for kids. My daughter is nine. She still has symptoms of gluten even on a gluten free diet. After the camera endoscopy he diagnosed her with refractory sprue and put her on Entocort. Her intestines were much more damaged then the upper could see. After one day on the medication her diarrhea went away after 9 years. The Camera can not take a biopsy although it does take 2 pictures a second for eight hours I imagine it is very detailed. You probably would have to have the upper endoscopy after if a biopsy is needed.

Sarah8793 Enthusiast

This is absolutely fascinating! I really wish I could have done this a few years ago when I was still eating gluten. I had two endoscopy/small bowel biopsies done and they were negative. I'm 95% sure I have celiac diesease though from my genetic testing and enterolab results. I'm wondering if I could/should go get it done now to see if there is still damage or as a tool for measuring improvement? Hmmm, maybe a visit is in store with my GI doc.

Gentleheart Enthusiast

How much does this PillCam test cost and do you HAVE to have a specialist prescribe it? Can a consumer get one done on his own if you're willing to pay for it?

Lisa Mentor
How much does this PillCam test cost and do you HAVE to have a specialist prescribe it? Can a consumer get one done on his own if you're willing to pay for it?

I would assume that your Doctor would refer you to a Gastro guy familiar with the proceedure. I bet it's rather pricey, too.

  • 2 weeks later...
JodiC Apprentice

I had this procedure done at the Mayo Clinic by Dr Joseph Murry. (He's been my gastro Dr since 2005.) The pill showed some areas that are inflammed and some that are healed. (zero flattened villi though) Unfortunately the last 2 hours of the pillcam malfunctioned and he wasn't able to see the last of the intestine. I am heading back to Mayo in May due to unexplained bleeding and low abd pain along with fatty liver. He's fearful that something was missed in that last 2 hours and wants to retest. Should be interesting. I'm one of those people who doesn't seem to be getting any better with the gluten free diet. He feels the continued malabsorption and pain is due to the liver problems.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to melthebell's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Persistent isolated high DGP-IGG in child despite gluten-free diet

    2. - melthebell posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Persistent isolated high DGP-IGG in child despite gluten-free diet

    3. - trents commented on Scott Adams's article in Winter 2026 Issue
      4

      Why Celiac Diagnosis Still Takes Years—and How to Change That

    4. - Jmartes71 replied to Known1's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      4

      What would you do - neighbor brought gluten-free pizza from Papa Murphy's

    5. - par18 commented on Scott Adams's article in Winter 2026 Issue
      4

      Why Celiac Diagnosis Still Takes Years—and How to Change That

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,498
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    genliu
    Newest Member
    genliu
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @melthebell! I certainly would have a biopsy repeated as it has been 5 years since the first one. You mentioned he was scheduled for an endoscopy but make sure a biopsy is also done. It's possible he, like you are, is a "silent" celiac where the damage to the intestinal mucosa happens very slowly and can take years to manifest to the point of being detectable and where symptoms are minimal or absent. At 10 years old, his immune system may not be mature enough het to trigger the usual IGA responses that the IGA celiac tests are designed to detect.  I would also have genetic testing done to confirm that he has or doesn't have the potential to develop celiac disease. The genetic profile can also offer insight into the type of celiac disease a person will develop if they ever convert from latent to active. Take a look at table 2 under the section "Types of Celiac Disease" in the article found in this link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9980758/  Genetic testing is available from 3rd party labs. I think you just have to send in a cheek swab sample.
    • melthebell
      Hello community; it's nice to have found you. I am a 42 year old biopsy confirmed celiac. I have had it since I was 18. Well managed on a gluten free diet. No idea if I have the gene (presume I do) as never tested. Diagnosed as was anaemic and had a high celiac market (can't recall which), and a positive biopsy. Asymptomatic. Given this, I regularly test my two children. My eldest is the child in question. First tested at age 5 due to slight anaemia. Everything negative except for a slightly high DGP IGG (slightly elevated at 25). Not IGA deficient. Did a biopsy with a pediatric gastro, was negative. Next test at age 8. Everything once again negative, high DGP IGG at 116 U/ml this time. Living in a country now with no celiac knowledge so decided to whack him on a gluten-free diet and see how he goes. Next test at age 9 after a year on gluten-free diet. Everything once again negative, high DGP IGG at 174 U/ml this time! On a gluten-free diet. Final test was a week ago at age 10, on continued gluten-free diet. Once again a positive DGP IGG, this time over 250 U/ml. On a gluten-free diet. what the heck is going on with my kid? We have seen a pediatric gastro via telehealth, who was equally puzzled and suggested doing a gluten challenge and an endoscopy, which we have schedule for end of April. Kid is otherwise fine. Energetic and growing well. No significant gastrointestinal symptoms. Has anyone encountered something like this before?
    • Jmartes71
      Domino's and Mountain Mike also has glutenfree pizza.However the issue is the cross contamination. Not worth a few minutes of yum yums i n the taste buds with a painful explosion later.
    • Scott Adams
      I don't recall seeing "many people here recommending RO water," but reverse osmosis (RO) water is water that has been purified by forcing it through a very fine membrane that removes dissolved salts, heavy metals, fluoride, nitrates, PFAS, and many other contaminants. It is one of the most thorough household filtration methods available and can be especially beneficial in areas with well water or known contamination concerns. While RO systems also remove beneficial minerals like calcium and magnesium and may produce slightly “flat”-tasting water, most dietary minerals come from food rather than drinking water, so this is not usually a health concern for most people. Overall, RO water is very clean and safe to drink, and it can be a smart option where water quality is questionable, though it may not be necessary in areas with well-tested municipal water.
    • Scott Adams
      With the wide availability of frozen prepared gluten-free pizzas, for example DiGiorno's, it's probably best to avoid the risk of eating pizza in restaurants that also make regular pizza.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.