Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Pillcam In A Week

Sandi*

Recommended Posts

Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
Posted

Both my bloodwork and biopsy were negative for celiac disease (two years ago); however, I can definitely see positive response to diet change. I've been gluten-light for about 3 or 4 months. That is, sometimes I would have a regular cookie (maybe once every two weeks) and I just realized that I've been glutening myself unknowingly all this time. For example, I drink this coffee substitute that I didn't realize that barley malt. I've used cooking sauces that had wheat protein. I know that I have to be more careful.

However, I'm trying to figure out, if in case I do have celiac disease, is this gluten-light diet still enough to show damage that could be detected by the pillcam test? Or would I have to stuff myself with bread for months? I'm still having a lot of symptoms and digestive problems (mainly bloating and constipation, pain, cramps, as well as knee pain). So I figured I might as well take an advantage of the fact that I've been glutening myself and don't start being really strict about the diet until the test is over. It's only a week away so if a little gluten here and there is what it takes to get a diagnosis I can deal with that. Since I never went fully gluten-free for a long enough period of time I should still show damage, right (provided it is celiac disease)?

OK, so just to make sure I've expressed myself well enough, my question is: would my intestines still show damage since I've only been gluten-light but not fully gluten free or would that be enough for them to heal anyway?

TIA!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


moldlady Rookie
moldlady
Posted

Sandi,

How did the pill cam go? Did it show anything?

ML

Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
Posted
  • Author

moldlady, it's not for another week (actually more like 10 days, it's on the 8th) and then I assume I will need to get an appointment to actually talk about the results. But I'll post here once I'm all finished!

moldlady Rookie
moldlady
Posted

Thanks Sandi,

Sorry, I thought I read about this two weeks ago and then I just checked the date of your post. Someone else must have posted something similar. Dah!

I wish we could get test results as fast as food!

I'll be waiting for your report.

ML

MDRB Explorer
MDRB
Posted

Hi,

Most doctors think that the only way to diagnose celiacs is with an endoscopy.

When I had mine done, I had been gluten lite for about 6 months, as a result my blood tests came back negative. Before the endoscopy, I was told to eat at least one gluten based meal every day for one month otherwise the test would not be conclusive. From what you have said about your symptoms and reaction to the diet it seems likely that you do have celiacs.

Good luck

ThatlldoGyp Rookie
ThatlldoGyp
Posted

yes, if you have celiac, your villi would most likely still show damage. I just read a study... endos taken on Catholic celiacs. Villi damage still seen when their only known gluten intake would be the communion wafer once a week, all participants were asymptomatic yet still showed damage enough to be seen with sb biopsy. So, based on that study, then you should be good. Either way, it takes adults 6 months to a year to repair their gut, so damage from before you went gluten-free lite should still be present, add that to additional exposures and you are most likely glutened enough to have damage.

Please talk to your Dr. about this though, your degree of sensitivity is also important, and just because you may not have celiac doesn't mean that you aren't gluten sensitive. Hope you feel better soona and good luck on your pill cam study.

Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
Posted
  • Author
Hi,

Most doctors think that the only way to diagnose celiacs is with an endoscopy.

When I had mine done, I had been gluten lite for about 6 months, as a result my blood tests came back negative. Before the endoscopy, I was told to eat at least one gluten based meal every day for one month otherwise the test would not be conclusive. From what you have said about your symptoms and reaction to the diet it seems likely that you do have celiacs.

Good luck

new2celiacs, thanks for the answer. Did you have the endo done yet? Was eating gluten for a month sufficient to get a positive diagnosis?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
Posted
  • Author
yes, if you have celiac, your villi would most likely still show damage. I just read a study... endos taken on Catholic celiacs. Villi damage still seen when their only known gluten intake would be the communion wafer once a week, all participants were asymptomatic yet still showed damage enough to be seen with sb biopsy. So, based on that study, then you should be good. Either way, it takes adults 6 months to a year to repair their gut, so damage from before you went gluten-free lite should still be present, add that to additional exposures and you are most likely glutened enough to have damage.

Please talk to your Dr. about this though, your degree of sensitivity is also important, and just because you may not have celiac doesn't mean that you aren't gluten sensitive. Hope you feel better soona and good luck on your pill cam study.

Thanks Tha'lldoGyp, you're answer is kind of what I was thinking. I still have symptoms so I don't think I healed by just being gluten light.

My doctor is great when it comes to running tests, etc. but I think she's also very results-oriented. Basically, if I test negative for celiac, then according to her there's no reason not to eat gluten. But I'm really grateful for all the testing I got and I'm just going to listen to my own body. I feel better not eating gluten so I definitely believe that I'm at least gluten sensitive if not celiac and won't go back to eating it ;).

MDRB Explorer
MDRB
Posted
new2celiacs, thanks for the answer. Did you have the endo done yet? Was eating gluten for a month sufficient to get a positive diagnosis?

Yep, I had my endoscopy a while ago and it showed enough damage to the villi for a diagnosis. My understanding is that there are other things that can cause slight villi damage and that the doctor might want to do another endoscopy after a few months gluten free to check that the damage is healing with the new diet.

Having said all this, If I knew how sick the gluten was going to make me, I would not have gone back on it for those for weeks. They were the worst 4 weeks of my life, I was SO sick I could barely get out of bed.

The only reason to get a diagnosis is if you are not sure if you feel better without the gluten. Otherwise its just not worth the time feeling sick.

Good luck!

Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
Posted
  • Author

I'm sorry those 4 weeks were so horrible for you! But at least you have a proper diagnosis now.

As for me I don't think I'd go back to gluten eating for the endoscopy since I already had one and it was negative. I'm just hoping that the camera might find something further down there that the endo could have missed. I'm still so sick that I think if I do have celiac disease then the damage will still be there. But if not, I don't care, I'll just listen to my body and see how I respond to a full removal of gluten. Thank you for your help!

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

This is a recently released study done by the Mayo:

Given Imaging Announces New Mayo Clinic Study Concludes Celiac Disease May Be More Severe Than Symptoms Indicate for Some Patients

PillCam

Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
Posted
  • Author

Very informative, thank you!

  • 3 weeks later...
Sandi* Apprentice
Sandi*
Posted
  • Author

So the test did not confirm celiac disease. The only thing that was found were several intramucosal lesions. To be honest I'm not exactly sure what they are. I have a colonoscopy and my doc wants to take a biopsy of these lesions.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,013
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    pawious25
    Newest Member
    pawious25
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Bebygirl01
      How many people here are aware that there are 9 types of gluten that Celiacs should be aware of?

      By Bebygirl01 · Posted

      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      My son newly diagnosed

      By Nicola McGuire · Posted

      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Celiac pain relief

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Karmmacalling
      Celiac pain relief

      By Karmmacalling · Posted

      I was born with celiac disease im 20 years old. And I've been gluten free my whole life. Yes my diet is 100 percent gluten free and no i don't eat at restaurants at all. I got glutened by a chips that was marked as gluten free but it wasn't the company said the packaging was old and the recipe was new. 
    • Scott Adams
      My son newly diagnosed

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, the biggest source of cross-contamination would be eating our in restaurants--even ones that have a gluten-free menu. If your son was just recently diagnosed I'd recommend trying not to eat out during his healing period, which could last up to a year or more, depending on how much villi damage he had.
×
×
  • Create New...