Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Those Of You On A gluten-free Diet And Retested


Worriedtodeath

Recommended Posts

Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

HI!

I


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Forgot to say that the Gluten-free Casein-free diet has been a miracle and that she has had the greatest height AND weigth increase in over a year according to the ped. THe diet is working and working great. Hubby and the ped would like a REASON now as to WHY and one that can be confirmed and duplicated and you know how scientists are. There is always a reason and that reason should be reproduced without fail. I say that is a pipe dream with this disease and unobtainable.

Thanks

Stacie

gfp Enthusiast
Hubby is just concerned that we are missing what really caused her to be sick and that perhaps gluten really wasn
Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

That's what I've tried to explain to hubby. If it is something else, then wouldn't it still be here somewhere??? Wouldn't we still have tummy issues or something to indicate that gluten isn't the cause? You don't remove gluten, have a 100% improvement and no other issues at all and it not be gluten. That's why I thought of the panel test. If other drs use it somehow then maybe we can too. I know our gi won't so I have to find someone else for the ped to listen to. OR deal with this everytime we go to the ped.

gfp Enthusiast

The problem is this can go on forever.

There are plenty of biopsy positive people who got told they would "grow out of it" ...

Baby has had 2 panels one in the very beginning that was ridiculously low and the other when on wheat 80 days that was higher but still not anywhere close to positive numbers. Her very old school gi says you should have IGG and IGA and ttg readings
Worriedtodeath Enthusiast

Good Lord that is horrible! I would never be able to do that. CC alone should be enough to let you know you still have a problem or at least with us it does. I just wish I had something with what we all ready have that could be of use somehow. I did discover my old upper and lower gi's presented with what now would be considered early Celiac's but way back in the dark ages no one took samples and no one had ever heard of gluten to make that dx.

Hopefully someone will begin develop a new "normal" for babies in those biopsies.

Thanks

Stacie

kbtoyssni Contributor

You'd have to feed that kid gluten for a looonnnngg time to hope to get a positive now. Like a year or two??? It's stupid to make anyone sick for a long period of time just for an official test. Especially a kid who is still growing and developing right now. You could try enterolab testing - that's still good for up to a year after going gluten-free. Otherwise you could do a gene test - it won't confirm or eliminate celiac, but if she does have one of the known genes, maybe that's enough to convince your husband?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



aaron&sam Rookie

This is what I think based on my personal experiences!

I would continue with your daughter's gluten-free diet! Her growth and development depend on her body's ability to absorb nutrients, if she happy, healthy and growing normally than you should not change anything! Maybe at another time in her life when growth and development are not so critical, you could investigate finding an official diagnosis!

My children have growth delay problems and I know that they would be sooooo much healthier if we had just known about Celiac disease about ten years ago!

gfp Enthusiast
You'd have to feed that kid gluten for a looonnnngg time to hope to get a positive now. Like a year or two??? It's stupid to make anyone sick for a long period of time just for an official test. Especially a kid who is still growing and developing right now. You could try enterolab testing - that's still good for up to a year after going gluten-free. Otherwise you could do a gene test - it won't confirm or eliminate celiac, but if she does have one of the known genes, maybe that's enough to convince your husband?

It seems to methat since babies are growing so quickly they repair much more quickly. As we get older our repair system slows down but for a baby the damage may repair as fast as it is made. This means the biopsy is much more tricky since the villi are repairing as fast as they are damaged and its much more tricky (need more luck) to find them damaged.. . This doesn't mean however damage is not being done.

As kbtoyssni say's this is such a critical time ... whymes about and take risks?

Takala Enthusiast

Yeah, I "know" how scientists are. <_<

In science, one observes a condition.

One comes up with a hypothesis as to what could be the cause of the condition.

The hypothesis is based on observations of other things

The hypothesis is tested out by experimenting

The results are noted

If the hypothesis is correct, the testing situation shows that changing something A has result B

If the hypotheis is not correct, the testing situation shows that changing something A has had no change

(there is a margin of error or a tolerance of + or - , but we won't go into that detail much now )

It is important for the other variables not to change during the experimental testing

it is important to document the changes that were observed

If it were just a scientific test, then the results should be able to be documented in other situations, if the test was being used to prove a theory

If the theory is already proven, and the results documented, them running the test again trying to disprove the observed result, or verify the result further, is okay if you're talking about scientific inquiry for the sake of research but really rather stupid if you're talking about the health status of a very small child.

go back to, it is important to document the changes that were observed.

Sounds like somebody missed that part, so I'd be asking him what his "issues" are.

The doctors just exist to run tests, and he's stuck in that rut of trying to generate revenues by ordering tests over and over again. Whether or not he is capable of making a correct diagnosis will not make your child have or not have a gluten sensitivity, the two things are not cause and effect no matter what. Gluten sensitivity is not the same thing as full blown Celiac. It takes different individuals different amounts of time to develop full blown auto immune disease from the time of initial exposure to wheat, rye, and barley glutens. This is because of many factors, such as their genes, enviroment, triggering infections, exposures, type of diet consumed, etc.

Your child is only 2.

Some people go for decades before their symptoms become acute enough for test results to show antibodies and damaged intestines.

It's been decades since I learned this "science" stuff and I just typed it all down from memory, so I may have not listed it in the perfectly correct jargon, but you get the idea.

There is one more thing to note. The current treatment, just eliminating gluten from the diet, has absolutely no harmful side effects whatsoever, other than the nuisance factor in terms of interacting with others in public. That and having to be careful in the home of cross contamination.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,131
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Itsabit
    Newest Member
    Itsabit
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Keep us posted and let us know the results of the biopsy. Your case is atypical in a way in that you have this high DGP-IGA but normal TTG-IGA so knowing how it turns out will give us more data for similar situations that may be posted in the future. 
    • Skg414228
      Fair enough! I very easily could have misread somewhere. Celiac is very confusing lol but I should know in a little over a month what the final verdict is. Just thought chatting with people smarter than myself would get me in the right mindset. I just thought that DGP IGA was pretty high compared to some stuff I had seen and figured someone on here would be more willing to say it is more than likely celiac instead of my doctor who is trying to be less direct. She did finally say she believes it is celiac but wanted to confirm with the biopsy. I did figure it wouldn't hurt seeing what other people said too just because not all doctors are the best. I think mine is actually pretty good from what I have seen but I don't know what I don't know lol. Sorry lot of rambling here just trying to get every thought out. Thanks again!
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
×
×
  • Create New...