Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Disease And Chemotherapy


InsaneMomTo3Kids

Recommended Posts

InsaneMomTo3Kids Newbie

My husband was diagnosed with lung cancer in Sept. 2007. He ended his chemo and radiation treatments in December 2007 and is now cancer free. In February he began to have celiac disease symptoms (bloating, vomitting, etc.) even though we had no idea what was causing these symptoms. The oncologist said it wasn't his cancer treatment, but didn't know what it was. He then saw a Gastrologist and had the test that was a scope down his throat and found that he had celiac damage and was then diagnosed. My question is: could the chemo have destroyed whatever it was that made him have Celiac disease or is it just a coincidence?

Thanks for the help,

Michele


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Usually, if somebody has the tendency towards celiac disease, it needs a trigger to activate those genes into full-blown celiac disease (like illness, accident, pregnancy, severe stress). The chemo could well have been that trigger, despite of what the doctor says.

InsaneMomTo3Kids Newbie

We also believe that the chemo and stress probably triggered his Celiac to come to the surface and rear it's ugly head.

Thanks for your reply,

Michele

cruelshoes Enthusiast

Celiac generally consists of 3 things:

1) Genetic Predisposition

2) Exposure to Gluten

3) Trigger event(s) - a period of stress, an illness, pregnancy, etc.

Your husband already had 1 and 2, and the cancer treatment created the third. Chemo and radiation were also the trigger for my celiac. I had 2 years of chemo and several months of radiation for Rhabdomyosarcoma when I was a teenager. My symptoms started then, and did not stop for 18 years until I was diagnosed. I am glad your husband did not have to suffer for many years before being diagnosed.

Hope this helps.

InsaneMomTo3Kids Newbie

I'm sorry to hear that you also had to walk the path of cancer, but it looks like you won the battle....Congrats!!

It's reassuring to hear of someone else that had their celiac triggered due to chemo/radiation. Now we don't feel like we're going crazy. Will he ever "out grow" the celiac symptoms, or will he always have to eat gluten-free?

Thanks,

Michele

cruelshoes Enthusiast

Celiac is a life long condition. There is currently no "cure" aside from the gluten free diet. Several drugs are being tested now, but even those do not promise to allow us to be able to eat gluten with impunity. They are probably only going to be a safety net in case of accidental cross contamination. You husband is going to need to be 100% gluten free for life to stop the autoimmune response from happening and to heal from the damage that has already occurred.

BTW - I also know another woman who just finished her chemo for breast cancer and a month later got a celiac diagnosis. Seems chemo as a trigger is more common than your husband's oncologist thought.

Glad to hear your husband is in remission. Please let us know how we can help you on this new journey.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,131
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Itsabit
    Newest Member
    Itsabit
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Keep us posted and let us know the results of the biopsy. Your case is atypical in a way in that you have this high DGP-IGA but normal TTG-IGA so knowing how it turns out will give us more data for similar situations that may be posted in the future. 
    • Skg414228
      Fair enough! I very easily could have misread somewhere. Celiac is very confusing lol but I should know in a little over a month what the final verdict is. Just thought chatting with people smarter than myself would get me in the right mindset. I just thought that DGP IGA was pretty high compared to some stuff I had seen and figured someone on here would be more willing to say it is more than likely celiac instead of my doctor who is trying to be less direct. She did finally say she believes it is celiac but wanted to confirm with the biopsy. I did figure it wouldn't hurt seeing what other people said too just because not all doctors are the best. I think mine is actually pretty good from what I have seen but I don't know what I don't know lol. Sorry lot of rambling here just trying to get every thought out. Thanks again!
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
×
×
  • Create New...