Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is It Really Gluten Free?


LuvMoosic4life

Recommended Posts

LuvMoosic4life Collaborator

I have been visiting the organic isle in Tops quite a bit now and have been noticing new gluten free products every so often. The thing that bothers me is many products will clearly label "gluten free" in big letters on the front, but then when you read the ingredients list, at the end it states "produced in a facility that also produces products containg wheat, soy, nuts...ect.....

do these factories have specific section for producing gluten free products? and I wonder if these products are really gluten free. I dont buy them b/c I am unsure. I just stick to products produced in a 100% gluten free environment.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest j_mommy

I do eat them! Personal choice, if they bother me I won't eat them again. I also call company's and find out what the manufactoring process is(ie: seperate line ect).

Company's put that on as a curtousy....how many company's are doing the same thing but not printing it on their packages? More than you think.

psawyer Proficient

As previously stated by j_mommy, any statement about shared facilities or shared equipment is totally voluntary. If you see it, it is probably true. If you don't see it, it may still be true.

Unless your home is completely free of all products containing gluten, it is a "shared facility" and your dishes and cutlery are likely "shared equipment."

You must make your own decision. In general, I eat these products.

GlutenGalAZ Enthusiast

I purchase foods that has that type of label note. If I don't feel well after eating it then I don't eat that food anymore and am more careful with other foods that company makes.

Some companies run their gluten free foods first then process other foods that contain wheat, nuts etc. Other companies clean their processing lines when they are going to do gluten free foods.

But yes, like previously said -- it is a personal choice if you feel comfortable or not with this type of labeling.

gfp Enthusiast

It probably depends on each company and also product.

A lot of chance might be involved, if they share lines then if you get one of the first 'gluten-free' products after running gluten or the last ...

As this is voluntary I tend to think of it as a good sign and if that company has other products not made in shared faciltities I tend to trust it a bit more than another company that doesn't say.

What are the other products etc.? If its flour then it is airborne... if its soy sauce then its not so less likely to jump across lines.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - hmkr replied to hmkr's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Celiac Test Results - Thoughts?

    2. - trents replied to hmkr's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Celiac Test Results - Thoughts?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to hmkr's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Celiac Test Results - Thoughts?

    4. - hmkr posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Celiac Test Results - Thoughts?

    5. - John Scott commented on dixonpete's blog entry in Pete Dixon
      5

      A video with researcher William Parker about Helminthic Therapy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,813
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    hmkr
    Newest Member
    hmkr
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • hmkr
      The IGA tests 5 years ago were: Transglutaminase IGA (EMY IGA) (CENT-tTG), <2 Immunoglobulin A (CENT-IGA), 246 IgA Quantitative was done last month, that was 261. Is that the one you mean?  
    • trents
      When you say a GI doc did an IGA five years ago and it was negative, which IGA measure do you speak of. There are several possibilities. Do you refer to the tTG-IGA? Have you had a total IGA test done? It isn't a test for celiac per se but can establish whether or not you are IGA deficient. If you are IGA deficient, it will drive individual IGA test scores down and can result in false positives. The tTG-IGA should always be accompanied by a total IGA test. When people are IGA deficient and actually do have celiac disease we often see it detected by the IGG tests. The same can be said if they have been skimping on gluten previous to the blood draw and, IMO, negatives in the IGA test spectrum with positives in the IGG spectrum can also point to NCGS or NCGS transitioning to celiac.
    • Scott Adams
      This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate. I agree that if your biopsy ends up negative, that you still may need to be gluten-free, as you could be in the non-celiac gluten sensitivity area. Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS. Be sure to eat lots of gluten daily until your endoscopy, otherwise you could get false negative results.    
    • hmkr
      I had several celiac blood tests done at a rheumatologist last month. I've had many possible symptoms over the last 23 years, including GERD/LPR, constipation, and recently joint stiffness and pain in my hands. It all started during my first pregnancy. 1/160 ANA back then as well as now with no autoimmune diagnosis. I've had undiagnosed high fevers, swollen lymphs nodes, ear pain, miscarriages, to name just a few more symptoms. I can't help but be upset at the many doctors I've been to that have missed this. A GI doctor only did the IgA 5 years ago, which was negative then too, and didn't do a biopsy as a result during an endoscopy shortly after. Deaminated Gliadin IgG Antibody test was 90, >15 being abnormal.   Deaminated Gliadin IgA Antibody, negative Tissue Transglutaminase IgG Antibody, negative Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibody, negative I'm scheduled for a biopsy at the end of January. The new GI doctor thinks if not celiac, I will still need to be gluten free the rest of my life due to the antibodies my body is producing. I feel like it's got to be celiac. I've been consuming gluten every day to prepare for this test. It can't come soon enough.  Thoughts on that IgG being positive and the others negative? I haven't gotten a clear explanation for that yet. Thanks in advance for any input!! 
    • Kiwifruit
      That’s good to know. Might be time to head back to my gastrointestinal doctor then.
×
×
  • Create New...