Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lactaid Becoming Less Effective?


Sweetfudge

Recommended Posts

Sweetfudge Community Regular

i've been using lactaid fast act pretty regularly over the last couple months and wonder if i could build up an immunity to it or something? i feel like it's not working as well as it used to :( anyone have any thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

you can't build up an immunity - it's the enzyme that breaks up the milk sugar, so it's doing the work that your own enzymes would do if you produced those enzymes. but you may find that you need to increase the dosage if your body is producing less and less of your own enzyme (which can happen naturally in people as they age or in lactose-intolerant populations, which is most of them, regardless of your use of lactaid). or, it could be a developing issue with casein. one interesting note is that the body will produce less lactase when it needs less, so if it's exposed to less milk products, it will produce less of it (hence, you can have induced lactose intolerance, but it generally goes away fairly quickly once dairy is reintroduced regularly).

debmidge Rising Star

I am severely lactose intolerant....I am from a "lactose-intolerant" population.

I have been using Lactaid since it first came out 20 years ago. When it first came out it was a liquid and you dropped the enzyme into the milk carton, shook it up and waited 24 hrs for the enzyme to work. I wish they made both the drops and the pills as the drops were excellent to put into canned milk or heavy cream; lactose free canned milk or heavy cream products are still unavailable.

Anyway, I find the pills to be "pot-shot" - will work Ok, then sometimes barely work. Many foods require more than the amount of pills shown on the label.

There are some foods which no amount of Lactaid will help 100% - like cream soups, cream sauces, natural ice creams, whipped cream desserts, cheesecakes, macaroni & cheese, cream cheese and dips, yogurt, cottage cheese, items such as Cozy Shack puddings, anything with calcium lactate in it (that's why I avoid foods fortified with calcium), "pink" sauces, Risotta, egg nog, canned milk.

I've learned that the "harder" the cheese, the less lactose is in it: for example: grated cheese has lower lactose than cottage cheese.

I was found to have lactose intolerance when I was 21 (I am now 51) and as a teen and young adult I always ate dairy, drank milk regularly, etc. and I continued doing so until I was doubled over in pain every day on a regular basis.

My experience has been that despite using the theory that "that the body will produce less lactase when it needs less, so if it's exposed to less milk products, it will produce less of it (hence, you can have induced lactose intolerance, but it generally goes away fairly quickly once dairy is reintroduced regularly" as described by tarnalberry, did not work.

Unknowingly, I still kept it up as I didn't know what the gastro problem was (thought I had IBS/colitis). I still lived at home and one day my Mom and I were talking about it (she confronted me as she thought I was pregnant due to these symptoms!) and she mentioned that it could be diary, which I stopped having then and found relief. I used to drink a half pint of milk every day with my lunch - even at age 21 when I was working. My co-workers used to make fun of me - but I didn't want osteoporosis.

Yes, I reintroduced dairy numerous times using the above theory and it didn't work; over the past 30 years I tried to break the lactaid cycle using this theory and was always disappointed (and full of gas and diarrhea).

I would recommend trying to go back to diary llike tarnalberry pointed out because everyone is different and just because it didn't work out for me won't mean that it won't reverse itself for you (especially since your lactose intolerance may be temporary due to celiac). My experience is not the "be all" and "end all" but for me it's obviously permanent. But I have to say that my heritage (Italian) is known for being lactose intolerant, however they cook a lot of foods with dairy/cheese in it and I am the only child out of 4 which has this problem - my Italian parents and grandparents didn't have lactose intolerance (the other side is Scott/German/English/Irish). Go figure....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,159
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Greymo
    Newest Member
    Greymo
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.