Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Histamine Testing


fkewatson

Recommended Posts

fkewatson Rookie

Hi - I've really been trying to find something re: this topic in the archives and while I'm learning a lot about histamine - I'm not find the answer to this question:

My son (4 years old) had some intradermal allergy testing recently. The reaction to the histamine injection was huge - weal was about 4-5 mm and the redness around the weal was about 4 inches in diameter. The doc looked at it and said, "that could be a lot of his problem".

What does this huge reaction to histamine mean? That he is sensitive histamine vs that he harbors high histamine levels? Or that BECAUSE he harbors high histamine levels he IS sensitive? He is also allergic to dairy, egg white, peanut and wheat as well as having genetic profile for being gluten intolerant (double whammy on the wheat/gluten).

Definitely going the route of poor liver/detox function and leaky gut. He has candida overgrowth as well but is responding nicely to nystatin and diet.

But this histamine thing has caught me off-guard. Limiting his diet further to do a low histamine version will be rather challenging, but if it is necessary to help reduce inflammation, we'll do it.

He definitely has some of the symptoms of histamine sensitivity/high histamine levels - high activity level, implusive, over-active fight/flight/fright response, hard to keep him focused.

Any info is appreciated!

Katie


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jayhawkmom Enthusiast

I'm a bit confused. The histamine is supposed to be huge. The control is supposed to be unremarkable. If the histamine wasn't huge, it would be the sign of a flawed test.

I've had intradermal allergy testing done, and my histamine was also "huge" as were those of my children. They inject histamine directly under the skin, it's *supposed* to react.

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something... if so, my apologies.

  • 2 weeks later...
huevo-no-bueno Apprentice
I'm a bit confused. The histamine is supposed to be huge. The control is supposed to be unremarkable. If the histamine wasn't huge, it would be the sign of a flawed test.

I've had intradermal allergy testing done, and my histamine was also "huge" as were those of my children. They inject histamine directly under the skin, it's *supposed* to react.

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something... if so, my apologies.

I had this test done, and no matter how small the histamine concentration was, I reacted and felt awful. I felt so bad, I didn't go back for the treatment. They can't treat me for gluten intolerance this way, only the "classic" food allergy I have to eggs, so I just made the decision to just accept the allergy and move on with my life. I hope this post isn't too discouraging for anyone!

jerseyangel Proficient
I'm a bit confused. The histamine is supposed to be huge. The control is supposed to be unremarkable. If the histamine wasn't huge, it would be the sign of a flawed test.

I've had intradermal allergy testing done, and my histamine was also "huge" as were those of my children. They inject histamine directly under the skin, it's *supposed* to react.

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something... if so, my apologies.

Yes, this is what happened to me, too. The histamine on me got big and itched like crazy the whole day after the test. I asked the allergist about it before I left the office and he said it was normal.

  • 5 months later...
Muriel Harvey Newbie

I think it means you have high levels of histiamine in your blood. So are generally allergic. I think there are natural supplements you can take to help this.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,817
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Terry49
    Newest Member
    Terry49
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @Kiwifruit, I agree further testing is needed.  Disaccharidase deficiency is a symptom of Celiac disease.   On your test results, this line  "IgA: 0.9 g/l (norm 0.8 - 4.0)" is referring to Total IgA and it's very low.  People with low or deficient Total IgA should also have DGP IgG test done.  Low Total IgA means you are making low levels of tTg  IgA as well, leading to false negatives or "weak positives".  Maybe a DNA test for known Celiac genes.   Anemia, diabetes, and thiamine deficiency can cause test results like these.  Get checked for B12 deficiency anemia and have your iron (ferritin) checked.  Vitamin D deficiency is common, too.   Might be time to find a gastrointestinal doctor who is more familiar with diagnosing Celiac Disease.   Best wishes on your journey!  Please keep us posted on your progress.  
    • trents
      Yes, there is a trend in the medical community to forego the endoscopy/biopsy and grant an official celiac diagnosis based on high tTG-IGA antibody scores alone. This trend started in the UK and is spreading to the USA medical community. And yes, 5-10x the normal level is what I have been seeing as the threshold as well. Here is the relevant section dealing from the article above dealing with the importance of the total IGA test being ordered. See the embedded attachment.
    • hmkr
      Ok, interesting. Not what I was thinking that meant. I'm reading the article and trying to understand. I see this “According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy” My IgG is 90, which is 6 times. So to me that means it's highly likely I do have it. 
    • trents
      It just means you aren't IGA deficient, i.e., that IGA deficiency cannot have given you artificially low scores in the individual IGA celiac antibody tests. This is explained in the article Scott linked above.
    • hmkr
      Normal range: 70 - 400 mg/dL, a little above middle of the range. So what does that mean? Thank you! I will check out that page you linked. Appreciate it! 
×
×
  • Create New...