Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can Celiac Bloodwork Change?

momto1

Recommended Posts

momto1 Newbie
momto1
Posted

Hi, my husband has celiac, and we kept my daughter gluten-free til about 12 months of age. Then around age 2, Dr did the bloodwork that came out completely negative (I was told) We have changed pediatricians since then, and my current dr doesn't have those records.

Now, my daughter is a very healthy 9 year old, but has been having sharp tummy pains off and on = usually middle of the day, sometimes in her back she says, maybe lasting 1-3 minutes.

So, my question is - if the bloodwork came out negative at age 2, would that change to now? Doesn't it check for genetic predisposition?

Current dr is going to order new bloodwork just to be sure.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


lizard00 Enthusiast
lizard00
Posted

Hello and welcome!

Depending on what type of tests they ran on your daughter, yes they can change. At two years old, blood tests are often inaccurate. If they did a genetic test, that would show whether she carried the genetic marker for Celiac, but many people carry the marker and do not ever develop Celiac.

If they only did blood tests, having her retested was a great idea. It takes time for the intestinal damage to occur to the point that it shows up on the tests if, in fact, she does have Celiac.

Please stick around and make yourself at home. Ask any questions; there are so many people here with so many different stories that can really be a great deal of support.

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

blood work can change for a number of reasons. here are four that apply to your case:

1. tests in children under two are unreliable and generate false negatives at a higher than normal rate

2. celiac isn't "on" from birth - it can develop at any age; tests before that will be negative, after will be positive

3. tests from different labs use different reference ranges; the same result may show positive for some labs, negative for others

4. it may take time for enough damage to occur for the antibodies that are usually tested for (they don't usually do genetic tests) to show up in the blood stream

momto1 Newbie
momto1
Posted
  • Author

WOW, just found the ped that ran the original results and faxed them to me.

Endomysial Antibioties, IgH - None Det

Endomysial Antibiodies, IgA - None Det

Transglutiminase IGA Autoantibiodies = < 10 U/ML (Reference Range <10)

Endomysial Antiboidies, IgA G None Det

Anyone care to interpret for me?!?!?!

THANKS SO MUCH for all your input!

momto1 Newbie
momto1
Posted
  • Author

celiac isn't "on" from birth - it can develop at any age; tests before that will be negative, after will be positive

So does this mean she should be tested yearly? (Providing that this time we come back with negative results?)

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted

If she has suspicious symptoms, absolutely. Otherwise, probably not. She may never develop Celiac, and stressing about something that may never happen isn't good for you either.

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

Obviously, your daughter has developed suspicious symptoms. Sharp stomach pains sure aren't normal! If her tests come back negative, I would have her tested with Open Original Shared Link, as their tests will detect antibodies BEFORE the villi are pretty much destroyed, while the blood tests are only accurate when there is lots of villi damage already.

And, of course, there is always the most accurate test of them all, which is trying the gluten-free diet to see if those stomach problems go away.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Worriedtodeath Enthusiast
Worriedtodeath
Posted

How old was she again when tested? Did they run a total iga count? IF she is IGA deficient, then some of the Celiac tests will come back negative no matter what since they depend on IgA numbers. I'm wondering why nothing was detected. Even my daughter's .1 was recorded on her lab results. But if this was several years ago as I think I read, then that may be all they did then. Our latest results had the following tests run

Anti-gliadin IgG ELISA (AGA IgG)

Anti-gliadin IgA ELISA (AGA IgA)

Anti-human Tissue Transglutaminase Iga Elisa (TTG IgA)

Anti-Endomysial IgA IFA (EMA IgA)

TOtal Serum IgA by NEphelometry (TOTAL IgA)

We had one run 4 days off of wheat and one run 68 days on wheat. The numbers went up some. We will have another run at some point to see if they go down.

i was told to make sure the lab used was Prometheus since they do a lot of this type of testing. And to make sure you get a total Iga count to make sure that is normal.

Stacie

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

Well if you keep them gluten free and then get bloodwork done then the it is likely that the bloodwork will show up negative. That is the way they keep track of how celiacs are doing with their diet. Like when I had blood tests done that showed positive they checked me after being gluten free for 6 months and it came back negative and thats the way they monitor compliance because not everyone can tell from symptoms.

momto1 Newbie
momto1
Posted
  • Author

I checked back at the records. We kept her gluten-free till about 10 months. Her weight was dropping a little bit and the dr was worried that she wasn't getting enough to eat. Knowing that a gluten-free diet would not show up on a bloodtest, we put her on reg food, and at 13 months did the bloodwork. (4 months on reg food)

I repeatedly asked the pediatrician over the years if the test needed to be re-done, and every one told me NO, that bloodwork doesn't change.

Now, Im mad at myself for not persuing it further.

I only have results from those 3 tests done in 2000. The "interpretative data" sasy - Endomysial antiboides are screened using an ELISA tissue transglutiminase (tTg) assay. All samples wich are positivtitered by IFA. The endomysial antigen has been identified protien cross-linking enzyme known as tissue transglutimines

aikiducky Apprentice
aikiducky
Posted

Here in Holland I think at least some doctors recommend that family members be tested every five years or so, unless they have suspicious symptoms and should be tested sooner. Why don't you just request the blood tests now, just in case?

Pauliina

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

Here in the US , they only "recognize" two Celiac genes--but in Europe, I think they recognize 7 genes as being associated with celiac. Definitely something to keep in mind!

I totally agree that sharp tummy pains are NOT normal. Something is causing them.

My kids' occasional tummy pains disappeared on a gluten-lite diet (I was gluten-free, and didn't want to cook 2 dinners or breakfasts, so they only had gluten in their school lunches)--that clued me in to the need to have them go totally gluten-free.

brill Newbie
brill
Posted

Even though your husband is Ceoliac, it could be possible that your daughter isn't ceoliac... She still may however be Gluten Intolerant..

There is only a small number of people that are ceoliac...

I am Ceoliac, but my sister is only Gluten Intolerant...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,355
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Nebulae77
    Newest Member
    Nebulae77
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.1k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Lynnard
      Waiting on biopsy results but wanted opinion on bloodwork

      By Lynnard · Posted

      Thank you - that makes perfect sense and I understand. celiac disease is an autoimmune disease which will cause further damage while gluten sensitivity is different. Based on my symptoms and bloodwork, I am almost certain I have celiac disease.  I kind of hate to hope for a positive biopsy but a negative one would be frustrating for sure. Regardless, I have done a lot of research on gluten-free diet and am prepared to begin a new lifestyle journey - with a lot of questions along the way.  I appreciate your information and advice! 
    • trents
      Waiting on biopsy results but wanted opinion on bloodwork

      By trents · Posted

      Let's talk about terminology for the sake eliminating (as much as possible) confusion. Unfortunately, the terms "gluten sensitive" and "gluten intolerant" have, historically, been used indiscriminately. There are two primary categories of gluten disorders whose "official" terms are 1. celiac disease and 2. Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or NCGS for short.  I believe there is an evolution toward using the term "gluten intolerance" to refer to celiac disease and "gluten sensitive" to refer to NCGS. I say that because the words "gluten sensitivity" are actually found in the official medical term for the non celiac medical disorder involving gluten. Does that make sense? The difference between celiac disease and NCGS is that celiac disease causes inflammation in the small bowel lining and (over time) does damage to it so that it becomes inefficient in absorbing nutrients from what we eat. This is the area of the intestinal track where all of our nutrients are absorbed. Of course, this can lead to any number of other medical problems. NCGS, on the other hand, does not cause inflammation or damage to the lining of the small bowel and therefore does not produce the antibodies that celiac disease antibody tests look for. Neither will NCGS, therefore, produce a positive biopsy result. NCGS and celiac disease, however share many of the same symptoms in the area of GI distress and NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease. There is, at the present time, no defining test for NCGS so an NCGS diagnosis is arrived at by first eliminating celiac disease for which we do have tests for. Having said that, some experts believe that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.  Yes, you are correct in stating that both conditions require a gluten free diet.  So, in the absence of official testing for celiac disease (and official testing done under the proper conditions) a person who is experiencing distress when consuming gluten cannot be certain whether they are dealing with celiac disease or NCGS. Not to have an official diagnosis of celiac disease while actually having the condition makes it difficult for some folks to stay on the gluten free bandwagon. It's just the psychology of the situation and wanting to rationalize away a very inconvenient and socially isolating medical condition.
    • Lynnard
      Waiting on biopsy results but wanted opinion on bloodwork

      By Lynnard · Posted

      Thank you!  This is super helpful and confirms everything I have read. I was definitely eating lots of gluten before both testing and endoscopy. If the biopsies do come back negative, I'm wondering how conclusion/distinction is made between celiac and gluten intolerance is made.  Or does it matter because presumably recommendation of gluten-free diet will be the protocol??  
    • trents
      Weak positive blood test and marsh type 1

      By trents · Posted

      You are welcome! We frequently get similar comments. Knowledge about celiac disease in the medical community at large is, unfortunately, still significantly lacking. Sometimes docs give what are obviously bum steers or just fail to give any steering at all and leave their patients just hanging out there on a limb. GI docs seem to have better knowledge but typically fail to be helpful when it comes to things like assisting their patients in grasping how to get started on gluten free eating. The other thing that, to me at least, seems to be coming to the forefront are the "tweener" cases where someone seems to be on the cusp of developing celiac disease but kind of crossing back and forth over that line. Their testing is inconsistent and inconclusive and their symptoms may come and go. We like to think in definite categorical terms but real life isn't always that way.
    • Rogol72
      How to navigate living with dermatitis herpetiformis

      By Rogol72 · Posted

      Hey @Morgan Tiernan, Sounds just like my experience. I was diagnosed with dermatitis herpetiformis over 10 years ago. It appeared suddenly as a very itchy rash which looked like Eczema. When a steroid cream didn't clear it up, my Dermatologist (who had come across it before) suspected dermatitis herpetiformis and performed a skin biopsy which came back positive for dermatitis herpetiformis. The important thing is to get a definitive diagnosis of dermatitis herpetiformis. What you've described sounds like classic dermatitis herpetiformis though. Hopefully, your Dermatologist has come across dermatitis herpetiformis before and performs the skin biopsy correctly as trents mentioned. I've had the blisters on the knees, hips, forearms/elbows or anywhere that pressure is applied to the skin ... from clothing or otherwise. They itch like nothing on earth, and yes salt from sweat or soaps/shower gels will irritate a lot. I've been on Dapsone and it is very very effective at eliminating the dermatitis herpetiformis itch, and improved my quality of life in the early stages of getting on top of dermatitis herpetiformis while I adjusted to the gluten-free diet. But it does have various side effects as trents said. It can effect the red blood cells, lowering hemoglobin and can cause anemia, and requires regular blood monitoring whilst on it. You would need to consider it carefully with your Dermatologist if you do have dermatitis herpetiformis. Here's a very informative webinar from Coeliac Canada discussing everything dermatitis herpetiformis related.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAdmsNiyfOw I've also found this recent interview with a Dermatologist about dermatitis herpetiformis to be educational.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZnLeKutgUY Keep the chin up and keep advocating for yourself for a proper diagnosis. Though it sounds like you're on top of that already. Are you in the UK or Ireland? I'm curious because your surname is Irish. 
×
×
  • Create New...