Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Results


jenhb

Recommended Posts

jenhb Newbie

I just recieved my Enterolab results today and I was surprised that it didn't show any ongoing gluten sensitivity as I have had a dramatic postive response to a gluten-free diet. Horrible gas and cycles of diarreha and constipation have disappeared. My insomnia and depression are much, much better and I have been struggling with those issues for over 20 years. I have only been on the diet for about a month, but the one time I ate some gluten all of those symptoms came crashing back and it took about a week to feel better. In the end, it doesn't really matter what the tests say as I am determined to continue with the diet no matter what, but I am interested in any feedback other members have to offer.

Here are the results:

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 9 (Normal Range <10 Units)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 7 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score <300 Units (Normal Range <300 Units)

Fecal anti-casein (cow's milk) IgA antibody 7 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0602

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0603

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 1,1 (Subtype 6,6)

I have had bloodwork done and it was negative. My regular doctor did a celiac panel but apparently it did not include IGA. So my GI doctor wanted me to go back on gluten for three weeks and get that test done. At this point I don't think it is worth it as I have finally found something that makes me feel better for the first time in a year (I have struggled with all of these issues for a long time, but everything got much worse after I had a severe intestinal virus a year agao) and I am pretty sure the test would just come out negative anyway.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,

Jen


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mftnchn Explorer

My understanding is that your Enterolab results are all negative, and your gene type isn't the most common ones associated with celiac. There are some DQ1 folk here on this forum who have gluten sensitivity (and some diagnosed celiac) and get better on the diet. My impression is they tend to have more neurological symptoms than others do. So the depression fits here.

Your symptoms and dietary response are very similar to celiac. So regardless of the explanation you seem to be gluten sensitive for sure--and I think your plan is a sound one. Eventually probably there will be some research that will explain the reason.

nora-n Rookie

Hi, over at the braitalk and neurotalk forums there actuallay are some DQ1 and they are very sensitive to gluten.

And there are some diagnosed DQ1 out there too but not as may as DQ2 of course.

Ssome are here too.

Often those not having DQ2 or 8 will not show the typical severe villi damage, but they are just as bad from gluten, and even more sensitive to gluten.

3 weeks is probably not enough.

Note that Dr. Hadjivassiliou found that 20% og his gluten ataxia patients are DQ1. Just google his name and gluten or gliadin or something relevant. they have antigliadin antibodies and it goes right into the central nervous system.

nora

holiday16 Enthusiast

When my mother had her testing done her results were very similar except she does have a celiac gene. I called Enterolab and when you have a borderline negative they recommend that you try the diet to be sure since it's borderline. My mother did the diet for over a year and noticed no difference, but she really wasn't having symptoms anyway. In her case it is recommended that she go low gluten so she doesn't trigger it in the future. How you feel on the diet is the best indication when the results are borderline like that.

jenhb Newbie

Thanks for the info.!

I've actually been gluten free for about five weeks now... (except for one setback). I am committed to a six month trial to see if the changes I have noticed so far stick. Everything is not magically perfect, I still have some gas most days and low energy in the afternoon. But, I would say, on average, I have been at least 50%-80% better (depending on the day) since around the end of the second week. The fact that the weekly D episodes that I was having, at times, resulted in me having a BM accident on myself, are not currently occuring is positive reinforcement enough to deal with the diet. I guess if I am this sensitive to gluten with a borderline Enterolab antibody result, I would hate to see myself with a positive antibody response. So, I guess I will see what happens...

Thanks!

Jen

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,029
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ChrisJ25
    Newest Member
    ChrisJ25
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
    • Bebygirl01
      Perhaps you would still like to answer the questions I posed on this topic, because that is all I asked. I am curious to know the answers to those questions, I do not care about the background of Dr. Osborne as I am more aware of the situation than you are, and he is also one of the best known authors out there on Celiac disease. But did you even bother to read the three Research Papers I posted by NIH? You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant and not yet reacting to all glutens aka grains, but I AM one of those who react to ALL the glutens, and again, that is one of the two questions I originally posted on this matter. NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing. I started with the failed FDA explanation of what Gluten Free is and I stayed sick and got even sicker. It wasn't until I came across NIH's papers and went off all grains that I realized that in fact, I am Celiac and reacting to all the glutens. IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. Those who are just getting started with learning about grains etc., can take it easy by just being "grain free' and eating a lot of meat, vegetables, etc. or whole foods as God has intended, without buying so called gluten free garbage out there that is making them sick and the whole reason they are not better. I tried the stupid gluten free garbage and it didn't work, and that will make anyone want to give up, it is better to teach the entire truth and let the patient decide, rather than give them misinformation and lies.
    • Nicola McGuire
      Thank you so much I will speak to the doctor for dietician apt . Thank you for your advice Beth much appreciated 
    • Scott Adams
      Oh no, I'm sorry to hear about the accidental gluten! This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...