Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Pinned: Help! Negative Biopsy, What Is Wrong?


Heather359

Recommended Posts

Heather359 Newbie

Hi Everyone,

I am know here. My son for 6 years has been diagnosed with acid reflux. A year agao he was sent to a gastro specializist. He changed is reflux meds. It seemed to work but about 3 months ago he stated eating less and complaining that he belly hurts. Everytime he eats he is in the bathroom. I called the specialist and he had him come in for a scope. He wanted to look at the esaghugas but when he got in there he said that his intestance was a mess, no villi. He told me it was Celiac. He told me he took a biopsy and to call in a week and start a gluten free diet. Today I called and he had a negative biopsy. Can this happen? The nurse told me to continue the diet and they would do some bllod work next week. He is still complaining about his stomach but not as bad. Does it take time to heal? HELP?

Heather :(


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MELINE Enthusiast
Hi Everyone,

I am know here. My son for 6 years has been diagnosed with acid reflux. A year agao he was sent to a gastro specializist. He changed is reflux meds. It seemed to work but about 3 months ago he stated eating less and complaining that he belly hurts. Everytime he eats he is in the bathroom. I called the specialist and he had him come in for a scope. He wanted to look at the esaghugas but when he got in there he said that his intestance was a mess, no villi. He told me it was Celiac. He told me he took a biopsy and to call in a week and start a gluten free diet. Today I called and he had a negative biopsy. Can this happen? The nurse told me to continue the diet and they would do some bllod work next week. He is still complaining about his stomach but not as bad. Does it take time to heal? HELP?

Heather :(

Hello and welcome!

sometimes a biopsy could be negative because it is not done like it should be. I've read that there can be a false negative because the doctor took samples from the wrong parts of the intestine (I don't have the intention to accuse your doctor. Just told you what I've read..). For sure a positive biopsy is positive and a negative is nothing. I am not a doctor so I don't know if there are other diseases that destroy the villy....But celiac definately makes that damage.

And here are the happy news. If your little boy is celiac, when he starts the gluten-free diet his villy will be brand new! Almost every patient responds to the gluten-free diet, and the good thing about celiac is that the whole damage is like it never happened. This can take some time. For me it was 3 weeks until I started feeling great.Now after 7 monts my villy is SUPER. For others it was months or year or days....But the pain stops almost right away. Any way I am not a doctor, I am just trying to write down some experiences or thoughts. Maybe he is lactose intolerant, have you checked that?

Hope this helped you a little bit.....I wish your son will get better soon.

Meline

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

Welcome aboard!

It took many of us months to figure out this diet completely, Perhaps your son's diet still includes hidden gluten? Many cereals, soy sauces, deli tuna salads, ice creams, rice cakes, etc. contain gluten.

ALso, if he has no villi, he should avoid all milk products until his intestines heal, which can be several months. The villi are what produce lactase, which is what breaks down lactose. And many celiacs react to casein (the protein in milk) rather than lactose, and have to avoid milk, period.

The biopsy is considered the gold standard of celiac diagnosis--but keep in mind they only take a few 1/4" samples out of 22 feet of intestine. Villi damage is often patchy, and he just might have biopsied a bunch of unaffected areas!

I would keep him gluten-free and milk-product-free, (not lite, but absolutely free) and see if he does feel better.

That said, there are other things that can cause villi damage, such as severe bacterial infections, and even Lyme disease. There are a couple of threads on this board with a lot of info on things like Lyme Disease, mercury toxicity (from vaccines and dental amalgams, and other sources), candida infections, and other overwhelming things. If your son does NOT get further relief from a really strict gluten-free diet (that also does not include gluten-free breads, cakes, cookies, etc. during the first few weeks until his tum heals, as those can be very harsh on a damaged tummy ), then you might have to keep searching for answers.

nora-n Rookie

Daughter had a negative biopsy too, after the doctor who did the scope could see typical changes when one is celiac, he even called the others over to see when doing the scope. Three samples were taken, and only one was looked at by the pathologist wh said it was negative. .......

She did get a diagnosis after all, because of all the symptoms and because she dramatically got better off gluten.

Doctor said pathologists are known to be idiots. (some of them)

nora

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,039
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Shadowseeker
    Newest Member
    Shadowseeker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @KRipple! Sorry to hear of all your husband's health problems. I can only imagine how anxious this makes you as when our spouse suffers we hurt right along with them. Can you post the results from the Celiac blood testing for us to look at? We would need the names of the tests run, the numeric results and (this is important) the reference ranges for each test used to establish high/low/negative/positive. Different labs use different rating scales so this is why I ask for this. There aren't industry standards. Has your husband seen any improvement from eliminating gluten from his diet? If your husband had any positive results from his celiac blood antibody testing, this is likely what triggered the consult with a  GI doc for an endoscopy. During the endoscopy, the GI doc will likely biopsy the lining of the small bowel lining to check for the damage caused by celiac disease. This would be for confirmation of the results of the blood tests and is considered the gold standard of celiac disease diagnosis. But here is some difficult information I have for you. If your husband has been gluten free already for months leading up to the endoscopy/biopsy, it will likely invalidate the biopsy and result in a false negative. Starting the gluten free diet now will allow the lining of the small bowel to begin healing and if enough healing takes place before the biopsy happens, there will be no damage to see. How far out is the endoscopy scheduled for? There still may be time for your husband to go back on gluten, what we call a "gluten challenge" to ensure valid test results.
    • kate g
      Ive read articles that there is stage 2 research being conducted for drugs that will limit damage to celiacs through cross contamination- how close are they to this will there be enough funding to create a mainstream drug? 
    • KRipple
      Hello, My husband has had issues with really bad diarreah for over nine months now. In mid November, he went to the doctor for what they thought was a bad cold, which two weeks later was diagnosed as bronchitis. A week later, in December, I had to take him back to urgent care and from there, to the emergency room cause his vitals were too low. They said he was having an Addisionan crisis and he spent five days in the ICU. Since my husband has Autoimmune Polyendocrine Syndrome Type II (type 1 diabetes, Addison's and Hashimoto's), I fought for a blood test to determine if he had Celiacs. Given the results of the test, he was told to go to a gastro for an endoscopy. It took two months to get his first appointment with the gastro. Still waiting for the endoscopy appointment. He stopped eating gluten in the hospital and has followed a gluten-free diet since. His diarreah continues to be as bad as before he stopped eating gluten. Still has a horrible cough that makes him hack. His energy is so depleted he pretty much goes to work, comes home and goes lie in bed. He is having issues regulating body temperature. He is barely eating (he's lost 20 pounds since mid-December). Body aches. Totally run down. He has been taking more prednisone lately to try to counter the symptoms.  Today, we went to his endo to discuss these things. She said to continue taking increased amount of prednisone (even though I explained that the increased dosage is only allowing him to do the bare minimum). According to the endo, this is all related to Celiacs. I am concerned because I know that both Celiacs and Addison's can have similar symptoms, but don't know if he would still be having these many symptoms (worsening, at that) related to the Celiac's after stopping gluten two months ago. If anyone in this group has a combination of Celiacs and Addison's, could you please share your experience? I am really concerned and am feeling frustrated. His primary care provider and endocrinologist don't seem to consider this serious enough to warrant prompt attention, and we'll see about the gastro.  Thanks.
    • cristiana
      Hi @Karmmacalling I'm very sorry to hear you are feeling so unwell.  Can you tell us exactly what sort of pain you are experiencing and where the pain is?  Is it your lower abdomen, upper abdomen etc?  Do you have any other symptoms? Cristiana
    • trents
      The NIH article you link actually supports what I have been trying to explain to you: "Celiac disease (celiac disease) is an autoimmune-mediated enteropathy triggered by dietary gluten in genetically prone individuals. The current treatment for celiac disease is a strict lifelong gluten-free diet. However, in some celiac disease patients following a strict gluten-free diet, the symptoms do not remit. These cases may be refractory celiac disease or due to gluten contamination; however, the lack of response could be related to other dietary ingredients, such as maize, which is one of the most common alternatives to wheat used in the gluten-free diet. In some celiac disease patients, as a rare event, peptides from maize prolamins could induce a celiac-like immune response by similar or alternative pathogenic mechanisms to those used by wheat gluten peptides. This is supported by several shared features between wheat and maize prolamins and by some experimental results. Given that gluten peptides induce an immune response of the intestinal mucosa both in vivo and in vitro, peptides from maize prolamins could also be tested to determine whether they also induce a cellular immune response. Hypothetically, maize prolamins could be harmful for a very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients, especially those that are non-responsive, and if it is confirmed, they should follow, in addition to a gluten-free, a maize-free diet." Notice that those for whom it is suggested to follow a maize-free diet are a "very limited subgroup of celiac disease patients". Please don't try to make your own experience normative for the entire celiac community.  Notice also that the last part of the concluding sentence in the paragraph does not equate a gluten-free diet with a maize-free diet, it actually puts them in juxtaposition to one another. In other words, they are different but for a "limited subgroup of celiac disease patients" they produce the same or a similar reaction. You refer to celiac reactions to cereal grain prolamins as "allergic" reactions and "food sensitivity". For instance, you say, "NIH sees all these grains as in opposition to celiacs, of which I am one and that is science, not any MD with a good memory who overprescribes medications that contain known food allergens in them, of which they have zero knowledge if the patient is in fact allergic to or not, since they failed to do simple 'food sensitivity' testing" and "IF a person wants to get well, they should be the one to determine what grains they are allergic to and what grains they want to leave out, not you. I need to remind you that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Neither allergy testing nor food sensitivity testing can be used to diagnose celiac disease. Allergy testing and food sensitivity testing cannot detect the antibodies produced by celiac disease in reaction to gluten ingestion.  You say of me, "You must be one of those who are only gluten intolerant . . ." Gluten intolerance is synonymous with celiac disease. You must be referring to gluten sensitivity or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). Actually, I have been officially diagnosed with celiac disease both by blood antibody testing and by endoscopy/positive biopsy. Reacting to all cereal grain prolamins does not define celiac disease. If you are intent on teaching the truth, please get it straight first.
×
×
  • Create New...