Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Nuts Cross Contamination?


Wakeboarder

Recommended Posts

Wakeboarder Apprentice

I know nuts are a good snack but I'm not sure where to buy them/ what brand to buy because I'm concerned about the potential for cross contamination wherever they are processed. I know you can just buy peanuts still in the shell to be safe but I want more of a variety of nuts. Plus, they're not so good for traveling because they make a mess. So I'm wondering what others have done to address this issue. Is there a particular brand of nuts that are processed in a way that reduces or eliminates cross contamination concern?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kenlove Rising Star

I know the mac nuts from hawaii are safe since we dont grow any other types here.

I'm always careful of walnuts since some are coated in wheat starch. never had problems with almonds or nuts in the shell.

Ken

I know nuts are a good snack but I'm not sure where to buy them/ what brand to buy because I'm concerned about the potential for cross contamination wherever they are processed. I know you can just buy peanuts still in the shell to be safe but I want more of a variety of nuts. Plus, they're not so good for traveling because they make a mess. So I'm wondering what others have done to address this issue. Is there a particular brand of nuts that are processed in a way that reduces or eliminates cross contamination concern?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,116
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    jpenni
    Newest Member
    jpenni
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...