Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

9yr Old Son's Bloodwork Still Positive After 1 Yr

GFM

Recommended Posts

GFM Apprentice
GFM
Posted

My 9yr old son was diagnosed a little over a year ago with Celiac. He has been gluten free since April 2007. I'm not an expert on the testing so I'll try my best to describe his results (Endomysial Antibody IgG+IgA was 1 in 20,480 pre diagnosis, 1 in 640 after 3 months gluten free, 1 in 320 after 7 months gluten free, 1 in 160 just recently after 13 months gluten free). He needs to be 1 in 2.5 in order to test negative, and I thought for sure he would be by now.

His doctor thinks that he may be getting hidden gluten from somewhere, but I can't figure out how. Our house is gluten free except for a loaf of bread and some snacks for my other son (which is kept in a separate area). I constantly read labels, call companies, and make all of our meals at home gluten free. We rarely eat out. I pack all of his school lunches and snacks. I trust my son when he says he does not share food or "cheat". He's very conscientious about being gluten free and certainly does not like having frequent blood tests that will stay frequent as long as he tests positive. I've checked the shampoo (Suave) and toothpaste (Crest). By the way, I have also gone gluten free with him and wash my hands before I touch anything that he will eat.

The doctor originally said that it could take a year after going gluten free for bloodwork to become negative. Has anyone experienced this taking longer than a year? It is encouraging that my son's numbers are still coming down, he no longer has stomach aches, and his growth is improving.

We were told to call the dietician who has a lot of experience working with Celiac patients. After asking me some questions, she couldn't identify any potential problems and said to continue as we are and maybe it's just taking him longer to heal. However, if anyone has any ideas, I would appreciate them since a do nothing approach doesn't sit well with me.

I can't think of anything different diet-wise from when his results dropped dramatically at the start of going gluten free. If he truly is still getting gluten then I would think it would be from something he gets on a regular basis (Singulair, Scooby Doo vitamins).

Thanks for reading such a long post and for any suggestions.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


aikiducky Apprentice
aikiducky
Posted

You know I agree with the dietitian. Clearly the antibodies have been dropping and continue to drop, I'd expect that if he kept getting gluten that they wouldn't keep getting lower or would even get higher again. So I really think it's a question of time.

I think generally both patients and doctors underestimate the time it really takes to heal from celiac damage...

Pauliina

GFM Apprentice
GFM
Posted
  • Author
You know I agree with the dietitian. Clearly the antibodies have been dropping and continue to drop, I'd expect that if he kept getting gluten that they wouldn't keep getting lower or would even get higher again. So I really think it's a question of time.

I think generally both patients and doctors underestimate the time it really takes to heal from celiac damage...

Pauliina

Thanks Pauliina. We'll keep at it. I think waiting is sometimes the hardest part.

aikiducky Apprentice
aikiducky
Posted

Ain't that the truth... :)

Pauliina

3,5 years gluten free, and couldn't have imagined the difference even a year ago...

  • 1 month later...
Jim K. Hale Newbie
Jim K. Hale
Posted
Thanks Pauliina. We'll keep at it. I think waiting is sometimes the hardest part.

Most definitely. It also depends on the amount of damage that was done before going on the gluten-free diet too. If his biopsy results were a Marsh III (showing total blunting), then it probably would take much longer to heal. The numbers are going down though ... that's good. My son is 9 as well, and his numbers (and mine) have been good since we went on a gluten-free diet in 2006, but it took about 6 months. And my IgA anti-gliadin antibodies are never right, but I KNOW I'm gluten-free. Anyway ...

I know that the peer temptations can be high, and even though he's not on taking in gluten, it's hard for kids to be able to say to other kids why they can't and why it doesn't make them "Different". I think you're in the Columbus area, so ... if he wanted to talk to my son about it, I'd be willing to arrange that. My son is living quite happily with it, as am I.

If you want to email me, my email is ilikecitrus @ gmail.com. I've got a bunch of info that I can suggest reading, and I have lots of recipe info and such as well.

oceangirl Collaborator
oceangirl
Posted

Hi.

I've been gluten-free for three years and my TTg JUST got into the normal range. I NEVER eat out, eat only whole foods I make myself and have a gluten-free house! I think for some it takes awhile. Now I am trying to ignore being tested for a time and check in on it in 6 months to a year just to see...

Good luck to you and your son. Keep the vigilance, though!

lisa

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,952
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Althea W
    Newest Member
    Althea W
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Celiac-safe home for summer rental in Washington DC

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      It's nice to see celiac-safe options out there for guest homes.
    • Scott Adams
      How many grams is there in one slice of wheat bread?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your situation involves interpreting elevated Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgG levels, which can indeed be confusing without clear symptoms or additional diagnostic tools like a biopsy. Here’s a possible approach to help clarify your next steps: Understanding DGP IgG: DGP IgG is a blood test often used to help diagnose celiac disease, particularly in individuals with IgA deficiency. However, since you’ve confirmed you don’t have IgA deficiency, the focus should shift to other celiac-specific tests, such as tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) and endomysial antibodies (EMA-IgA), which are more specific for celiac disease. Elevated DGP IgG alone is not diagnostic of celiac disease but may indicate gluten-related immune activity. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): You’re correct that NCGS does not typically show abnormalities in blood tests like celiac disease does. NCGS is diagnosed based on symptoms (e.g., bloating, fatigue, brain fog) that improve on a gluten-free diet, after celiac disease and wheat allergy have been ruled out. Since you don’t currently have symptoms, NCGS seems less likely in your case. Possible Next Steps: Monitor Symptoms: If you remain asymptomatic, it’s reasonable to continue eating gluten and retest after some time. This is because celiac disease can develop or become symptomatic later, and ongoing gluten consumption is necessary for accurate testing. Repeat Testing: Consider repeating the tTG-IgA test, as it is the most sensitive and specific for celiac disease. If this is also elevated, it strengthens the case for further investigation. Genetic Testing: If available, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 genetic testing can help rule out celiac disease if negative, as nearly all celiac patients carry one or both of these genes. However, a positive result doesn’t confirm celiac disease, as these genes are common in the general population. Dietary Trial: If testing remains inconclusive and you develop symptoms, a supervised gluten-free diet trial might provide clarity. However, this should only be done after thorough testing, as going gluten-free prematurely can interfere with accurate diagnosis. Biopsy Limitation: Since a biopsy is not available in your town, you’ll need to rely on blood tests and clinical judgment. If your tests remain inconclusive but you develop symptoms, you may need to travel to a facility that can perform a biopsy for definitive diagnosis. In summary, if I were in your position, I would continue consuming gluten, monitor for symptoms, and retest with more specific celiac markers (tTG-IgA and EMA-IgA) in a few months. If symptoms develop or tests remain ambiguous, consulting a gastroenterologist for further guidance would be advisable. Always work with a healthcare provider to interpret results and tailor next steps to your specific situation.
    • trents
      What should I do with these test results?

      By trents · Posted

      The fact is, we know very little about the mechanism of NCGS at this point. We know much more about celiac disease. Some experts believe that NCGS can transition into celiac disease. And I do not agree with what you read about NCGS not producing any elevated antibody tests. IMO, and I have no scientific data to support this, it's just a hunch base on reading many, many forum contributor test result reports, elevated igg antibodies may signal a transition from NCGS to celiac disease.  But there are other things besides gluten that can cause elevated dgp igg and ttg igg antibody levels. So, yes. I would continue to monitor the situation if I were you and get regular testing. Not necessarily every 6 months but yearly anyway if you can. In the meantime, if you know gluten causes you unwellness, continue to avoid it.
    • Scott Adams
      Anyone else with very high HDL?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Statins are a widely prescribed class of medications used to lower cholesterol levels and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and strokes. Extensive scientific research, including large-scale randomized controlled trials, has demonstrated their efficacy and safety for most individuals. Statins work by inhibiting an enzyme involved in cholesterol production in the liver, thereby reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, often referred to as "bad" cholesterol. Importantly, statins do not "remove all fats" from the body, as suggested in your post. They specifically target cholesterol synthesis and do not deplete essential fats, such as those required for brain function, hormone production, or nutrient absorption. The body still maintains its necessary fat reserves, including healthy fats, which are critical for physiological processes. Regarding the claim that statins cause internal bleeding by making blood vessels permeable, this is not supported by scientific evidence. Statins are not known to increase the risk of internal bleeding. However, like all medications, they can have side effects, such as muscle pain or, in rare cases, liver enzyme abnormalities. The benefits of statins in reducing cardiovascular risk generally outweigh the risks for most patients, particularly those with a history of heart disease or high cholesterol. The suggestion to use odorless garlic, magnesium, vitamin K, and calcium for heart health may have some merit, as these supplements can support cardiovascular function in certain contexts. For example, magnesium is involved in muscle and nerve function, while vitamin K plays a role in blood clotting and bone health. However, these should not replace evidence-based treatments like statins when prescribed by a healthcare provider. Always consult a medical professional before making changes to medication or starting new supplements, as individual health needs vary.
    • trents
      Colonoscopy with large area of inflammation

      By trents · Posted

      Just judging from the reports we get from forum members sharing their endoscopy results, very common. But we also get a lot of reports of inflammation in those areas coupled with a negative biopsy for celiac. But I wonder if in a lot of those latter cases we are seeing NCGS or a transition from NCGS to celiac. I have no scientific data to support that. It's just a hunch.
×
×
  • Create New...