Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Diet Soda, No Aspartame


MyMississippi

Recommended Posts

Skylark Collaborator

A statement like this really should be backed up with links.

I would suggest folks that are concerned do a search with the words 'splenda and adverse reactions' A lot will come up and then people can decide whether they want to use this.

I get so frustrated when I look for info on Splenda. The peer-reviewed research that says it's safe is mostly funded by the manufacturer. The journal articles very clearly state the source of funding, as is required. There are a few other safety studies out there, with only one rat study that managed to find anything. With rather high doses, they got effects on liver enzymes and changes in gut microflora. To even approach the low dose, you'd need to have to be eating and drinking Splenda-sweetened drinks and baked goods at every meal, every day, for weeks on end. Also, studies on rats do not always translate very well to humans. This study is certainly not representative of a human drinking a can or two of soda.

Open Original Shared Link

To my amusement, a hired panel published an article shooting this particular study down. Notice the scientists are listed as "independent consultants", meaning that they were probably paid by the Splenda manufacturer.

Open Original Shared Link

If I just go to Google all I can find is people repeating all the various fear campaigns that the sugar lobby started. Their fear campaign about the chlorine atoms on Splenda was a brilliant ploy and has been repeated all over the Internet, scaring people into buying sugar again for years now.

The latest rumor is "the manufacturer has confirmed Splenda causes seizures and migraines" but again I suspect the sugar lobby at work. There is nothing on the FDA site about analysis of their passive surveillance, which has to be made public by law if it has been done. There are certainly some stories out there of people who can't tolerate Splenda, but there are a stories about just about anything we eat or drink because of individual sensitivities.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lily127 Rookie

There is a brand called 'Waist Watchers' that uses Splenda. The Black Cherry is ok but tastes VERY sweet (they might haver root beer too, not sure). In a way it kind of works for me because rather than chugging down 2 glasses of it (or 3) I can just pour half a glass and sip on it to get that sweet taste I'm craving because a little of this stuff goes a long way...

I also drink regular Coke and Water. I used to drink Seltzer but man the gas... whooopa!!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,135
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PePaw
    Newest Member
    PePaw
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
    • Skg414228
      Correct. I’m doing both in the same go though. Thanks for clarifying before I confused someone. I’m doing a colonoscopy for something else and then they added the endoscopy after the test. 
    • trents
      It is a biopsy but it's not a colonoscopy, it's an endoscopy.
    • Skg414228
      Well I’m going on the gluten farewell tour so they are about to find out lol. I keep saying biopsy but yeah it’s a scope and stuff. I’m a dummy but luckily my doctor is not. 
    • trents
      The biopsy for celiac disease is done of the small bowel lining and in conjunction with an "upper GI" scoping called an endoscopy. A colonoscopy scopes the lower end of the intestines and can't reach up high enough to get to the small bowel. The endoscopy goes through the mouth, through the stomach and into the duodenum, which is at the upper end of the intestinal track. So, while they are scoping the duodenum, they take biopsies of the mucosal lining of that area to send off for microscopic analysis by a lab. If the damage to the mucosa is substantial, the doc doing the scoping can often see it during the scoping.
×
×
  • Create New...