Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Going Gluten Free Before Biopsy


Farmer Brown's Cow

Recommended Posts

Farmer Brown's Cow Newbie

Hi,

I'm new to the forum.

I've been in college for two years now. The first semester went off well. The 2nd was wrecked with stomach pain. The 3rd was horrible with beginning joint pain. This latest one had been a nightmare.

Like most people, the doctor didn't have an answer. It was a pure coincidence (my friend was being tested for Celiac--negative) that I even thought of Celiac. I've always had intermittent stomach issues. I thought it was stress. Too much food. Not enough.

I did a week off gluten--felt marginally better, went to the nurses and bam! Positive test results.

I had to wait until I got home to go to a GI. He recommended to got with a biopsy. The next available one is not until the August 1st.

I've been eating gluten ever since. I've felt so much better off gluten/dairy.

I was wondering if I could go off gluten for a month and a half then go back on two weeks before. I have felt horrible test past few weeks and would like to get back on track with my life.

What do you think? Any advice?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Aleshia Contributor
Hi,

I'm new to the forum.

I've been in college for two years now. The first semester went off well. The 2nd was wrecked with stomach pain. The 3rd was horrible with beginning joint pain. This latest one had been a nightmare.

Like most people, the doctor didn't have an answer. It was a pure coincidence (my friend was being tested for Celiac--negative) that I even thought of Celiac. I've always had intermittent stomach issues. I thought it was stress. Too much food. Not enough.

I did a week off gluten--felt marginally better, went to the nurses and bam! Positive test results.

I had to wait until I got home to go to a GI. He recommended to got with a biopsy. The next available one is not until the August 1st.

I've been eating gluten ever since. I've felt so much better off gluten/dairy.

I was wondering if I could go off gluten for a month and a half then go back on two weeks before. I have felt horrible test past few weeks and would like to get back on track with my life.

What do you think? Any advice?

I went off gluten for about a month and 1/2 and my GI told me that I would only need to be back on gluten for 5 -7 days for the biopsy. also my pediatrician just told me that the GI's at childrens hospital told them that a month off of gluten wouldn't affect a blood test... I disagree with that so will have the kids on gluten for about 3 days before hand just to be sure. but if you feel better off gluten it would be good to stay off of it as much as possible! just had my endoscopy done about 5 days ago and am expecting results back after the weekend. GI told me that he saw possible signs of celiac but said that could just be because he was looking for it so he wants to wait till the biopsy is back to say for sure.

Tim-n-VA Contributor

This is one of a group of related questions that come up a lot where the answer depends on how important a definitive medical diasnosis is to you. Some people have family issues where a self diagnosis isn't sufficient.

IF you need that definitive biopsy-based diagnois, you are much better off staying on gluten until August because different people heal quicker, etc. and you can't predict the impact of one month off and one month on. Any attempt to go back on gluten later for a second test will be even worse. Gluten reactions tend to get worse when you've been off gluten.

The two sides are that some people are okay with knowing they feel better without gluten and don't need the definitive diagnosis. Others want to know the definite diagnosis for family members who think its "all in your head". The other main reason for needing the definite diagnosis is that Celiac overlaps other diseases in symptoms and some can even cause false lab results. Since a disease involving a major body system (immune in this case) makes it more likely that you'll have other diseases in that system (thyroid, diabetes, etc.) there is at least some medical benefit to knowing exactly what is causing that reaction to gluten.

aikiducky Apprentice

I'd also vote for staying on gluten until the biopsy. You have a chance now to get a definitive diagnosis, don't risk it. You might end up with a borderline result which will either lead to a lot of discussion or to continued testing. I'd stay on gluten until the biopsy, then go gluten free immediately afterwards since you already know you feel better when you do.

Pauliina

hez Enthusiast

I think this is one of those times where you really need to know your own psyche. If long term, you know that you would only follow the diet if you had a formal dx, I would eat the gluten. If you have the psyche that does not need a firm dx go off. It really is a matter of personal choice. I was off the gluten for only two weeks before the biopsy. However, my damage is so severe I could have been off gluten for months and the results would have been the same. I know me, I need a firm dx. Otherwise, I would always question the results which would open the potential for me to be reckless with my diet.

I think you will find this forum a great resource! Welcome to the board!

Hez

tarnalberry Community Regular

Ask yourself why you need more than a positive blood test. Ask your doctor to. (The biopsy is going out of favor as "the gold standard" and more and more doctors are making final diagnoses on blood test panels alone.) Ask yourself if YOU need the biopsy over what you know to be true from experience. And if you do need it - and that's a perfectly fair answer - STAY ON GLUTEN. You don't know how fast your body is going to heal or be damaged by gluten, particularly considering the onset of your symptoms around a year ago. Staying off for almost three months, and then being back on for only a few weeks I would bet gives you pretty decent odds for a false negative. Why go through with a test if you're setting yourself up for inconclusive results?

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
I went off gluten for about a month and 1/2 and my GI told me that I would only need to be back on gluten for 5 -7 days for the biopsy. also my pediatrician just told me that the GI's at childrens hospital told them that a month off of gluten wouldn't affect a blood test... I disagree with that so will have the kids on gluten for about 3 days before hand just to be sure. but if you feel better off gluten it would be good to stay off of it as much as possible! just had my endoscopy done about 5 days ago and am expecting results back after the weekend. GI told me that he saw possible signs of celiac but said that could just be because he was looking for it so he wants to wait till the biopsy is back to say for sure.

Aleshia, I really believe that your GI and the GI's at Children's Hospital are wrong wrong WRONG.

It takes WAY more than 5-7 days to destroy the villi enough to get a positive biopsy. Most of the studies I have seen quoted on this board call for a minimum of 4 slices of bread for a minimum of 2 months, and even then, there is a possibility of having a negative result, as villi damage is often patchy and invisible to the naked eye after YEARS of gluten ingestion.

If your bloodwork was positive and your dietary response was positive, and if there's nothing else the doctor needs to look for (say, Barrett's Esophagus, which is a precancerous condition sometimes seen in untreated GERD), then an endoscopy simply pads the GI's bank account. You already have your answer, don't you?

There is no reason to do an invasive test if the answer is already known. And "First, do no harm," is supposed to be first on the doctor's priority list.

Obviously, gluten is doing you AND your child quite a bit of harm.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



grommet Newbie

It is crap that we have to eat what is making us ill to get a gold standard diagnosis, but you are setting yourself up for an inconclusive result if you go gluten-free now.

Make the best of the time you have left to eat what you want when you want. KFC, Pizzas etc, cos you'll never have 'em again.

I had been gluten-free for 2 years (not knowing anything about coeliac) and then tried for a diagnosis. I ate loads for 7 weeks and it was a negative biopsy. So no diagnosis. Are you prepared for that? If so then you have to do what you think is best.

For those who haven't seen it already - this is useful re clinical guidelines etc:

Open Original Shared Link

Farmer Brown's Cow Newbie

Thanks for the overwhelming support. I think I will stay on gluten. Since I come from an immigrant parents, it's much easier to explain a disease, than an intolerance.

Thanks everyone.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,821
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Maclissa
    Newest Member
    Maclissa
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • ABP2025
      Got it. Thanks Scott. I'll set up an appointment with a GI after the holidays and get all the celiac disease screening done. Thanks to this amazing forum and to all who have answered my question, I now know what my next steps are.
    • ABP2025
      Aah it sucks that there's no definitive way to confirm NCGS or celiac. I've found a GI clinic that is covered by my insurance and I'll contact them after the holidays to setup an appointment. I hope to get some sort of clarity with further tests. 
    • ABP2025
      Thanks @knitty kitty. I didn't know about thiamine deficiency before you had mentioned it. I'm doing more research into what it is and how I can test for that deficiency. Is Vitamin B1 test the best way to find it? I saw that there is another test: Erythrocyte transketolase activity coefficient (ETKAC) assay to test for thiamine deficiency but I'm not sure how that test is done. Is that something I can take on my own or do I need GI referral. If it does turn out that I'm thiamine deficient, does that confirm that I have celiac disease or could it just mean that I have not been consuming Vitamin B1 rich food and once I address that with a supplement or food, I would no longer be thiamine deficient? Also full disclosure, I'm a vegetarian and only last year I found out that my Vitamin D level was very low. It was 3.7 ng/ml and the ideal range is >29.9 ng/ml. After a year of taking multivitamin supplement, my Vitamin D level has gone up to 27 ng/ml. Though it's better than 3.7 ng/ml, it's still below the range. I'm not sure for how long my Vitamin D level was around 3.7 ng/ml before 2023 as I didn't have my Vitamin D test taken prior to that. My doctor also wanted to check my Vitamin B12 level as I might not be getting enough of it from vegetarian sources. When I took that test last year, Vitamin B12 was 247 pg/ml and ideal range is 200-1100 pg/ml. So it's still within the range though it's on the lower end of the ideal range. I also have recently started taking vitamin b-complex tablets daily. I've never checked other Vitamin B levels including Vitamin B1. Do you know if such a very low level of Vitamin D and moderately lower level of Vitamin B12 would cause celiac disease or may contribute to some of the symptoms I've been experiencing? Regarding the DNA test to test celiac genes, are you referring to HLA DQ2 and HLA DQ8 tests? As soon as I got the result where my IgG was above range, I had ordered the "HLA Typing for Celiac Disease" test in Quest Diagnostics which measures HLA DQ2 and HLA DQ8. The test is 2 weeks from now and I'll post my results here once I receive them.  
    • Russ H
      Small amounts of gliadin are detectable in some samples of human breast milk but these are at too low a level to cause symptoms. No gliadin has been detected in the beef of grain-fed cattle.   https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5622696/
    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @Kiwifruit, I agree further testing is needed.  Disaccharidase deficiency is a symptom of Celiac disease.   On your test results, this line  "IgA: 0.9 g/l (norm 0.8 - 4.0)" is referring to Total IgA and it's very low.  People with low or deficient Total IgA should also have DGP IgG test done.  Low Total IgA means you are making low levels of tTg  IgA as well, leading to false negatives or "weak positives".  Maybe a DNA test for known Celiac genes.   Anemia, diabetes, and thiamine deficiency can cause test results like these.  Get checked for B12 deficiency anemia and have your iron (ferritin) checked.  Vitamin D deficiency is common, too.   Might be time to find a gastrointestinal doctor who is more familiar with diagnosing Celiac Disease.   Best wishes on your journey!  Please keep us posted on your progress.  
×
×
  • Create New...