Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diabetes And Celiac


dollamasgetceliac?

Recommended Posts

dollamasgetceliac? Explorer

This is a continuation from the thread on the prediagnosis board ":o do I have diabetes?"

continue discussion here


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



dollamasgetceliac? Explorer

We left off @...

No, that's not right. There's no reason to theorize some new human protein for gliadin to mimic. We produce endorphin upon exertion. The body could monitor endorphin levels to find out if insulin is needed to shut down muscle consumption. The body sees a flood of blood gliadin, mistakes it for endorphin, as a sign of muscle consumption, and responds with a flood of insulin.

We already know celiac bodies mistake gliadin for endorphin, and that the body produces endorphin after a certain level of exertion. The remaining information is technical, and unimportant to the hypothesis. How does the body normally delay the insulin effect long enough to allow a fight-or-flight response?

..

dollamasgetceliac? Explorer
.........and here's evidence:

Open Original Shared Link

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Using a specific antiserum, beta-endorphin was quantitated in 8 human pancreas obtained at autopsy by radioimmunoassay and localized by immunocytochemistry. .........Pancreatic beta-endorphin concentration in two premature infants were within the range found in adults. In one diabetic pancreas, there was no measurable beta- endorphin. Specific beta-endorphin immunofluorescence is localized within the pancreatic islets. This finding suggests that beta-endorphin may participate in intraislet regulation of pancreatic hormone secretion.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

I believe that type 2 diabetes, at least in some patients, is a broken fight-or-flight response. The pancreas mistakes gliadin for stress-encited endorphin.

..

I had Elevated Pancreas numbers at one point, The Drs. thought it was Pancreatitis due to a water pill ( Hydrochlorothizide) It is a side effect . Pancertitis is very PAINFUL The thing is that I stopped the med and the Enzymes dropped.

So the Drs. said you never had it , my blood must have gotten mixed up with someone else. Now I wonder does the pancreas get higher Enzymes ( Amalyse and the other one) if you have Celiac?Or Diabetes? This is getting way ahead of me. All I know that Pacertitis was diagnosed and then they said it was gone. And I hope to God I never ever get it again.

Any way if someone would like to post a continuation to this thread I would be most greatfull.

I have now a blood Monitor thanks for helping me out with this.

And I guess I have to get a book to count my Carbs. Or maybe I can use my wait watchers monitor?Hmmm

ShayFL Enthusiast

I have had a monitor for 12 years. I get a new one every year. I am not diabetic. But both my Grammy's were. I keep close tabs on it.

Keep in mind that the meters are not 100% accurate. They can be off by as much as 10 % - 20% either way. They are just used as a guideline. So dont panic if you get a 140 reading. You might not be "damaging" your organs. It could really only be 126. When this happens to me, I just restest in an hour to make sure it has gone down to "normal". And it always does. I dont get those high readings very often. And my fasting is always around 80 with labwork. and my HbA1c is 5.2. So I am good.

I just had a complete diabetes panel. It tested blood and urine. Tested like 15 different things. Very informative.

psawyer Proficient

A number of years ago, the Canadian Diabetes Association stopped using the term "normal" to refer to blood sugar levels, and began using "optimal." This was in recognition of the fact that even in people without diabetes, significant fluctuations in blood glucose levels happen. It was learned that it was common for people without diabetes to have "abnormal" sugar levels from time to time.

It takes time for the body to respond and secrete insulin. This causes temporary spikes in the instantaneous readings, without causing long-term harm. The HbA1c reading is an average over three months, and is a much better indicator of glucose levels.

And, as Shay said, meters are not infallible either. They deteriorate over time, and the sample can be distorted by the presence of something on the skin at the point where the sample is taken.

Shay, if your HbA1c is 5.2, you have absolutely nothing to worry about with respect to blood glucose levels. In my dreams I hope to get below 7. I have been insulin dependent for more than 22 years.

ShayFL Enthusiast

That is interesting Pete. And makes sense that there would not be a standard "normal" reading. I dont actively "worry" about my blood sugar. But I do keep tabs on it. I get regular blood work annually. And with he meter, I only spot check. And this might sound funny, but if I feel tired during the day and want to take a nap, I sometimes check it. If it is on the higher side, I take a walk instead and this refreshes me. If it is lower, I will nap which refreshes me. Maybe that is all in my head, but it seems to work for me. :)

dollamasgetceliac? Explorer

Keep in mind that the meters are not 100% accurate. They can be off by as much as 10 % - 20% either way. They are just used as a guideline. So dont panic if you get a 140 reading. You might not be "damaging" your organs. It could really only be 126. When this happens to me, I just restest in an hour to make sure it has gone down to "normal". And it always does. I dont get those high readings very often. And my fasting is always around 80 with labwork. and my HbA1c is 5.2. So I am good.

I just had a complete diabetes panel. It tested blood and urine. Tested like 15 different things. Very informative.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

HbA1c is glycosylated hemoglobin. Open Original Shared Link

Since the red cells in the blood are constantly being replaced by new ones, it gives a good indication of your average blood glucose over the past three months (the lifespan of a red cell is three months). It is not affected by the timing of samples, as a meter is. The nature of the A1C is that the sampling is, in effect, continuous.

There is not universal agreement on what a normal level should be, but anything above 7 would be diagnostic of diabetes. In Canada, two fasting sugar levels on different occasions above 7.0 mmol/L is considered diagnostic of diabetes (in the US this would be 126 mg/dL, if I recall correctly).

I hope that helps.

ShayFL Enthusiast

This is what I had done:

Open Original Shared Link

Plus antibodies to insulin and my pancreas.

It explains what the HbA1c is.

Fasting glucose will not give you the complete picture. Since celiac is connected to "Type 1 Diabetes" (in children AND adults), you may wish to have your doctor check your antibodies to your pancreas as well.

Do not dispair. You can alter your diet and it will help a lot. Keeping your body as alkaline as possible is a great help at staving it off. Eat fresh fruits and LOTS of veggies and buy some alkaline drops for your water. Not too much meat. Minimize sugar. And make sure your carbs have fiber (or add some). I like Chia seeds (fiber plus Omega 3's).

Daily exercise is a MUST and I credit it to my not having diabetes. I started a regular routine in my early 20's. Most dont start till their 40's when forced to. At least 30 minutes a day is good, but 45 is better if you can. You can split it up. Taking a walk shortly after a meal will help keep it from going too high.

ShayFL Enthusiast

And make sure you are addressing any deficiencies you have. Many nutrients affect blood sugar:

VITAMIN D AND DIABETES

Gabe Mirkin, M.D.

A study from Bulgaria shows that giving vitamin D supplements to diabetics during the winter markedly improved control of their blood sugar levels.

The majority of North Americans require sunlight to meet their needs for vitamin D because they do not meet their needs from the foods that they eat. Many people in temperate climates therefore are deficient in vitamin D by the end of winter. Lack of vitamin D impairs a person's immunity and ability to produce insulin and respond to insulin. This study shows that giving vitamin D pills to Type 2 diabetics during the winter improved control of blood sugar levels by increasing the first response of insulin from the pancreas to a rise in blood sugar, and by improving cell response to insulin. If this study can be confirmed, all diabetics should take vitamin D-rich foods or pills whenever they cannot get adequate exposure to sunshine. See report #D222.

The effect of vitamin D-3 on insulin secretion and peripheral insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic patients. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2003, Vol 57, Iss 4, pp 258-261. AM Borissova, T Tankova, G Kirilov, L Dakovska, R Kovacheva. Borissova AM, Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, 6 Damjan Gruev Str, Sofia 1303, BULGARIA

++++++

Open Original Shared Link

veggienft Rookie

Just because some people who end up with type 2 diabetes pass through a "hypoglycemic" stage doesn't mean everyone with hypoglycemia is going to get type 2. There are probably just as many hypoglycemics who don't get type 2.

Hypoglycemia would mean low blood sugar. But that's not the diagnostic criteria. Anybody who's blood sugar fluctuates is "hypoglycemic". Hypoglycemia is a scatter shot, and is not a reliable means of identifying future diabetics.

What is? I don't think there is a reliable means of identifying future diabetics. I don't blame you for asking, but sometimes life's a gamble.

The operable question for hypoglycemics lies in outlook. Either you're gonna stay hypoglycemic, or you're gonna become type 2 diabetic .......unless you come up with a diet which ends both possibilities.

I think chronic hypoglycemia is caused by candida overgrowth. Many people's immune systems respond to Candida as they respond to wheat gluten. They empty the stomach contents into the bloodstream. If the stomach has lots of sugar in it, then the blood gets an instant flood of sugar.

Candida thrives on stomach sugar. As a result, controlling hypoglycemia would have little to do with controlling total carbohydrate intake and everything to do with eliminating sugar intake.

Type 1 diabetes is gliadin plugging into the nerve pain receptors in the pancreas in place of endorphin. The immune receptors recognize the gliadin as an invader, and attack the nerve pain receptors. It makes the pancreas shut down and stop producing insulin. After some time it kills the pancreatic islet cells.

Type 2 diabetes is pancreatic sensory nerves mistaking blood gliadin for endorphin, as it looks for signs that muscles are consuming themselves in a fight-or-flight response. The nerve cells continuously release insulin to stop the conversion of fat into sugar, in a futile attempt to stop muscle activity.

Combining the actions of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, one must come to the unmistakable conclusion that the pancreas works off pain. To the pancreas, pain means the blood has the proper adrenalin/insulin balance, and the pancreas is operating properly. Such a deviation from normal nervous system operation would not be possible in the body's major nervous system. But pancreas nerves are part of the enteric nervous system, a semi-autonomous nervous system.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,455
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Zpayt
    Newest Member
    Zpayt
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @jimmydee! Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder, meaning the consumption of gluten triggers a response by the immune system that causes the body to attack it's own tissue. Celiac disease has a genetic base that requires some kind of trigger for the genes to be turned on. We know that there are two primary genes responsible for providing the potential to develop celiac disease and we know that about 40% of the population carries one or both of these genes. However, only about 1% of the population actually develops celiac disease. So, that tells us that something more than just having the genes is necessary in order to develop celiac disease. Something must trigger those genes to wake up and produce the active disease. It's that "something" that we are struggling to understand and that is somewhat of a mystery. But there is a growing body of evidence pointing to the culprit being a disruption of the proper balance of microorganisms in the gut. Apparently, the microorganisms that live in our intestines produce chemicals that regulate the size of the openings in the mucous lining of our small bowel. A disruption in the healthy balance of this microorganic community causes an increase in the size of the openings in the mucous lining. This in turn allows protein fragments from the food we eat that are larger than normal to invade the mucous lining where they are detected as threats by the immune system. This is what is happening with gluten for those with celiac disease. The attack in the mucous lining of the small bowel by the immune system on these incompletely broken down gluten components causes inflammation and, over time, as we continue to consume gluten, it damages the mucosal lining of the small bowel which results in the loss of efficiency of nutrient absorption. This mucosal lining is made up of millions of tiny finger like projections that create an enormous surface area for the absorption of nutrients when healthy. The "wearing down" of these millions of finger-like projections due to celiac inflammation greatly reduces the surface area and thus the ability to absorb nutrients. This in turn typically results in numerous health issues that have a nutrient deficiency base. But the answer to the question of why there seems to be an epidemic of celiac disease in recent years may not be simple. It may have many facets. First, we don't know how much of this epidemic is real and how much is apparent. That is, how much of what we perceive of as a dramatic increase in the incidence of celiac disease is simply due to greater awareness and better detection methods? Celiac disease is not new. There is evidence from ancient writings that people suffered from it back then but they did not have a name for it. And it wasn't until WW2 that gluten was identified as the cause of celiac disease. Current thinking on what is causing imbalance in gut biology has put forth a number of causes including overuse of antibiotics and pesticides, environmental toxins, fluoridation of drinking water, preoccupation with hygiene and sanitation, and the western diet. https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/theories-on-the-growing-prevalence-of-celiac-disease-and-gluten-sensitivity-over-the-last-half-century-video-r6716/?tab=comments#comment-25345 All this to say that I doubt your UTI or the low dose aspirin had anything to do with the onset of your celiac disease. It was probably just coincidence unless the UTI was the stress trigger that activated the celiac potential genes. But what is interesting about your low dose aspirin theory is that aspirin is in a class of medications known as NSAIDs (Non Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drugs). Scientific studies have shown that long term use of NSAIDs can damage the villous lining of the small bowel in the same way as celiac disease.  The other thing I wish to point out is that unless you have actual testing done for celiac disease, you can't be sure if you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They share many of the same symptoms, the difference being that NCGS doesn't damage the lining of the small bowel. There is no test for NCGS, celiac disease must first be ruled out. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease. The antidote for both is a gluten free diet.
    • julie falco
      BRAND NAME: NOT BURGER PLANT-BASED PATTIES  A product I came across labeled gluten-free bought it when I got home I read the back ingredients further to notice that it says gluten with a line going through it u will see in the attached pics.     The label says down below that it is processed in a facility that also processes "WHEAT".  I tried to put this on the Gov. website as false advertisement but couldn't do it.  Maybe on here at least the word can get out to others not to purchase anything gluten-free without throughly reading the whole label....It won't let me upload 2 pics.  says to contact manager.   The products name is Not Burger    INGREDIENTS: Water, Pea Protein, Coconut Oil, Sunflower Oil, Natural Flavors, Bamboo Fiber, Less than 2% of: Methylcellulose, Dried Yeast, Rice Protein, Salt, Cocoa Powder Processed with Alkali, Psyllium Husk, Potato Fiber, Red Beet Juice Powder (color), Chia Protein Concentrate, Spinach Powder.   Manufactured in a facility that also processes wheat and soy.          MANUFACTURED FOR: The NotCompany, Inc, 438    Treat Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110.
    • jimmydee
      Let me start by saying that I am self- diagnosed Celiac. I didn't want to pay for tests, because I don't have health insurance and the doctor said I would HAVE to eat gluten for the tests and I am afraid it will kill me. I diagnosed myself by quitting dairy, sugar and gluten for a couple weeks and figured out the problem by process of elimination.  ANYWAYS.......here's why I blame "Aspirin low dose safety coated" for my Celiac Disease.  I started taking regular Aspirin for a couple weeks for back pain and decided to switch to low dose safety coated Aspirin because I thought a smaller dose was safer for regular use. Well about 3 days after starting low dose safety coated aspirin, I got a terrible UTI. I didn't know what to do (should have gone to doctor) I started taking cranberry pills and read Aspirin can cause UTIs, so stopped taking that. A week later, the UTI was getting worse but then my Dad gave me some probiotic pills and the next day I felt better, so I took those for a week and the UTI was gone. About a week later, I bought my family cake and pizza for a birthday party. I ate a whole bunch and there was some leftover the next day, so I ate a bunch again. Welp, that was my first Gluten attack. I was home alone and almost called an ambulance, my stomach was so full of gas I couldn't breathe, I was covered in sweat and thought I was having a heart attack.  Since quitting Gluten I haven't had the "gas attacks" or had the awful constipation that lasts 3 days. So I'm certain I'm Celiac and I absolutely blame low dose safety coated Aspirin, I think it's the time release binder that is the problem, because I was fine with regular aspirin, I was just breaking those into halves or quarters. Actually now that I think about it I may have even used the regular aspirin at other times in my life before that, just not the little low dose safety coated Aspirin, that's what I think caused it. What's weird is my Dad took the low dose safety coated Aspirin for years and years, for it's reported heart benefits, and he never got Celiac.  Anyways, I felt this was important to share, so they can find the cause of this disease, which seems to be affecting more people than ever before. At least Gluten Free Pizza exists, that's been my new staple food in my diet.         
    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @Karen Chakerian, We need more information, please.   What homeopathic remedies or medications are you taking now?  Do you still have the blood pressure and other symptoms?  What is included in your diet currently?  Dairy? Oats?  Processed gluten free foods?  Vegetarian?  Other food allergies?  Do you take vitamins?  When gluten is removed from the diet, the body stops making the anti-gluten antibodies that are usually measured in blood tests used to diagnose Celiac disease.  To measure the anti-gluten antibodies, you would have to consume 10 grams of gluten (4-6 slices of bread or equivalent) per day for a minimum of 2 weeks or longer.   A DNA test which looks for the most common genes for Celiac Disease may be a less invasive avenue to pursue.  Has your doctor checked you for nutritional deficiencies? Glad you're here!
    • knitty kitty
      @SaiP, Insomnia is listed as one of the side effects of Loratadine.   Niacin B3 in the form Tryptophan, Pyridoxine B 6, Folate B 9, Cobalamine B12, Magnesium, and Thiamine B 1 are needed to produce the sleep hormone melatonin.  Insomnia can also be caused by low Vitamin D and low Vitamin A.   A strict gluten free diet can be low in essential  vitamins.   Gluten containing products are required to replace vitamins lost in processing and milling.  Gluten free processed foods are not required to have vitamins added.  White rice is not a good source of B vitamins.  Brown rice is little better.  Exposure to light (even grocery store lights) and heat (during transportation) can destroy B vitamins.   B vitamins are easily lost in urine and diarrhea because they are water soluble.  If you have had diarrhea longer than two weeks, you are probably low in B vitamins.  Fat based vitamins, like Vitamins D and A, can be low due to fat malabsorption in Celiac disease, too.   Damaged villa in Celiac Disease do not absorb B vitamins and fat based vitamins and minerals well.  Supplementing with essential nutrients while villi heal boosts the ability to absorb essential vitamins and minerals.  Vitamins are stored and utilized inside cells.  Blood levels are not accurate measurements of vitamin deficiencies.  You can have normal blood levels while having deficiencies inside cells.  The brain orders cells to release their stores so the brain and heart can keep functioning.  This results in normal blood levels, but vitamin deficits inside cells.   Your indulgence in a little bit of bread is providing some, but insufficient amounts, of vitamins needed to make sleep hormone melatonin while keeping your inflammation and histamine production high.   In addition to a B Complex, I took 1000 mg of tryptophan before bed to correct my insomnia caused by high histamine levels.  Correcting my Vitamin D level to between 75-100 nmol/ml helped as well.  Also Passion flower extract is helpful in falling asleep quickly.   Please stop eating gluten bread as this will keep your autoimmune response triggering and your antibody levels won't go down and your histamine levels will stay up as well.   Celiac is a marathon, not a sprint.  P.S. I wanted to reiterate that insomnia and weight loss are symptoms of Thiamine deficiency.  Benfotiamine is a form of thiamine that promotes intestinal healing.  Thiamine is water soluble and nontoxic even in high doses.  High doses are needed to correct thiamine deficiency. All mitochondria in cells utilize thiamine.  The World Health Organization says to take 500 - 1000 mg per day of thiamine and look for health improvement.  Diets that are high in carbohydrates like rice and gluten require more thiamine.  For every 1000 calories from carbohydrates, we need 500 mg more thiamine.  Thiamine is found in meat.  Few veggies contain thiamine. Can you rise from a squat without assistance?  This is the field test for thiamine deficiency used by WHO.  If you cannot rise easily from a squat you may be thiamine deficient.
×
×
  • Create New...